This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021858). Attorney Mr. Simpson is questioning a witness about legal agreements existing as of December 30, 2014, specifically regarding a 'common interest privilege' with other attorneys in the 'CVRA case' (Crime Victims' Rights Act). Attorneys Mr. Scarola and Ms. McCawley interject to clarify the scope of the question and assert privilege, with McCawley specifically objecting to revealing information about an agreement (transcribed as 'accountant interest agreement', likely a typo for 'common interest agreement').
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia Roberts | Subject/Plaintiff |
Mentioned as the subject whose attorneys are being discussed regarding common interest privilege.
|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney |
Conducting the questioning (Q).
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney |
Interjecting/Objecting to clarify the scope of the questions.
|
| Ms. McCawley | Attorney |
Interjecting to assert privilege.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Attorney |
Identified as co-counsel to the witness.
|
| The Witness | Witness |
Unidentified 'he'/'him' being questioned about legal agreements.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
"As of December 30th, 2014, were there any attorneys who were sharing a common interest privilege with you as counsel in the CVRA case?"Source
"I'm putting aside Virginia Roberts and I'm putting aside her attorneys."Source
"Well, to the extent that's going to reveal privileged information about accountant interest agreement, I am not going to"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,052 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document