U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
PersonRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014875.jpg
This document is page 25 of a legal opinion (likely from a Court of Appeals) affirming the sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court upholds the District Court's application of a 'leadership enhancement' to her sentence and validates the court's reasoning regarding the gravity of her conduct and her pivotal role in facilitating the abuse of underage girls. It references specific sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and mentions an individual named Kellen in the context of where the abuse occurred.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $750,000.00 | Fine imposed by District Court | View |
| N/A | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | U.S. District Cou... | $300.00 | Mandatory special assessment | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Received | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
| 2020-12-15 | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | U.S. District Cou... | $28,500,000.00 | Proposed bail application offering mentioned by... | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Received | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
Unknown inquiry
Jury note sent to the court.
Juror 50's public statements
Requesting that the District Court conduct a hearing.
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Treatment of Maxwell
Admonished MDC to ensure Maxwell is subjected only to necessary security protocols.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Question regarding Count Four (4) of the Indictment
Under Count Four (4), if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?
Racketeering
A complaint alleged that Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, Rodriguez, and Marcinkova engaged in a pattern of racketeering involving luring minor children for money.
Jury Questionnaire Accuracy
Juror testified answers were inadvertent mistakes and did not affect impartiality.
Denial of motion
Denied Maxwell's motion for a new trial.
Requesting a hearing
Requesting a hearing upon learning of interviews.
Requesting a hearing
Request for hearing upon learning of interviews.
Request for a hearing regarding juror interviews
The Government filed a letter requesting a hearing after learning about interviews with jurors.
Motion for new trial
Moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.
Request for a hearing
The Government filed a letter on January 5, 2022, requesting a hearing after learning of interviews.
Request to modify MDC operations
Maxwell sought an order directing the MDC to modify its operations or justify its procedures.
Doc. 196, n.2
Alleged that Maxwell caused her cell to smell by not flushing the toilet.
Notice of Appeal
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet as to Ghislaine Maxwell.
CVRA Litigation Declaration
Explanation of the rationale for terminating the federal investigation.
Granting of Rule 54(b) judgments
Court granted joint request
Rule 54(b) final judgments
Request for final judgments in favor of defendants
Notice of Supplemental Authority
Bringing attention to Seventh Circuit's decision in Boim v. Holy Land Foundation.
Petition regarding NPA
Petition seeking access to and invalidation of the non-prosecution agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity