DOJ-OGR-00013766.jpg
457 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
457 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's knowledge of lawyers Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, from the firm Boies Schiller, representing Virginia Roberts in a separate civil litigation. The witness confirms their knowledge and that they were prepared to testify in that case, despite an objection for relevance which the court overruled.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| A. Farmer | Witness |
The person being cross-examined, designated as 'A.' in the transcript.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Lawyer |
Mentioned as one of the lawyers representing Virginia Roberts in a civil case.
|
| Ms. McCawley | Lawyer |
Mentioned as one of the lawyers representing Virginia Roberts in a civil case.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Client |
The individual being represented by Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards in a civil case.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Lawyer |
A lawyer present in the court proceeding who makes objections.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the proceeding, who rules on objections.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller | company |
A law firm mentioned as the firm from which lawyers in a civil case originated.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court, as indicated by the court reporting agency's name.
|
Relationships (3)
The transcript states that Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards represent Virginia Roberts in a civil case.
The transcript states that Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards represent Virginia Roberts in a civil case.
The questioner asks if the lawyers, including Mr. Edwards, were from the law firm Boies Schiller.
Key Quotes (3)
"And you know that in connection with that civil case, your lawyers, Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, represent Virginia Roberts; correct?"Source
— Q (Questioner)
(Question posed to the witness, A. Farmer, to establish their knowledge of the legal representation in a separate civil case.)
DOJ-OGR-00013766.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Pomerantz, you inquired as to pro bono representation; correct? Is that correct?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge addressing Ms. Pomerantz to establish the basis for overruling her relevance objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00013766.jpg
Quote #2
"All right. I'll overrule."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's ruling on Ms. Pomerantz's objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00013766.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,121 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 267 2203
LCAVMAX6
A. Farmer - cross
LCAVMAX6
A. Farmer - cross
1 civil case, were the same lawyers from Boies Schiller; correct?
2 A. In part.
3 Q. And also Mr. Edwards; correct?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. And you know that in connection with that civil case, your
6 lawyers, Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, represent Virginia
7 Roberts; correct?
8 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Foundation objection?
10 MS. POMERANTZ: Relevance.
11 THE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz, you inquired as to pro bono
12 representation; correct? Is that correct?
13 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: All right. I'll overrule.
15 A. Can you repeat the question?
16 Q. You know that Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards represent
17 Virginia Roberts?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Correct?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. In connection with civil litigation?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And you were prepared to testify in that civil litigation;
24 correct?
25 A. I was.
2 A. In part.
3 Q. And also Mr. Edwards; correct?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. And you know that in connection with that civil case, your
6 lawyers, Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards, represent Virginia
7 Roberts; correct?
8 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Foundation objection?
10 MS. POMERANTZ: Relevance.
11 THE COURT: Ms. Pomerantz, you inquired as to pro bono
12 representation; correct? Is that correct?
13 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: All right. I'll overrule.
15 A. Can you repeat the question?
16 Q. You know that Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards represent
17 Virginia Roberts?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Correct?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. In connection with civil litigation?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And you were prepared to testify in that civil litigation;
24 correct?
25 A. I was.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013766
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document