031-01.pdf
52.1 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (final order of dismissal)
File Size:
52.1 KB
Summary
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-CV-80802-MARRA-JOHNSON). Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the case between Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8 and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein dismissed following a settlement stipulation between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 8 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the lawsuit.
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | Judge |
United States District Judge who signed the order.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case was filed.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2010-06
Parties filed Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice.
Southern District of Florida
2010-06-25
Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered on FLSD Docket.
West Palm Beach, Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the judge's chambers where the order was signed.
|
Relationships (1)
Plaintiff vs Defendant in Case No. 09-CV-80802
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,040 characters)
Case 9:09-cv-80802-KAM Document 31-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2010 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-CV-80802-MARRA-JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 8
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
______________________/
______________________/
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice [DE___], filed June , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Prejudice [DE___], filed June , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties'
settlement.
settlement.
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida this ___ day
of June, 2010.
of June, 2010.
KENNETH A. MARRA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies Furnished to:
All Counsel of Record
All Counsel of Record
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document