| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-01-01 | Investigation | The United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted their own i... | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Investigation | An investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's background and any offenses committed against the United ... | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Federal investigation period into Epstein's background and offenses against the United States. | United States | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | Period of investigation into offenses committed by Epstein against the United States. | United States | View |
This page appears to be an excerpt from a memoir or report (possibly by Paul Krassner) contained within a House Oversight document production. It details correspondence with US Attorney James L. Browning, Jr. concerning whether comments made by comedian Groucho Marx constituted a threat against Richard Nixon. The text notes that the FBI had opened a file on Marx, labeling him a 'national security risk,' and recounts a 1976 appearance by Marx at the Los Angeles Book Fair.
This document details multiple instances of sexual assault by Epstein against minor females, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, who were 13 or 14 years old at the time. It highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during depositions when questioned about these activities, and notes that the victims were brought to his home by another underage victim. The United States Attorney's Office recognized L.M. as a victim.
This document is page 4 of Brad Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Edwards argues that Epstein's claims of wrongdoing against him are unsubstantiated and that Edwards had no involvement in the Scott Rothstein fraud. The text explicitly states Epstein is a 'serial molester of minors' (citing Virginia Roberts' statement) and references Epstein's guilty plea and agreement with the US Attorney's Office regarding payments to approximately 34 victims.
This is page 8 (the signature page) of a legal letter dated May 19, 2008, addressed to Mark Filip. Attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley request that the recipient review the case and discontinue federal involvement, arguing that the matter should be closed by the State and that current federal attempts involve an overreach of statutes. They request a meeting to discuss these issues of federalism and selectivity. The letter mentions U.S. Attorney Acosta.
This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News (reprinted from the Miami Herald) details how federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 to bowing to pressure from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team, led by Kenneth Starr, regarding the non-prosecution agreement and victim notifications. It highlights the disparity between Epstein's lenient treatment—including work release and a private jail section—and the severity of his crimes involving dozens of underage girls. The document also references the 2008 sentencing hearing, the FBI's unfiled 2007 indictment, and the frustrations of local law enforcement officers like Detective Joseph Recarey.
This FBI Electronic Communication from October 7, 2008, requests the assistance of Assistant Legal Attachés at unspecified US Embassies to hand-deliver Victim Notification Letters to victims residing overseas. The letters, originating from the US Attorney's Office, inform the victims about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the US Government and Jeffrey Epstein. The document notes that Epstein was incarcerated at the Palm Beach County Stockade serving an 18-month sentence at the time.
This document is a standard informational brochure from the FBI regarding the 'Help for Victims of Crime' program. It details the Victim Notification System (VNS), providing contact numbers and hours for victims to check on case status. It also includes a 'Limited Confidentiality Statement' warning victims that information shared with a Victim Specialist may be shared with FBI agents or the US Attorney's Office if it pertains to safety, emergencies, child abuse, or the investigation. The document includes blank fields for contact names and case numbers, indicating it is an unused or template copy found within the document production.
An FBI FD-302 report documenting a February 2, 2007 interview with a male employee of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence regarding an investigation into the sexual exploitation of minors. The interviewee detailed Epstein's travel habits, noting he exclusively flew private (Gulfstream or Boeing 727) and split most of his time between Palm Beach and the U.S. Virgin Islands, with additional properties in New Mexico and Paris.
This document describes the author's emotional reaction to being informed by the United States Attorney's Office that she was an identified victim of Jeffrey Epstein. It details her shock and the painful memories resurfacing, her husband's support, and her decision to pursue a lawsuit against Epstein despite the perceived failures of the justice system in his initial sentencing. The author expresses ongoing anger and concern over Epstein's continued behavior and the lack of true justice for his victims.
This document contains an email from Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'J' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to 'Ken' dated December 13, 2018. The email body includes a lengthy draft article or statement intended for a law journal that attempts to whitewash Epstein's past crimes as a 'non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement.' The text aggressively defends the original state plea deal, criticizes federal prosecutors for overreach, and characterizes Epstein as a philanthropist who has paid his debt to society.
An email chain from December 2018 involving Jeffrey Epstein, his lawyers (Ken Starr, Alan Dershowitz), and PR advisors (Michael Wolff, Matthew Hiltzik) strategizing a defense against renewed scrutiny of Epstein's 2008 plea deal. Ken Starr drafts a statement arguing the federal government overstepped in a local matter and defending the plea deal as appropriate, characterizing Epstein's crimes merely as 'solicitation of prostitution.' Michael Wolff suggests deflecting blame by highlighting Epstein's connections to Bill Clinton and framing the current scrutiny as a political attack on Trump Labor Secretary Alex Acosta.
This document appears to be a page from an investigative report (likely the Miami Herald) detailing the aftermath of the Epstein non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the unusual coordination between federal prosecutors and Epstein's defense team regarding victim notification, contrasts Ken Starr's defense of Epstein with his prosecution of Clinton, and features quotes from Detective Recarey expressing regret that Epstein avoided prison and that victims were labeled prostitutes.
This document serves as a narrative summary of the tense negotiations between the US Attorney's Office (Acosta, Sloman) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Lefkowitz, Starr) around 2008. It details how Epstein's lawyers aggressively pressured the government to prevent victim notification, leading to a secret non-prosecution agreement while the FBI briefly continued investigating in NY and NM. The text notes that in 2013, the government finally admitted they backed down on victim notifications due to objections from Epstein's attorneys.
This document is an email from 'J' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) to 'ken' dated December 13, 2018, containing a draft article for a law journal. The article presents a strong defense of Epstein, arguing that he was unfairly treated by federal prosecutors compared to state prosecutors and that he has since paid his debt to society through a jail sentence and millions in payments to victims. The author contends that Epstein has lived an 'exemplary life' for over ten years and this 'unhappy chapter' should be closed.
This document is an email from 'J' to 'ken' dated December 13, 2018, containing a draft article for a law journal. The article is a robust defense of Jeffrey Epstein, arguing he has paid his debt to society for past 'misdeeds' and should be allowed to move on. It criticizes the federal prosecution's 'overreach' in his case and portrays Epstein positively as a philanthropist and a 'trusted friend' of his legal team.
This document is a transcript of page 2 of a taped FBI interview conducted on April 24, 2007, at 4:21 p.m. FBI Agents Jason Richards and Nesbit Kirkendul, along with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Bilafonia, are interviewing an unnamed woman who is present with her attorney, Jim Eisenberg, and his investigator, Carrie Sheehan. The interview is taking place pursuant to a subpoena, and the initial questioning focuses on confirming the interviewee's basic information, such as date of birth and address, which are redacted in the document.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity