DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif

39 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Report excerpt / legal analysis
File Size: 39 KB
Summary

This document discusses the legal proceedings and agreements related to Epstein, detailing how his sentencing was handled and reduced. It highlights Acosta's role in approving the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and references an email exchange between the State Attorney and Villafaña regarding the resolution of the case. The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) concluded that the agreement allowed Epstein to resolve a federal investigation for an 18-month state sentence.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Krischer Individual mentioned in context of Epstein's case
Responded that Epstein would serve 15 months under the proposal.
Epstein Subject of the legal proceedings
Would serve 15 months; plea to a registrable offense; allowed to plead to one of three charges; sentencing reduced fr...
Villafaña Individual mentioned in context of Epstein's case; OPR interviewee
Told by Krischer about Epstein's plea; responded 'Sounds great' to an email; gave an OPR interview.
Acosta Official who reviewed and approved NPA
Could not recall specifics of the decision to allow Epstein's plea or sentence reduction; was aware of changes; revie...
State Attorney Official who sent an email
Concluded an email regarding the resolution of the case.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
OPR
Office of Professional Responsibility, concluded on the negotiation of an agreement.
Department
Department policy gave Acosta discretion to approve the agreement.
U.S. Attorney
Mentioned in the context of deferring to a state prosecution.
Starbucks
Mentioned in an email about buying a cup of coffee.

Timeline (4 events)

Proposal for Epstein to serve 15 months.
Decision to allow Epstein to plead to one of three charges and reduce sentencing from two years to 18 months.
Acosta reviewing and approving the final NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement).
Negotiation of an agreement allowing Epstein to resolve federal investigation in return for an 18-month state sentence.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Local minimum security detention facility where Epstein would serve time.

Relationships (4)

Krischer involved in legal proceedings/proposal Epstein
Krischer responded that Epstein would serve 15 months.
Krischer communicated information Villafaña
He also told Villafaña that a plea to a registrable offense would not prevent Epstein from serving his time...
Acosta decision-maker/approver Epstein
Acosta could not recall specifically how or by whom the decision was made to allow Epstein to plead... Acosta was aware of these changes. He reviewed and approved the final NPA.
State Attorney corresponded via email Villafaña
The State Attorney concluded his email... Villafaña responded...

Key Quotes (6)

"authorities to let him out early."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif
Quote #1
"at the stockade"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif
Quote #2
"most serious readily provable offense"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif
Quote #3
"Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this is resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a conversation."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif
Quote #4
"Sounds great."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif
Quote #5
"Everybody"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000190.tif
Quote #6

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,710 characters)

127a
authorities to let him out early." Krischer responded
that under the proposal as it then stood, Epstein would
serve 15 months. He also told Villafaña that a plea to
a registrable offense would not prevent Epstein from
serving his time "at the stockade"—the local minimum
security detention facility. 127
***
[139] authority to deviate from the Ashcroft Memo's
"most serious readily provable offense" requirement.
Although Acosta could not recall specifically how or
by whom the decision was made to allow Epstein to
plead to only one of the three charges identified on the
original term sheet, or how or by whom the decision
was made to reduce the sentencing requirement from
two years to 18 months, Acosta was aware of these
changes. He reviewed and approved the final NPA
before it was signed. Department policy gave him the
discretion to approve the agreement, notwithstanding
any arguable failure to comply with the "most serious
readily provable offense" requirement. Furthermore,
the Ashcroft Memo does not appear to preclude a U.S.
Attorney from deferring to a state prosecution, so it is
not clear that the Memo's terms apply to a situation
involving state charges. Accordingly, OPR concludes
that the negotiation of an agreement that allowed
Epstein to resolve the federal investigation in return
for the imposition of an 18-month state sentence did
127 The State Attorney concluded his email: "Glad we could get
this worked out for reasons I I won't put in writing. After this is
resolved I would love to buy you a cup at Starbucks and have a
conversation." Villafaña responded, "Sounds great." When asked
about this exchange during her OPR interview, Villafaña said:
"Everybody
DOJ-OGR-00000190

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document