This document appears to be the footer and signature block of an email from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It contains an excerpt discussing a response by Epstein's legal team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, and Weinberg) to a 'Times editorial' regarding Alexander Acosta and federal sex trafficking allegations. The document includes a link to a Miami Herald article and a strict confidentiality disclaimer noting the information is the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and referencing the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Acosta | Official |
Mentioned in relation to a Times editorial calling for him to be held accountable.
|
| Trump | President (implied) |
Mentioned as 'Trump administration'.
|
| Epstein | Subject |
Subject of the legal defense and editorial.
|
| Kenneth Starr | Attorney |
Identified as a former Epstein lawyer who signed the letter.
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney |
Identified as a former Epstein lawyer who signed the letter.
|
| Lilly Ann Sanchez | Attorney |
Identified as a former Epstein lawyer who signed the letter; appears to be the sender of this email/document.
|
| Martin G. Weinberg | Attorney |
Identified as Epstein's 'current attorney'.
|
| JEE | Owner |
Initials used in the confidentiality disclaimer ('property of JEE'), referring to Jeffrey E. Epstein.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Congress |
Called upon to hold Acosta accountable.
|
|
| Trump administration |
Called upon to hold Acosta accountable.
|
|
| Times |
Refers to a newspaper (likely NYT) that published an editorial.
|
|
| Miami Herald |
Source of the linked article.
|
|
| The LS Law Firm |
Firm of Lilly Ann Sanchez.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
"Epstein’s lawyers said the editorial’s conclusions were “in profound conflict with the reality,” noting that there was no evidence that Epstein committed federal sex trafficking offenses."Source
"It is the property of JEE"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,266 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document