DOJ-OGR-00010654.jpg

792 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / expert opinion letter
File Size: 792 KB
Summary

This document is a letter dated June 7, 2022, from legal ethics expert Bruce A. Green to the SDNY prosecutors handling the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Green, retained by Alan Dershowitz, argues that prosecutors may have an ethical obligation to review a sealed deposition given by Virginia Giuffre in a separate civil case before Judge Preska. Dershowitz claims this deposition proves Giuffre lacks credibility regarding the Epstein-Maxwell matter, and Green suggests the prosecutors should verify this before Giuffre provides a victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Bruce A Green Legal Ethics Expert / Author
Retained by Alan Dershowitz to provide legal ethics opinion; former Deputy Chief and Chief Appellate Attorney for the...
Alan Dershowitz Professor / Client
Retained Bruce Green; raising concerns about Virginia Giuffre's credibility based on a sealed deposition.
Virginia Giuffre Victim / Witness
Notified of right to make victim impact statement at Maxwell sentencing; accused by Dershowitz of lacking credibility.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the upcoming sentencing hearing (United States v. Maxwell).
Maurene Comey Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)
Recipient of the letter at SDNY.
Alison Moe Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)
Recipient of the letter at SDNY.
Alex Rossmiller Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)
Recipient of the letter at SDNY.
Judge Preska District Judge
Presiding over the pending civil case between Giuffre and Dershowitz.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York
Recipient of the letter; prosecuting body.
Fordham Law School
Implied by sender's email and CV link.
ABA (American Bar Association)
Green mentions being a member and chair of the ABA Criminal Justice Standards.
Hofstra Law Review
Publisher of Green's article on candor.

Timeline (2 events)

Recent (relative to June 2022)
Civil deposition of Virginia Giuffre
Before District Judge Preska
Upcoming (relative to June 2022)
Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing
SDNY Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Sender's address (Bruce A Green).
Recipient's address (SDNY).

Relationships (3)

Bruce A Green Professional/Retained Alan Dershowitz
I have been retained on behalf of Professor Alan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz Legal Adversaries Virginia Giuffre
civil deposition testimony in their pending case
Bruce A Green Former Employee/Consultant SDNY (Office)
I provided advice to the Office in the 1980s when I served as Deputy Chief and Chief Appellate Attorney

Key Quotes (3)

"I have been retained on behalf of Professor Alan Dershowitz to provide my opinions as a legal ethics expert regarding prosecutors’ candor obligations relating to Virginia Giuffre’s submissions at Ghislaine Maxwell’s upcoming sentencing."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010654.jpg
Quote #1
"Professor Dershowitz has informed the U.S. Attorney’s Office (“Office”) that Ms. Giuffre’s recent civil deposition testimony in their pending case before District Judge Preska establishes Ms. Giuffre’s serious lack of credibility with respect to the Epstein-Maxwell matter"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010654.jpg
Quote #2
"I have been asked whether, under these circumstances, the Office has a professional responsibility to review the transcript and, if it agrees that Ms. Giuffre’s statement lacks credibility, to so advise the Court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010654.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,887 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 672 Filed 06/24/22 Page 63 of 68
Bruce A Green
150 West 62nd Street, room 7-168
New York, NY 10023
Tel: 917-331-5321
Email: bgreen@law.fordham.edu
June 7, 2022
Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrews Plaza
New York, NY 10007
Attn: AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe & Alex Rossmiller
Re: United States v. Maxwell
Dear Counsel:
I have been retained on behalf of Professor Alan Dershowitz to provide my opinions as a legal ethics expert regarding prosecutors’ candor obligations relating to Virginia Giuffre’s submissions at Ghislaine Maxwell’s upcoming sentencing.
The relevant facts, provided for my consideration, are, in brief, as follows. Although Ms. Giuffre was not a witness at Ms. Maxwell’s trial, she has been notified of her right to make a victim’s impact statement in connection with Ms. Maxwell’s sentencing. She may submit a written statement or testify at the hearing. The presentence report may incorporate her submission, the prosecution might refer to it, and even if not, the District Judge might rely on it in imposing sentence. Professor Dershowitz has informed the U.S. Attorney’s Office (“Office”) that Ms. Giuffre’s recent civil deposition testimony in their pending case before District Judge Preska establishes Ms. Giuffre’s serious lack of credibility with respect to the Epstein-Maxwell matter and would cast doubt on the reliability of her submission at the upcoming sentencing. Professor Dershowitz has further advised that although the deposition transcript is sealed, it is available for the Government’s review before the sentencing. I have been asked whether, under these circumstances, the Office has a professional responsibility to review the transcript and, if it agrees that Ms. Giuffre’s statement lacks credibility, to so advise the Court.
My qualifications to render an expert opinion on questions of prosecutorial ethics such as this one are set forth more fully in my curriculum vitae, which is available here: https://www.fordham.edu/download/downloads/id/1503/bruce_green.pdf. I assume my qualifications would not be disputed, given that I provided advice to the Office in the 1980s when I served as Deputy Chief and Chief Appellate Attorney and have done so more recently as a consultant on legal ethics questions. Of particular significance, for the past three decades I have taught a seminar on Ethics in Criminal Advocacy using self-produced course materials that I regularly update; I have written extensively on prosecutors’ ethics, including on questions of prosecutors’ candor to the court (see Bruce A. Green, Candor in Criminal Advocacy, 44 HOFSTRA L. REV. 429 (2016)); and as a member and chair of the ABA Criminal Justice Standards
1
SDNY_GM_02775899
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
DOJ-OGR-00010654

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document