| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
No relation |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Sloman
|
Superior subordinate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
No known relationship |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Burt Ocariz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
No relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Leopold
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Does not know |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Burt Ocariz
|
Friend |
5
|
1 |
This document is a Notice of Removal filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson, seeking to move a civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The defendants argue that the non-diverse defendant, Haley Robson, was fraudulently joined solely to defeat diversity jurisdiction and prevent removal. Attached as Exhibit A is a deposition transcript of Jane Doe (whose name is redacted) taken on February 20, 2008, in a related criminal case, where she is questioned about her age, MySpace profiles, inconsistencies in her statements to police regarding sexual contact with Epstein, and her interactions with various attorneys and law enforcement officials.
This document is page 98 of a legal transcript from July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of lawyer Burt Ocariz and his relationship with lead federal prosecutor Marie Villafona. The questioner also asks if the witness was aware of an alleged attempt by Villafona to have Epstein pay Ocariz to represent the witness, all of which the witness denies knowing.
This document is page 96 of a deposition transcript recorded by Censor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a witness about their knowledge of communications between FBI agents, federal prosecutors (specifically Marie Villafona and Jeff Sloman), and other individuals (Mr. Leopold and Mr. Herman). The questioning specifically probes whether the witness knew if Mr. Herman was allowed to review or discuss a 'draft indictment' with federal prosecutors.
This is page 46 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Tein and defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness confirms that attorney Jeffrey Herman was the lawyer who first sued Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. The questioning turns to whether Herman advanced the witness's family any money, at which point Mr. Leopold objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The witness denies being told by federal prosecutors about reimbursement or entitlement to money from a Mr. Epstein. However, the witness confirms having met with federal prosecutors, who they believe were from the FBI, at their home around the year 2008.
This document is a concordance/index page (Page 154) from a transcript produced by Consor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc. It lists keywords alphabetically from 'V' (Vanity) to 'Y' (Yep), along with their page and line numbers in the source text. Key entities listed include 'Villafona', 'Vince', 'WEISS', and the location 'Wellington'. The document bears a footer date of 07/26/17 and is associated with Public Records Request No. 17-295 and DOJ identifier DOJ-OGR-00033142.
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness denies knowing individuals named Marie Villafona and Jeffrey Sloman but confirms that they know someone named Jeffrey Herman. The questioning also covers a visit by 'two ladies and two guys' to the witness's house and whether any cell phone communication occurred.
This document is page 38 of a deposition transcript from 2008, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012433'. An unnamed witness denies the interviewer's suggestion that they discussed being 'entitled to money from Mr. Epstein' with federal prosecutors and also denies knowing Marie Villafona. The witness does confirm that four federal agents, believed to be from the FBI, visited their home once around 2006 or 2007.
Question asked if FBI agents told witness these two had spoken. Witness answered 'No'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity