022-01.pdf
44.6 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (final order of dismissal)
File Size:
44.6 KB
Summary
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80309). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case in May 2010 following a stipulation by the parties, noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement reached between the plaintiff and Epstein.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 103 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in civil suit against Epstein
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in civil suit
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | United States District Judge |
Judge signing the dismissal order
|
| Johnson | Judge/Magistrate |
Referenced in Case Number (Marra/Johnson)
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case was filed
|
Timeline (1 events)
2010-05-18
Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice entered, closing the case based on a settlement.
Southern District of Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court chambers where the order was signed
|
Relationships (1)
Plaintiff vs. Defendant in Case 10-CV-80309
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,067 characters)
Case 9:10-cv-80309-KAM Document 22-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2010 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 10-CV-80309-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 103,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
________________________________/
________________________________/
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice (DE ), filed May , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Prejudice (DE ), filed May , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the
pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In
accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties'
settlement.
settlement.
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
Florida this ___ day of May, 2010.
Florida this ___ day of May, 2010.
KENNETH A. MARRA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
All counsel of record
All counsel of record
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document