Baker & McKenzie
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
National Immigration Law Center
|
Proposed conflicting standards |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Commenter agency |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Regulator commenter |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
The Board (NLRB)
|
Commenter on proposed rule |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Employers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-08-30 | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published its final rule in the Federal Register, which... | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017069.jpg
This document is a page from the attendee directory for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists approximately 50 high-profile individuals, including CEOs, government officials, and journalists from various countries and organizations such as PepsiCo, GE, Microsoft, and the UK Prime Minister's Office. The document contains the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017069', indicating it was likely part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022316.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments and the issuing agency's response to a new labor rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights regarding unionization. The document discusses the economic impact of the rule, its classification under the Congressional Review Act, and its exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act. This document is related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022301.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on posting employee rights notices. It discusses the Board's decisions on public comments concerning electronic posting methods, compliance with Department of Labor rules, and exemptions for certain employers. The document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is strictly related to U.S. labor law and regulatory procedure, and the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022301' likely indicates it was collected as an exhibit for a congressional committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022300.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board. The rule establishes employer obligations for posting notices of employee rights, focusing on requirements for foreign language translations, accessibility for vision-impaired and illiterate employees, and electronic posting. Despite the user's prompt, this document's content is strictly related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing final rules from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning employer requirements for posting employee rights notices. The rules cover physical posting specifications (size, location) and new requirements for electronic distribution via intranet, internet, or email. Although the user prompt described this as an 'Epstein-related document', the content itself pertains exclusively to U.S. labor law and makes no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals; its relevance may stem from being collected as evidence, as indicated by the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298' Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022297.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) analysis and response to public comments on a proposed rule regarding employee rights. It discusses modifications to language about unlawful union conduct, collective bargaining duties, and NLRA coverage. Contrary to the user's prompt, this document is entirely about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022294.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) final rule on a notice of employee rights. The NLRB explains its decision to exclude 'Beck rights' and other union-specific rights from the notice, while including a detailed list of examples of unlawful employer conduct under the NLRA. The document also addresses comments received from various organizations like Baker & McKenzie during the rulemaking process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022293.jpg
This document is page 54022 of the Federal Register from August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). It explains the Board's reasoning for the precise content of a mandatory workplace notice informing employees of their rights under the NLRA, including the right to unionize and the right to refrain from union activity. Despite the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer and the prompt's framing, the document's text is exclusively about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or associated individuals.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity