This document is page 13 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It contains a transcript excerpt from a deposition where Alan Dershowitz questions Ms. McCawley's standing, followed by legal commentary regarding a statement released by Ms. McCawley on behalf of David Boies concerning privileged settlement discussions. The document references depositions of Alan Dershowitz from 2015 and 2016.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley Edwards | Plaintiff |
Named in case title 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz'
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Defendant / Witness |
Named in case title; identified as 'The Witness' in the transcript portion; subject of deposition
|
| Ms. McCawley | Attorney |
Raising objections in deposition; identified as David Boies' law partner
|
| Mr. Scott | Attorney |
Speaking in deposition transcript, managing the witness
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney |
Speaking in deposition transcript, asking questions
|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney |
Speaking in deposition transcript, raising privilege concerns
|
| David Boies | Attorney |
Mentioned as Ms. McCawley's partner; engaged in settlement discussions with Dershowitz
|
| Ms. Giuffre | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned regarding an affidavit in the deposition notes
|
| Cassell | Plaintiff Attorney |
Named in header 'Edwards and Cassells Response'
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by footer stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT
|
"THE WITNESS: No, no, no. Does she have standing in this deposition?"Source
"Because the discussions that Mr. Boies had with Mr. Dershowitz were expressly privileged settlement discussions, Mr. Boies will not, at least at this time, describe what was actually said."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,526 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document