P5+1
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Iran
|
Diplomatic negotiation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Planned meeting between P5+1 and Iran. | Unspecified | View |
| 2025-06-01 | N/A | Iran rejects proposal | Unknown | View |
| 2015-03-01 | N/A | End of diplomatic hiatus regarding P5+1 negotiations | Unknown | View |
| 2013-02-26 | N/A | Scheduled negotiations between Iran and the P5+1. | Kazakhstan | View |
| 2013-02-26 | N/A | Scheduled talks between Iran and P5+1. | Not specified | View |
| 2013-02-25 | N/A | Scheduled meeting between P5+1 and Iran | Kazakhstan | View |
| 2012-07-01 | N/A | Last round of negotiations (seven months prior to Feb 2013). | Moscow | View |
| 2012-06-01 | N/A | Iran rejected a proposal from P5+1 powers. | Unknown | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | First round of Iran-P5+1 talks | Vienna | View |
| 0025-02-01 | N/A | P5+1 Negotiations | Kazakhstan | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026810.jpg
This document is a Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs briefing slide, authored by Francis J. Kelly, analyzing the geopolitical and market implications of the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA). It notes that the deal will proceed despite US Congress opposition, highlights a 'quiet promise' of weapons sales to Saudi Arabia to secure their support, and outlines commercial opportunities for European corporations, specifically noting Iran's desire to build 400 luxury hotels. The document includes economic forecasts for Iran's GDP and export data, sourced from the IIF and IMF, and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027106.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis or article regarding Iran's nuclear program, likely from early 2013. It discusses the political tension within Iran between President Ahmadinejad and advisor Velayati, the impact of sanctions, and potential diplomatic solutions proposed by the Arms Control Association involving the P5+1. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was likely part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027105.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of a news article or geopolitical analysis focusing on the Obama administration's stalling policy regarding Iran's nuclear program. It discusses the P5+1 negotiations, the specific technical demands regarding uranium enrichment at the Fordow facility, and the differing views between US and European leaders (Cameron and Ashton) regarding sanctions relief. While the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027105' suggests this document is part of a congressional investigation (potentially related to materials found in possession of Epstein or his associates), the text itself is strictly a geopolitical briefing without direct mention of Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018203.jpg
This document is a summary of a Policy Forum held at The Washington Institute featuring James F. Jeffrey and Thomas Pickering regarding U.S. policy toward Iran in 2013. It outlines the urgency of the Iranian nuclear issue and describes four potential outcomes: a unilateral halt by Iran, a negotiated settlement, a military strike, or a shift to containment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032166.jpg
This document appears to be a draft of a statement or email written by a former Israeli military commander (likely Ehud Barak, given the context of commanding Netanyahu). The text defends Benjamin Netanyahu against charges of cowardice by citing his past military service, while simultaneously defending President Obama and Secretary Kerry as 'Good Friends' of Israel despite disagreements over Iran and Syria. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025055.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a political analysis or article regarding US-Iran relations during the Obama administration, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025055). The text discusses the stagnation of P5+1 negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program and suggests that a direct bilateral summit between President Obama and the Iranian leadership might be necessary for a breakthrough. It argues that Iran seeks respect, security guarantees, and sanctions relief, while noting there is no evidence Iran has decided to build nuclear weapons.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025051.jpg
A document authored by Patrick Seale dated February 12, 2013, analyzing upcoming nuclear negotiations between the P5+1 and Iran in Kazakhstan. The text discusses the political climate in Washington and Tehran, quotes President Ahmadinejad's conditions for negotiation, and mentions potential IAEA inspections at Parchin. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029817.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical briefing or analysis paper produced for the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029817). It discusses the diplomatic climate regarding Iran's nuclear program around early 2013, referencing President Obama's new security team (Kerry, Hagel, Brennan) and the potential for a 'shop, ship, and shut' deal structure involving the P5+1. The text speculates on the existence of secret back-channel talks similar to those that occurred in Vienna in 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029815.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of an article or report regarding geopolitical tensions and nuclear negotiations between the United States/P5+1 and Iran around early 2013. It details the specific demands regarding uranium enrichment at the Fordo facility and notes that despite President Obama's reelection, the US increased sanctions rather than offering concessions. The page bears a House Oversight Bates stamp but contains no direct text references to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029730.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis or article discussing United States-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations. It outlines the composition of President Obama's second-term national security team (Kerry, Hagel, Brennan) and discusses potential strategies for a preliminary deal involving sanctions relief in exchange for limits on enrichment. The text also references historical back-channel talks in 2009 and speculates on current secret diplomacy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029728.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis or news article discussing US-Iran relations and nuclear negotiations (P5+1) circa early 2013. It details the stalemate in talks, specifically regarding uranium enrichment at Fordo and economic sanctions signed by President Obama. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer stamp, suggesting it was part of a Congressional document production, though the text itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029727.jpg
A printout of an article from 'The Diplomat' authored by Robert Dreyfuss on February 6, 2013. The article discusses the scheduling of diplomatic negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 group in Kazakhstan, following a seven-month hiatus since meetings in Moscow. It frames these upcoming talks as a test for the Obama administration and new Secretary of State John Kerry. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029691.jpg
This document is a page from a geopolitical briefing or intelligence report sent to Jeffrey Epstein in early 2013. It details political developments in Egypt, Iran (nuclear talks and internal conflict), Saudi Arabia (royal appointments), and Yemen (UN visits and protests). The document concludes with a strict legal disclaimer identifying the content as confidential, attorney-client privileged, and the property of Jeffrey Epstein, directing inquiries to the email address jeevacation@gmail.com.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029371.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a larger report or memo (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029371) discussing geopolitical strategy regarding Iran's nuclear program. It analyzes the incentives of the Iranian government, the status of P5+1 negotiations, and suggests that Iran perceives a shift in American goals. The text argues that a bad agreement is worse than no agreement and notes that diplomacy is paused until at least March 2015.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity