A direct examination of witness Conrad regarding her past statements as a juror, her knowledge of financial transactions, her personal life (including her husband's criminal record), and her failure to disclose a past disciplinary action from the Bar Association during voir dire.
An unnamed questioner conducts a direct examination of witness Conrad, focusing on her failure to disclose that she was an attorney and her allegedly false statements about her residence to Judge Pauley during jury selection.
Attorneys question juror Conrad about omissions and potential lies during voir dire regarding her husband's criminal history, her travel, her suspended legal career, and her motivations for serving on the jury, including a $40/day stipend and curiosity about the case.
A subpoena was served by two U.S. Marshals on Conrad at her home, compelling her to appear at a hearing on December 20th.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity