DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg

481 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 481 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on digital forensics, specifically establishing that the witness cannot determine the physical 'geo location' (whether Florida, New York, or elsewhere) of a desktop computer used to create specific exhibits.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Flatley Witness
Under cross-examination regarding digital forensics and geolocation of devices.
Ms. Pomerantz Attorney (Prosecution)
Raising objections during questioning.
The Court Judge
Ruling on objections (Overruled).
Unidentified Attorney (Q) Defense Counsel
Conducting the cross-examination (implied by the 'Q' label).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court filing date of the transcript document.
Southern District of New York (implied by case number and reporters)
Unknown (Prior to filing)
Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley.
Courtroom

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned as a potential location for the desktop computer.
Mentioned as a potential location for the desktop computer.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Pomerantz Adversarial Defense Counsel (Q)
Pomerantz objects to the questions posed by the cross-examining attorney.

Key Quotes (3)

"Q. You don't have a location, a geo location for any of these particular documents you've been testifying about; correct? A. That's correct."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg
Quote #1
"Q. So the desktop could have been in Florida or in New York or somewhere else; right?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg
Quote #2
"Q. - you don't know where that desktop was living when any of these exhibits were created; correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,131 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 264 1501
LC7Cmax2 Flatley - cross
1 course of that copying; correct?
2 A. That is correct.
3 Q. You just don't have something to compare it to; right?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. If you had the other one, you could run the same program;
6 right?
7 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Overruled.
9 Q. If you had the other one, you could run the same program
10 and make sure that they were identical; right?
11 A. That's correct.
12 Q. So, because you don't have that other thing to compare it
13 to - what you think is a desktop; right?
14 A. Correct.
15 Q. - you don't know where that desktop was living when any of
16 these exhibits were created; correct?
17 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: Overruled.
19 A. No, I don't.
20 Q. Right. You don't have a location, a geo location for any
21 of these particular documents you've been testifying about;
22 correct?
23 A. That's correct.
24 Q. So the desktop could have been in Florida or in New York or
25 somewhere else; right?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013088

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document