Michael Bachner
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY)
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted Name]
|
Professional correspondence meeting scheduling |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed female client/witness
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. [Redacted]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (AUSA)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | N/A | Scheduled call regarding Epstein investigation | Phone Call | View |
| 2019-08-07 | N/A | Scheduled call between Michael Bachner and USANYS | Telephone | View |
| 2019-08-07 | N/A | Scheduled call/meeting between Michael Bachner and SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney. Bachner missed i... | Phone/Office | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed 'Reverse Proffer' meeting | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza (SDNY ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Scheduled 'Reverse Proffer' meeting between Michael Bachner and SDNY prosecutors. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Arraignment of a different Bachner client on state RICO charges (scheduling conflict). | Queens County | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed reverse proffer meeting at 1 St. Andrew's at 6 PM. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Michael Bachner has a 2 o'clock meeting in his office. | 39 Broadway-Suite 1610, New... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 11 AM or 10:30 AM for a reverse proffer. | Michael Bachner's office | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Previous meeting referenced in the July 31 email ('meeting the week before last'). | Unknown | View |
| 2019-07-09 | N/A | Conversation between Michael Bachner and AUSA team | Unknown (likely phone) | View |
| 2019-07-01 | N/A | Reverse Proffer meeting between SDNY/FBI and Michael Bachner regarding his client. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-04-05 | N/A | Attorney Proffer Meeting | Government Offices (Redacted) | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Meeting between Michael Bachner and USANYS (referenced as 'the week before last' relative to July... | Unknown | View |
| -0019-07-15 | N/A | Meeting between Michael Bachner and SDNY Attorneys | Unknown | View |
EFTA00032215.pdf
This document is a series of email chains between attorney Michael Bachner and government prosecutors (including one named Alex) regarding an 'Attorney Proffer' for a client referred to as Ms. [Redacted]. The correspondence, dating from February to June 2020, discusses the logistics of scheduling interviews, which were complicated by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Key details emerging from the proffer discussions include the client admitting to visiting Epstein's New York and Palm Beach properties, as well as staying at Epstein's Paris apartment with her husband on one occasion. No flight logs or aircraft data are contained in this document.
EFTA00030829.pdf
This document is an email chain dated July 9, 2019, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and attorney Michael Bachner. The AUSA is following up on a conversation regarding the Epstein investigation, providing contact information for the prosecution team, and attaching both the previously filed Florida non-prosecution agreement and a blank proffer agreement for Bachner to review with his (redacted) client.
EFTA00030543.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 31 to August 7, 2019, between defense attorney Michael Bachner and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding the Epstein investigation. The USANYS attorneys express urgency, noting they have been 'holding in abeyance a grand jury date' and refuse Bachner's request to delay a discussion until August 14. The parties eventually agree to speak at 2:30 PM on August 7, 2019.
EFTA00021753.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 31 to August 7, 2019, between attorney Michael Bachner and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns scheduling a status call regarding the 'Epstein investigation' following a previous meeting held in mid-July. The final email confirms a brief 10-minute call for August 7, 2019.
EFTA00021750.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 31 to August 7, 2019, between attorney Michael Bachner (Bachner & Associates) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Epstein investigation'. The correspondence involves scheduling a status discussion, referencing a previous meeting held in mid-July. The final email indicates Bachner missed a scheduled call on August 7 because a prior meeting ran late.
EFTA00021434.pdf
This document is a series of emails from July 2019 between defense attorney Michael Bachner and the SDNY/FBI regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence coordinates a 'reverse proffer' meeting where the government intends to persuade Bachner's female client to cooperate to avoid potential arrest. Bachner explicitly notifies the government that his client intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege if called to testify before a Grand Jury.
EFTA00021428.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between defense attorney Michael Bachner and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses scheduling a 'reverse proffer' meeting and addresses a Grand Jury subpoena for Bachner's client, who intends to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege. The prosecution (SDNY) challenges the blanket invocation of the Fifth Amendment and shares the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and a blank proffer agreement with the defense.
EFTA00014598.pdf
This document is an email chain between defense attorney Michael Bachner and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses scheduling a 'reverse proffer' meeting and addresses a Grand Jury subpoena for Bachner's female client. Bachner formally notifies the prosecution that his client intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, while the prosecution pushes back against a 'blanket' invocation. The emails also reference the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) being sent as an attachment.
EFTA00014564.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Michael Bachner, a lawyer, and an Assistant United States Attorney, along with other redacted individuals, concerning the scheduling of meetings and a 'reverse proffer' related to the Epstein investigation between July 11-15, 2019. The emails discuss various proposed meeting times at different locations in New York, including Bachner's office and the US Attorney's office, with some scheduling conflicts arising from a client's arraignment on a RICO charge in Queens County.
Re: [Redacted] Attorney Proffer
Checking in on status of matters.
Re: [Redacted] Attorney Proffer
Discussing postponement of meeting due to COVID-19 ('world has obviously changed').
Re: [Redacted] Attorney Proffer
Confirming March 17 meeting but noting fluid situation due to Coronavirus; mentions client's town in CT has positive case.
Re: [Redacted] Attorney Proffer
Government requests to interview Ms. [Redacted] directly; proffers have not changed their view of her status.
Re: [Redacted] Attorney Proffer
Clarifies that client stayed in Paris apartment with her husband on one occasion; corrects government's note of 'London'.
Re: [Redacted] Attorney Proffer
Government asks specific questions about visits to New Mexico, Little St. James, Great St. James, and Paris.
[Redacted] Attorney Proffer
Confirms statements in upcoming meeting are preliminary and hypothetical; invokes FRE 408 and 410 protections.
RE: Epstein investigation / [Redacted]
Confirming a call at 2:30 PM, noting flexibility for other times.
RE: Epstein investigation
Notifying Bachner they tried his office and asking if they should reschedule.
RE: Epstein investigation / [Redacted]
Rejecting a week-long delay; mentioning they are holding a grand jury date in abeyance.
RE: Epstein investigation / [Redacted]
Noting they tried to call his office and asking to reschedule.
Re: Epstein investigation / [Redacted]
Stating 'I can talk at 230'.
RE: Epstein investigation
Proposing 2:30 for a call today.
RE: Epstein investigation
Accepting the call but noting he only has about 10 minutes.
RE: Epstein investigation [Redacted]
We just tried your office—please let us know if we should reschedule. Thanks.
RE: Epstein investigation / [Redacted]
Apologizing for missing the earlier time, stating the week is a mess, and asking if Aug 14 works.
RE: Epstein investigation
11:30?
RE: Epstein investigation / [Redacted]
Confirming availability between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. the following Wednesday.
RE: Epstein investigation
Confirming Wednesday works, suggesting between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m.
RE: Epstein investigation [Redacted]
Wednesday ?
RE: Epstein investigation
Wednesday ?
RE: Epstein investigation [Redacted]
That would work -- we could do any time between 11 a.m. and 3 p.m. this coming Wednesday. What time should we put in the calendar?
RE: Epstein investigation [Redacted]
11:30?
RE: Epstein investigation / [Redacted]
Suggesting 11:30?
RE: Epstein investigation [Redacted]
We wanted to follow up on our previous discussions and our meeting the week before last. Is there a good time for you early next week to discuss status?
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity