This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on digital forensics, specifically establishing that the witness cannot determine the physical 'geo location' (whether Florida, New York, or elsewhere) of a desktop computer used to create specific exhibits.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Flatley | Witness |
Under cross-examination regarding digital forensics and geolocation of devices.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Raising objections during questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on objections (Overruled).
|
| Unidentified Attorney (Q) | Defense Counsel |
Conducting the cross-examination (implied by the 'Q' label).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
"Q. You don't have a location, a geo location for any of these particular documents you've been testifying about; correct? A. That's correct."Source
"Q. So the desktop could have been in Florida or in New York or somewhere else; right?"Source
"Q. - you don't know where that desktop was living when any of these exhibits were created; correct?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,131 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document