This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing final rules from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning employer requirements for posting employee rights notices. The rules cover physical posting specifications (size, location) and new requirements for electronic distribution via intranet, internet, or email. Although the user prompt described this as an 'Epstein-related document', the content itself pertains exclusively to U.S. labor law and makes no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals; its relevance may stem from being collected as evidence, as indicated by the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298' Bates stamp.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bonnie Dedmore | Commenter |
Associated with Bonnie Dedmore State Farm, which submitted comments on the proposed rule regarding posting employee r...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) |
The government agency proposing and finalizing the rule for posting employee rights notices.
|
|
| Department of Labor |
A U.S. government department whose notice-posting rules are referenced.
|
|
| Baker & McKenzie |
A law firm representing employers that commented on the proposed rule, specifically on the definition of 'customarily'.
|
|
| The Golub Corporation |
Mentioned in a legal citation (159 NLRB 355, 369 (1966)) as an example of a past Board remedial order.
|
|
| J. Picini Flooring |
Mentioned in a legal citation (356 NLRB No. 9, slip op. at 6 (2010)) related to electronic communication with employees.
|
|
| Buffalo Wild Wings |
An employer that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Associated Milk Producers, Inc. |
An employer that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Smitty's, Inc. |
An employer that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| National Grocers Association |
An organization that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Sorensen/Wille, Inc. |
An employer that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Dr. Pepper Snapple Group |
A company that submitted comments on the proposed rule, objecting to potential bulletin board clutter.
|
|
| Georgia Caremaster Medical Services |
A company that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Homestead Village, Inc. |
A company that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Exodus Designs & Surfaces |
A company that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Bonnie Dedmore State Farm |
An entity that submitted comments on the proposed rule.
|
|
| Council of Smaller [Enterprises/Businesses] |
Mentioned as a commenting party, but the full name is cut off at the bottom of the page.
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Appears as a Bates stamp at the bottom of the document (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298), indicating it was likely collected a...
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Employer's physical premises
|
Notices must be posted in 'conspicuous places, including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted.'
|
|
Required location for electronic posting of notices if the employer customarily communicates with employees this way.
|
|
|
Source where employers can download the official notice poster.
|
"in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted."Source
"customarily"Source
"where other legally-required notices to employees are customarily posted."Source
"safe harbor"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (7,517 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document