This letter, dated June 5, 2006, is from Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Gerald B. Lefcourt, to prosecutor Lanna Belohlavek of the Florida State Attorney's Office. Following up on a recent meeting, the attorney argues against Epstein pleading to a felony aggravated assault charge, primarily due to the risk of mandatory sex offender registration. The letter proposes a plea to misdemeanor solicitation as a more suitable resolution and addresses legal arguments to support this, including that the victim need not be legally defined as a "prostitute" for the charge to apply.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Gerald B. Lefcourt | Attorney |
His name is on the letterhead of the law firm sending the letter.
|
| Sheryl E. Reich | Attorney |
Listed on the letterhead of the law firm.
|
| Renato C. Stabile | Attorney |
Listed on the letterhead of the law firm.
|
| Faith A. Friedman | Attorney |
Listed on the letterhead of the law firm.
|
| Lanna Belohlavek | State Attorney's Office employee |
The recipient of the letter, addressed at the Florida State Attorney's Office.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Client |
The subject of the letter (Re: Jeffrey Epstein) and referred to as "the client".
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LAW OFFICES OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. | Law Firm |
The sender of the letter, as indicated by the letterhead.
|
| Florida State Attorney's Office | Government Agency |
The organization where the recipient, Lanna Belohlavek, works.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The address of the law firm Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C.
|
|
|
The location of the law firm Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C.
|
|
|
The address of the Florida State Attorney's Office where the letter was sent.
|
|
|
The location of the Florida State Attorney's Office.
|
|
|
Mentioned in relation to the State Attorney's Office and the location of the potential aggravated assault charge.
|
"the client would not be subjected to sex offender registration requirements in any state or foreign jurisdiction."Source
"we strongly believe that a plea to misdemeanor solicitation is the more appropriate resolution."Source
"the complaining witness need not be a "prostitute" in order to satisfy the elements of the offense."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,228 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document