The court questions a witness about their failure to raise an issue concerning Juror No. 1, in light of the replacement of Juror No. 11.
A questioner interrogates witness Edelstein about whether they could have researched Catherine Conrad on May 12th. The questioning then shifts to what Theresa Trzaskoma told the witness about Conrad's status as a suspended New York attorney. The witness denies being told about a 'suspension report' but confirms being told there was a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
An unnamed questioner asks Dr. Rocchio to explain how recent articles, such as one by Winters, respond to concerns from an earlier article by Bennett and O'Donohue. Dr. Rocchio explains Winters' statistical study on grooming behaviors and then begins to define the concept of 'error rates' in psychology.
A witness, A. Farmer, is questioned about a trip to New Mexico, their knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement, the timing of the trip (a weekend), and discussions about it with their mother and the government.
A questioner cross-examines a witness named Jane about her prior statements to the government regarding whether Epstein decided where people sat in movie theaters. An attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to the line of questioning.
A witness named Jane is cross-examined about her interactions with Ghislaine and Epstein and her prior statements to the government. An attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to a question, and the court instructs the questioner to rephrase.
A witness is questioned about an envelope (CE3) and a photograph (CE4). The witness identifies a person named 'Jane' in the photograph and is asked about an inscription on it before being interrupted by Mr. Everdell.
A witness, A. Farmer, is questioned about their knowledge of Ms. McCawley and Mr. Edwards representing Virginia Roberts in a civil case. The witness confirms this knowledge and that they were prepared to testify. An objection by Ms. Pomerantz regarding relevance is overruled by the court.
A questioner cross-examines Sergeant Dawson about what Juan Alessi told him regarding the removal of $5,600. The court then adjourns for the night and instructs the jury.
A witness (A) answers questions from a questioner (Q) about locations on a property as depicted in a video. The locations identified include a cabana, a storage building, and 'the barracks'. MS. COMEY then concludes the video presentation, and THE COURT addresses the jury.
A witness, Visoski, is questioned about Ms. Maxwell's travel frequency on Mr. Epstein's planes, her appearance, and is asked to identify her in the courtroom. The witness states Ms. Maxwell's travel decreased around 2004-2005 and positively identifies her as the defendant present in court.
A witness named Parkinson describes the interior of a dwelling as shown in a video, identifying various rooms and two notable photographs: one of Pope John Paul with Jeffrey Epstein, and another of Fidel Castro with Jeffrey Epstein.
A questioner is examining a witness about an envelope (CE3) and a photograph (CE4). The witness identifies the person in the photograph as 'Jane' and confirms there is an inscription on it.
Ms. Menninger questions witness Ms. Farmer about a pair of cowboy boots, marked as exhibit AF9. The witness confirms they were collected by the FBI from her home in Texas and were originally bought for her by Mr. Epstein.
A transcript of a cross-examination where Carolyn is questioned about a prior statement to the FBI regarding an offer of $300 from Virginia.
A questioner cross-examines witness Jane about the timeline of her first meeting with certain individuals, which she previously stated was in September 2019. Jane admits her previously stated timeline was wrong. The questioning also references her repeating the story in December 2019 and February 2020.
A court transcript where a judge questions a witness about their law firm's failure to disclose information, the replacement of Juror No. 11, and a prior discussion about Juror No. 1.
A dialogue in court where Government Exhibit 10 is admitted into evidence without objection, followed by defense attorney Mr. Shechtman calling his first witness, Paul Schoeman, who is then sworn in.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity