Witness (A)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
No prior contact |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Intermediary connection |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q)
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Trzaskoma
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Transactional exploitative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q)
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Professor Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Dubin
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] friend
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
him
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Multiple girls
|
Advocate shared experience |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Individuals
|
Facilitated transport |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Faith
|
Contemporaneously present |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
she
|
Instructed by |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Dunlap
|
Interviewer and interviewee |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of a sworn statement. | An unspecified location, no... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A visit by the witness to an unspecified house for a massage. The witness was told the visit was ... | the house | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness describes their single visit to Mr. Epstein's house. The witness was taken and driven... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition or interview is conducted. A questioner named Jack asks a witness for their pe... | Not explicitly stated, but ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 17-year-old witness was instructed to lie about their age (to say they were 19) before going to... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | A planned half-hour meeting between the witness and Mr. Epstein. The witness had no prior direct ... | over there (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | A witness was brought to a house to give a massage to a man named Jeffrey. She was led upstairs t... | A house with a massage room | View |
| N/A | Grand jury testimony | A questioner examines a witness about a document referred to as 'Overt Two' and a related summary... | Unspecified court setting | View |
| N/A | Testimony | A witness (speaker 'A') is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Jur... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Discussion | Ms. Trzaskoma and the witness discussed the possibility that Juror No. 1 was a suspended lawyer n... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment/solicitation | Mr. Epstein asked a witness if she had any younger friends who would be interested in performing ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection Process | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness working for Jeffrey Epstein | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Completion of a jury questionnaire | A courtroom (described as l... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Interview | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness filling out a questionnaire | A courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition or Interview | Unknown | View |
| 2025-11-20 | N/A | Court appearance mentioned by the witness in the message. | Court | View |
| 2023-02-28 | N/A | Court proceeding/Hearing regarding questionnaire responses | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | A direct examination of a witness named Dubin was conducted as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016821.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness. The witness provides the ages (20, 25, 27) and genders of three individuals, states that Mr. Dubin is self-employed in the financial industry, and confirms that she was previously employed as a medical doctor, specifically an internist.
DOJ-OGR-00010238.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. The text captures testimony from a witness (likely a juror, based on context regarding a questionnaire) defending themselves against potential criminal charges for failing to disclose a history of sexual abuse. The witness argues it was an 'honest mistake' and claims they did not realize their family or friends would learn about the abuse through their subsequent interview or the case proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00010231.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). A witness, likely a juror being questioned post-trial, explains why they answered 'no' to question 25 on a jury questionnaire regarding being a victim of a crime, despite having a history of sexual abuse. The witness states they did not view themselves as a victim at the time and denies trying to manipulate their way onto the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00003087.jpg
A page from a deposition transcript (filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case) where the witness is questioned about recruiting underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies finding 'girls' and insists their job was to find adult professionals (staff), though they acknowledge that Virginia Roberts was 17 years old.
DOJ-OGR-00033070.jpg
This document is page 82 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about their knowledge of specific individuals, including Nick Kowalski and Patrick Thomas. The questioning touches on the witness's past behavior, including an incident where they were reported missing by their father, and allegations regarding Thomas possessing an illegal firearm. The document bears a 2017 date stamp and a DOJ production number.
DOJ-OGR-00033108.jpg
This page of a deposition transcript records the questioning of an unnamed witness regarding their distrust of their stepmother. The witness confirms they have a pending lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein but clarifies they have not received money yet. The interrogator questions the witness about whether their stepmother ever disclosed being arrested for fraud or fired from Hawthorne Aviation; the witness answers 'No' and 'Never' to these inquiries.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017511.jpg
Deposition transcript (pages 82-85) where a law firm partner is questioned by an interrogator named Tonja. The questioning covers fundraisers held in 2009, the hiring of former Palm Beach judge Bill Berger, and internal communications involving an investigator named Mr. Jenne regarding 'causes of action against Epstein' and 'information we need to use' concerning plaintiffs. The witness also confirms the firm had the capability to monitor employee emails and internet activity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017494.jpg
This document contains pages 14-17 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (implied by context of a Ponzi scheme and specific attorneys mentioned). The witness discusses the hiring practices of his law firm, distinguishing between the 'legitimate side' and the 'Ponzi scheme.' He specifically details the hiring of attorneys including Steve Osber and 'Brad' (likely Brad Edwards), noting that he relied heavily on trust and recommendations from existing partners like Gary Farmer, often hiring people without deep background checks if they were vouched for by trusted insiders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021953.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving the House Oversight Committee. Mr. Simpson questions a witness about a woman named Tatiana, specifically regarding her age during a specific flight, confirming she was over 18. The line of questioning then pivots to the legality and social perception of Jeffrey Epstein having a relationship with a 24-year-old woman, prompting an interjection from Mr. Scarola regarding the nature of such a relationship.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021930.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation given the Bates stamp. An emotional witness (likely a victim) defends 'multiple girls' against attacks from the questioning attorney's side and requests a break. During the recess (4:01-4:04 p.m.), Mr. and Mrs. Dershowitz leave the room. Attorney Mr. Simpson then attempts to question Mr. Cassell, but is interrupted by Ms. McCawley noting the witness had stepped out for water.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021846.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The questioning focuses on a legal pleading where the witness is listed as counsel, specifically regarding allegations that Alan Dershowitz participated in the abuse of 'Jane Doe Number 3' (identified in the text as Miss Roberts) and was an eyewitness to sexual abuse. The discussion establishes a timeframe of knowledge regarding these allegations on or before December 30, 2014.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012366.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of an interview with a woman who describes providing a massage to a man, referred to as 'Jeffrey'. She recounts being paid $200, being asked to remove her clothes, and the man masturbating under a towel during the massage. The interviewee notes seeing pictures of naked people in the house and contradicts herself on whether she told the man to stop.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012271.jpg
This is page 16 of a deposition transcript where a witness testifies about being instructed to lie about their age before visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness, who believes they were 17 at the time, states they were told to say they were 19 and did so, motivated by the desire to get money to clear a debt. A name of a person who allegedly gave this instruction is redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012265.jpg
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript where an individual is questioned about their relationship with Mr. Epstein. The deponent confirms visiting Epstein's house on only one occasion and denies ever traveling with him or leaving the state to meet him, though they heard 'other girls did'. The deponent also denies receiving any email or text communications from a redacted female about sexual activity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012259.jpg
This document is page 4 of a deposition transcript from 'onsor & Associates'. An interviewer named Jack questions an anonymous witness about their personal information, such as name, address, and prior legal history, confirming they live in the West Palm Beach area with their son and parents. The witness's personal identifying information is heavily redacted.
Testimony regarding a document referred to as 'Overt Two'
A questioner directs a witness to a document labeled 'Overt Two' and a summary chart on its second page. The witness confirms they see the document and that it refers to topics they have previously testified about. Much of the specific content is redacted.
Jury or Legal Questionnaire
A form the witness had to fill out, which included conditional 'if yes' instructions.
Court dates and plans
Lol hah my baddd...lol yah i got some stupid court shit on the 20th...bullshit...and damn you still have court shit with him? Like after so long wow im sorry... well yah well we will definitely havta make plans for sure..because i miss u tons times a million and no no no i love you...o and p.s. i love ur default pic niggaa. Muah xo.
Exhibit 1
A document containing a footnote clarifying that the address does not imply institutional endorsement.
Professional Background and CVRA Case
Q&A regarding the witness's history as a judge, professor, and private practice attorney, leading into a discussion about the 'underlying CVRA case'.
Unknown
Questioner asks the witness to put aside their communications.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where 'Jack' asks an anonymous witness for their personal details (name, birthday, address), living situation (with son and parents), and prior court history (only minor traffic violations).
No Subject
The witness states they had 'No contact at all' with Mr. Epstein via the internet before their meeting.
No Subject
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
No Subject
The witness confirms they never received an e-mail from Mr. Epstein prior to their meeting.
No Subject
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
No Subject
The questioner confirms that Mr. Epstein never called the witness on the telephone prior to them meeting. The witness states Epstein 'Never knew who I was until I saw him'.
No Subject
The witness confirms they never received an e-mail from Mr. Epstein prior to their meeting.
No Subject
The witness states they had 'No contact at all' with Mr. Epstein via the internet before their meeting.
No Subject
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
No Subject
The questioner confirms that Mr. Epstein never called the witness on the telephone prior to them meeting. The witness states Epstein 'Never knew who I was until I saw him'.
No Subject
The witness confirms they never received an e-mail from Mr. Epstein prior to their meeting.
No Subject
The witness states they had 'No contact at all' with Mr. Epstein via the internet before their meeting.
No Subject
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
No Subject
The witness states they had 'No contact at all' with Mr. Epstein via the internet before their meeting.
No Subject
The questioner confirms that Mr. Epstein never called the witness on the telephone prior to them meeting. The witness states Epstein 'Never knew who I was until I saw him'.
No Subject
The witness confirms they never received an e-mail from Mr. Epstein prior to their meeting.
No Subject
The witness states they had 'No contact at all' with Mr. Epstein via the internet before their meeting.
No Subject
The witness learned of Mr. Epstein through a person whose name is redacted in the transcript.
No Subject
The questioner confirms that Mr. Epstein never called the witness on the telephone prior to them meeting. The witness states Epstein 'Never knew who I was until I saw him'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity