DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
1.18 MB
Extraction Summary
14
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket / case history report (sdny cm/ecf)
File Size:
1.18 MB
Summary
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
People (14)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court orders and trial proceedings.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge signing orders and overseeing the trial.
|
| Dr. Loftus | Witness (Defense) |
Subject of a motion regarding testimony; likely Elizabeth Loftus, an expert on memory.
|
| Alexander Hamilton | Witness (Defense) |
Subject of a motion regarding testimony.
|
| Bobbi Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Present at trial representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Jeff Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Present at trial; author of a letter regarding prior inconsistent statements.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Present at trial representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Laura Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Present at trial representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Representing the government at trial and in filings.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Representing the government at trial and in filings.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Representing the government at trial and in filings.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Prosecutor) |
Representing the government at trial and in filings; filed letters.
|
| Martha Martin | Court Reporter |
Recorded the trial proceedings.
|
| George Malinowski | Court Reporter |
Recorded the trial proceedings.
|
Timeline (2 events)
12/15/2021
Order issued regarding defense witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton
Court Docket
12/16/2021
Jury Trial held
SDNY Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York (Court location)
|
Relationships (4)
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney... Jeff Pagliuca
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney... Christian Everdell
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney... Laura Menninger
Key Quotes (3)
"the court has a duty to protect a witness "from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him""Source
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
Quote #2
"The parties' letter notes "that many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b), and (2) is a statement admissible when the witness affirms that the 3500 material contains the inconsistent statement and also expresses disagreement with the substance.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,065 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page87 of 208
A-83
A-83
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
Memorandum Opinion & Order ***]... Last, the Court emphasizes that while it currently denies the Defense's motion, the Defense may of course raise, and the Court will consider, objections that particular lines of questioning into witnesses' backgrounds or lives are irrelevant, cumulative, intended to harass, or otherwise inappropriate. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness "from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him"). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/16/2021)
12/15/2021
694
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's motion to preclude certain testimony of defense witnesses, dated December 15, 2021. The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m. - A response to the motion with respect to Alexander Hamilton by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 7:00 a.m. - A response to the motion with respect to the other anticipated witnesses by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)
694
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's motion to preclude certain testimony of defense witnesses, dated December 15, 2021. The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m. - A response to the motion with respect to Alexander Hamilton by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 7:00 a.m. - A response to the motion with respect to the other anticipated witnesses by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022)
12/16/2021
551
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes "that many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b), and (2) is a statement admissible when the witness affirms that the 3500 material contains the inconsistent statement and also expresses disagreement with the substance." The parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a letter citing authority (beyond the rule itself) for their respective positions. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to indicate each disputed prior inconsistent statement that was read into the record. Letters must be submitted as soon as possible but no later than today, December 16, 2021, at 10:15 p.m. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to docket their respective letters by tomorrow, December 17, 2021, at 8:00 a.m. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/16/2021) (ap) Modified on 12/17/2021 (ap). (Entered: 12/17/2021)
551
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes "that many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b), and (2) is a statement admissible when the witness affirms that the 3500 material contains the inconsistent statement and also expresses disagreement with the substance." The parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a letter citing authority (beyond the rule itself) for their respective positions. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to indicate each disputed prior inconsistent statement that was read into the record. Letters must be submitted as soon as possible but no later than today, December 16, 2021, at 10:15 p.m. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to docket their respective letters by tomorrow, December 17, 2021, at 8:00 a.m. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/16/2021) (ap) Modified on 12/17/2021 (ap). (Entered: 12/17/2021)
12/16/2021
552
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court denies the motion for the remaining witnesses the Government seeks to preclude. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 12/17/2021)
552
ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court denies the motion for the remaining witnesses the Government seeks to preclude. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 12/17/2021)
12/16/2021
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 12/16/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Martha Martin and George Malinowski Jury trial held. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 12/16/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Martha Martin and George Malinowski Jury trial held. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 12/20/2021)
12/17/2021
549
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 17, 2021 re: Law enforcement witness testimony Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2021)
549
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 17, 2021 re: Law enforcement witness testimony Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2021)
12/17/2021
550
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 16, 2021 re: Prior inconsistent statements Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2021)
550
LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated December 16, 2021 re: Prior inconsistent statements Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2021)
12/17/2021
553
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated December 16, 2021 re: Prior Inconsistent Statements (Pagliuca, Jeffrey)
553
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated December 16, 2021 re: Prior Inconsistent Statements (Pagliuca, Jeffrey)
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1
83/113
DOJ-OGR-00020705
83/113
DOJ-OGR-00020705
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document