Event Details
February 15, 2012
Description
Court testimony of Ms. Conrad regarding her juror service.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Gair | person | 86 | View Entity |
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
| Ms. Conrad | person | 69 | View Entity |
| MR. OKULA | person | 182 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009948.jpg
This document is a condensed transcript (pages 221-224) from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, dated February 15, 2012. It features the testimony of Ms. Conrad, a suspended New York attorney who served as a juror in a complex tax shelter fraud case presided over by Judge Pauley. The questioning revolves around her motives for serving on the jury while suspended, specifically whether she used the service to demonstrate stability for her bar reinstatement petition, which she denies.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Court proceedings in US v. Daugerdas involving the examination of witnesses Trzaskoma and Conrad
2012-02-15 • Southern District (implied NY)
Direct examination of juror/witness Conrad regarding her conduct during voir dire.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Conclusion of an evidentiary hearing where the defense and government both rest their cases. The judge then sets requirements for post-hearing briefs.
2022-02-24 • Court
Direct examination of witness Conrad regarding her residency and truthfulness during jury selection.
2012-02-15 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A trial where Ms. Conrad and eleven other jurors rendered a verdict against Paul M. Daugerdas.
2012-02-15 • Federal Court
Ms. Conrad was asked by the Court if she owned any stocks or bonds, to which she replied "none of your business."
2025-12-20 • Federal Court
A date mentioned in a question to Ms. Conrad, possibly related to the trial or a related proceeding.
2011-03-01 • Federal Court
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event