Marie Villafona

Person
Mentions
28
Relationships
8
Events
0
Documents
9
Also known as:
Villafona

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
8 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Unnamed Witness
No relation
10 Very Strong
2
View
person Jeff Sloman
Superior subordinate
7
1
View
person Unnamed Witness
No known relationship
6
2
View
person Burt Ocariz
Professional
5
1
View
person Unnamed Witness
No relationship
5
1
View
person Mr. Leopold
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Unnamed Witness
Does not know
5
1
View
person Burt Ocariz
Friend
5
1
View
No events found for this entity.

001.pdf

This document is a Notice of Removal filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson, seeking to move a civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The defendants argue that the non-diverse defendant, Haley Robson, was fraudulently joined solely to defeat diversity jurisdiction and prevent removal. Attached as Exhibit A is a deposition transcript of Jane Doe (whose name is redacted) taken on February 20, 2008, in a related criminal case, where she is questioned about her age, MySpace profiles, inconsistencies in her statements to police regarding sexual contact with Epstein, and her interactions with various attorneys and law enforcement officials.

Legal filing (notice of removal) and deposition transcript
2025-12-26

DOJ-OGR-00033086.jpg

This document is page 98 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of lawyer Burt Ocariz and his relationship with lead federal prosecutor Marie Villafona. The questioner also asks if the witness was aware of an alleged attempt by Villafona to have Epstein pay Ocariz to represent the witness, all of which the witness denies knowing.

Legal document transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033084.jpg

This document is page 96 of a deposition transcript recorded by Censor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a witness about their knowledge of communications between FBI agents, federal prosecutors (specifically Marie Villafona and Jeff Sloman), and other individuals (Mr. Leopold and Mr. Herman). The questioning specifically probes whether the witness knew if Mr. Herman was allowed to review or discuss a 'draft indictment' with federal prosecutors.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033034.jpg

This is page 46 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Tein and defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness confirms that attorney Jeffrey Herman was the lawyer who first sued Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. The questioning turns to whether Herman advanced the witness's family any money, at which point Mr. Leopold objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033032.jpg

This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The witness denies being told by federal prosecutors about reimbursement or entitlement to money from a Mr. Epstein. However, the witness confirms having met with federal prosecutors, who they believe were from the FBI, at their home around the year 2008.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033142.jpg

This document is a concordance/index page (Page 154) from a transcript produced by Consor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc. It lists keywords alphabetically from 'V' (Vanity) to 'Y' (Yep), along with their page and line numbers in the source text. Key entities listed include 'Villafona', 'Vince', 'WEISS', and the location 'Wellington'. The document bears a footer date of 07/26/17 and is associated with Public Records Request No. 17-295 and DOJ identifier DOJ-OGR-00033142.

Transcript index / concordance
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012435.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-17

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012434.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness denies knowing individuals named Marie Villafona and Jeffrey Sloman but confirms that they know someone named Jeffrey Herman. The questioning also covers a visit by 'two ladies and two guys' to the witness's house and whether any cell phone communication occurred.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-17

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012433.jpg

This document is page 38 of a deposition transcript from 2008, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012433'. An unnamed witness denies the interviewer's suggestion that they discussed being 'entitled to money from Mr. Epstein' with federal prosecutors and also denies knowing Marie Villafona. The witness does confirm that four federal agents, believed to be from the FBI, visited their home once around 2006 or 2007.

Transcript of interview/deposition
2025-11-17
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

Unknown

From: Marie Villafona
To: Mr. Leopold

Question asked if FBI agents told witness these two had spoken. Witness answered 'No'.

Meeting/conversation
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity