019.pdf
80.3 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
80.3 KB
Summary
A court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80309-CIV-MARRA). Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders counsel to confer, file a joint scheduling report, and file a joint discovery report, outlining specific deadlines and procedural rules for the pretrial phase.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 103 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil case against Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the civil case.
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | United States District Judge |
Judge presiding over the case who signed the order.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Timeline (1 events)
2010-04-29
Order requiring counsel to confer and file joint reports signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra.
West Palm Beach, Florida
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (1)
Listed as Plaintiff and Defendant in Case No. 10-80309-CIV-MARRA
Key Quotes (3)
"ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT"Source
019.pdf
Quote #1
"Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 26.1 and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."Source
019.pdf
Quote #2
"Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney’s fees and costs."Source
019.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,907 characters)
Case 9:10-cv-80309-KAM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2010 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-MARRA
JANE DOE NO. 103,
Plaintiff,
vs.
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
_____________________________________/
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT
AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is
hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), a copy of this order.
hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), a copy of this order.
It is further ORDERED:
1. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that
motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed
order.
motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed
order.
2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 26.1 and
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is
excluded under Rule 26(a)(B), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last
responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), whichever
is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a
prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by
Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and
excluded under Rule 26(a)(B), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last
responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), whichever
is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a
prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by
Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and
Case 9:10-cv-80309-KAM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/29/2010 Page 2 of 2
proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(f).
4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference
outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as
the discovery conference described in Rule 26(f) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter.
See Local Rule 16.1(B).
the discovery conference described in Rule 26(f) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter.
See Local Rule 16.1(B).
6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint
scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2)&(3). This report shall indicate the
proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well
as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2)&(3). This report shall indicate the
proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well
as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the
scheduling conference report.
scheduling conference report.
8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint
scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including
attorney's fees and costs.
scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including
attorney's fees and costs.
DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida,
this 29th day of April, 2010.
this 29th day of April, 2010.
KENNETH A. MARRA
United States District Judge
United States District Judge
Copies furnished to:
All counsel
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document