Questioner (Q)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sud
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Espinosa (witness)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of a sworn statement. | An unspecified location, no... | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A questioner examines a witness about a document referred to as 'Overt Two' and a related summary... | Unspecified court setting | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness (speaker 'A') is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Jur... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Deposition | A deposition where a witness is being questioned about their preparation and knowledge of case do... | N/A | View |
| 2023-02-28 | N/A | Court proceeding/Hearing regarding questionnaire responses | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | A direct examination of a witness named Dubin was conducted as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Dubin regarding their observations of Ghislaine Maxwell and ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Carolyn. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020899.jpg
This document is a transcript (pages 19-20) from Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell appeal), dated February 28, 2023. It records the questioning of a witness (likely a juror) regarding their completion of a 'thick' jury questionnaire. The witness admits to 'skimming' and 'flying through' questions based on 'if yes' prompts, stating they were distracted and that the process felt like it took hours.
DOJ-OGR-00018443.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, who admits to initiating email contact with Jeffrey Epstein to arrange a meeting and asking to stay at his residence in New York. Ms. Pomerantz objects to several lines of questioning during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00016821.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness. The witness provides the ages (20, 25, 27) and genders of three individuals, states that Mr. Dubin is self-employed in the financial industry, and confirms that she was previously employed as a medical doctor, specifically an internist.
DOJ-OGR-00013903.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about the office layout being a shared open space and confirms that Ghislaine (Maxwell) did not have a private office. The witness also discusses signing a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) to protect Jeffrey Epstein's privacy and client list, noting that signing such agreements was standard practice in their work as an executive assistant for other CEOs.
DOJ-OGR-00010227.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features an interrogation of a juror regarding why they rushed through their jury questionnaire and failed to disclose relevant information. The juror admits that, had they answered question 49 correctly, they would have disclosed that their stepbrother and his friend were accused of sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00009411.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of testimony given by an individual named Edelstein. The testimony concerns the drafting of a legal brief and whether the legal team knowingly omitted information regarding a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad prior to voir dire (jury selection). The witness explains their focus was on establishing identity rather than waiving rights regarding juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00004695.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of Grand Jury testimony (labeled MM20-GJ TESTIMONY) filed on May 25, 2021, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The visible text involves a prosecutor asking a witness (likely an investigator) about independent corroboration of statements made by 'Jane Does' regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they obtained telephone records to corroborate the statement of a specific redacted individual, proving telephonic contact with another redacted party.
DOJ-OGR-00033078.jpg
This document is page 90 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In this excerpt, an unidentified witness is questioned about their preparation for the deposition, which included a meeting with a 'Mr. Leopold' that morning. The witness also confirms they have previously read police reports related to the case and clarifies that a statement they gave to the police was in the form of a narrative police report, not a question-and-answer transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00033077.jpg
This is page 89 of a legal deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. The witness is questioned about whether they or their parents spoke to any law firms other than those of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold. The witness denies speaking to others but asks if 'family court matters.' Ultimately, the witness identifies Mr. Leopold as the person who prepared them for that day's deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021849.jpg
This document is page 26 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. The testimony clarifies that a specific police report documents 'forcible rape of underage girls' and roughly 180 sexual encounters by Jeffrey Epstein over a six-month period at a mansion. The witness confirms the report does not accuse Alan Dershowitz of abuse, but characterizes Epstein as one of Dershowitz's 'closest friends.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021843.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript (House Oversight Committee). A witness, likely a law professor at the University of Utah, explains that faculty members express personal views rather than university endorsements, specifically regarding 'crime victim rights.' The witness details a conversation with the law school Dean who suggested adding a footnote to legal pleadings to clarify this distinction and avoid misunderstanding.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021831.jpg
This is page 8 of a rough draft deposition transcript. The text begins with a procedural discussion between a questioner and a witness regarding how questions should be answered. Mr. Scarola interrupts to ask about a document placed before him, which Mr. Scott confirms is a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book, provided in response to a request made during a previous deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012265.jpg
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript where an individual is questioned about their relationship with Mr. Epstein. The deponent confirms visiting Epstein's house on only one occasion and denies ever traveling with him or leaving the state to meet him, though they heard 'other girls did'. The deponent also denies receiving any email or text communications from a redacted female about sexual activity.
No Subject
The Questioner confirms with the Answerer that they were not coerced and that they told the truth. Mr. Goldberger and Ms. Sanchez then thank the witness for their time.
No Subject
The Questioner confirms with the Answerer that they were not coerced and that they told the truth. Mr. Goldberger and Ms. Sanchez then thank the witness for their time.
No Subject
The Questioner confirms with the Answerer that they were not coerced and that they told the truth. Mr. Goldberger and Ms. Sanchez then thank the witness for their time.
Preparation for deposition and review of police reports.
The questioner asks the deponent about a meeting with Mr. Leopold to prepare for the deposition and about their review of police reports and a prior statement given to the police. The deponent confirms the statement was in the form of a police report.
Mr. Epstein's alleged recruitment of girls for massages a...
A question-and-answer session where a witness describes being asked by Mr. Epstein to bring him 'younger friends' for massages in exchange for payment.
Mr. Epstein's alleged recruitment of girls for massages a...
A question-and-answer session where a witness describes being asked by Mr. Epstein to bring him 'younger friends' for massages in exchange for payment.
An unnamed female's involvement with Mr. Epstein
A questioner interviews a witness about an unnamed female's relationship with Mr. Epstein, including when and how they met, and the duration of their involvement.
Jane Does and High Schools
Discussion about Jane Does attending high schools in Palm Beach County during contact with Epstein and the introduction of flight manifests.
Carolyn's first visit to a house
A questioner cross-examines a witness named Carolyn about her first visit to a specific house approximately 19 years ago, establishing that she was with Virginia Roberts and was taken upstairs.
Maintenance and destruction of books at Mr. Epstein's Pal...
An unidentified questioner (Q) is examining a witness named Alessi (A) about books that came from New York to Palm Beach. The questioning covers the witness's lack of knowledge about potential alterations to the books and confirms that the witness was not responsible for preserving them. The witness states that old books were destroyed and thrown in the garbage whenever new ones were created.
Data entry and reporting process in QuickBooks
A questioner asks a witness, Sud, to describe the process for inputting customer invoice and billing information into the QuickBooks system, including how customer profiles are created and how the system can be searched to generate reports.
Personal and professional background of the witness and M...
A questioner asks a witness about the ages and genders of three individuals, the employment of Mr. Dubin (self-employed in the financial industry), and the witness's own past employment as a medical doctor (internist).
Cross-examination of witness Espinosa and calling of next...
A witness, Espinosa, is questioned and confirms working at Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan office but not his homes. The witness is excused, and the defense calls Raghu Sud to the stand.
Examination regarding Government Exhibit 1B
A questioner directs the witness's attention to Government Exhibit 1B.
Relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein
A questioner is cross-examining a witness named Dubin about their observations of the relationship between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms observing them and states they lived together. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to questions about the nature of their relationship.
Data entry and reporting process in QuickBooks
A questioner asks a witness, Sud, to describe the process for inputting customer invoice and billing information into the QuickBooks system, including how customer profiles are created and how the system can be searched to generate reports.
Jury Questionnaire Process
Testimony regarding distractions during jury selection and failure to disclose stepbrother's sexual abuse accusation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity