HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018203.jpg

2.39 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
7
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Policy forum summary / rapporteur's report
File Size: 2.39 MB
Summary

This document is a summary of a Policy Forum held at The Washington Institute featuring James F. Jeffrey and Thomas Pickering regarding U.S. policy toward Iran in 2013. It outlines the urgency of the Iranian nuclear issue and describes four potential outcomes: a unilateral halt by Iran, a negotiated settlement, a military strike, or a shift to containment.

Organizations (3)

Timeline (1 events)

Policy Forum at The Washington Institute (February 7, 2013)

Locations (7)

Relationships (2)

to

Key Quotes (2)

"The move to decision on Iran is the most pressing and dangerous issue on the U.S. and international agenda in 2013."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018203.jpg
Quote #1
"Iran will continue to present a long-term challenge to the United States because of clashing ideologies, conflicting foreign policy goals, and Iran's claim to regional hegemony."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018203.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,768 characters)

The Washington Institute
Year of Decision: U.S. Policy toward Iran in
2013
James F. Jeffrey and Thomas Pickering
February 12, 2013 -- On February 7, 2013, James F. Jeffrey and Thomas
Pickering addressed a Policy Forum at The Washington Institute.
Ambassador Jeffrey, a former assistant to the president and deputy
national security advisor, is author of the new Institute study Moving to
Decision: U.S. Policy toward Iran. Ambassador Pickering served in
numerous key posts at home and abroad over a five-decade career,
including undersecretary of state for political affairs. The following is a
rapporteur's summary of their remarks.
JAMES F. JEFFREY
The move to decision on Iran is the most pressing and dangerous issue on
the U.S. and international agenda in 2013. The year ahead will largely
define the longstanding struggle between Washington and Tehran, and the
considerable stakes involved make it absolutely crucial that a swift and
decisive resolution be achieved. Regardless of the outcome of the nuclear
issue, however, Iran will continue to present a long-term challenge to the
United States because of clashing ideologies, conflicting foreign policy
goals, and Iran's claim to regional hegemony.
There are four likely outcomes to the nuclear issue: a unilateral Iranian
decision to halt or dramatically slow its progress toward a nuclear weapon;
a negotiated outcome, whether through the P5+1 (i.e., the five permanent
members of the UN Security Council plus Germany) or bilateral
negotiations; a military strike, as threatened by President Obama and
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu; and an explicit or implicit
shift to containment, indicating that Washington would be prepared to
coexist with a nuclear-armed Iran.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018203

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document