Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order
File Size: 80.1 KB
Summary

This document is a court order from March 30, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sara Kellen (Case No. 09-80469-CIV-MARRA) in the Southern District of Florida. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders counsel to confer and file a joint scheduling and discovery report pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The order outlines specific deadlines for pretrial discovery planning and scheduling conferences.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jane Doe II Plaintiff
Bringing suit against Epstein and Kellen
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Sued by Jane Doe II
Sara Kellen Defendant
Sued by Jane Doe II
Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
Judge signing the order

Organizations (1)

Timeline (1 events)

2009-03-30
Order entered on FLSD Docket requiring counsel to confer and file reports
West Palm Beach, Florida

Locations (2)

Relationships (3)

Jane Doe II Legal Adversary Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff vs Defendant in Case 09-80469-CIV-MARRA
Jane Doe II Legal Adversary Sara Kellen
Plaintiff vs Defendant in Case 09-80469-CIV-MARRA
Jeffrey Epstein Co-Defendants Sara Kellen
Listed together as Defendants in Case 09-80469-CIV-MARRA

Key Quotes (2)

"ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT"
Source
005.pdf
Quote #1
"Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney’s fees and costs."
Source
005.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,927 characters)

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2009 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 09-80469-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE II,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARA KELLEN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT
AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel is
hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), a copy of this order.
It is further ORDERED:
1. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that
motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed
order.
2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 16.1 and
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is
excluded under Rule 26(a)(1)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the
last responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b),
whichever is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the
possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the
disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2009 Page 2 of 2
parties’ views and proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(f).
4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference
outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as
the discovery conference described in Rule 26(f) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter.
See Local Rule 16.1(B).
6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint
scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2). This report shall indicate the proposed
month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an
indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the
scheduling conference report.
8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint
scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including
attorney’s fees and costs.
DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida,
this 30th day of March, 2009.
[Signature]
KENNETH A. MARRA
United States District Judge
Copies furnished to:
All counsel

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document