Jeffrey Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Correspondent |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell filed a MOTION for New Trial. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell filed a REPLY TO RESPONSE to the motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-13 | N/A | Filing of Defense Response to Motion In Limine | NYSD Court (via email) | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Filing of multiple Motions in Limine by Defense and Opposition Memoranda by Government | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response, a reply memorandum, and memo endorsements were filed and ... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response to a motion, and a reply memorandum were filed and entered... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Submission of Maxwell's Response to Government's Motion In Limine to Preclude Expert Testimony of... | NYSD (New York Southern Dis... | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Multiple motions in limine and responses entered into the docket. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Submission of Rule 16(b)(1)(C) Disclosures for U.S. v. Maxwell | Email correspondence | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Reference to the Accusers as "Victims" or "Minor Victims" (Doc 395) ... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony About Any Alleged "Rape" by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc 394) file... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on Octobe... | 358 El Brillo Way | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification (Doc 392) filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019574.jpg
This document is a legal reply from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 24, 2020. It supports a request to modify a protective order to allow Maxwell to disclose to an adversary in a separate civil litigation that said adversary has already provided materials to the U.S. Attorney's Office via subpoena. The document argues against the government's stance that the civil litigation is unrelated and that disclosure would jeopardize the criminal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00019563.jpg
This document is a letter motion filed on September 2, 2020 (dated August 17), from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Maxwell requests permission to use specific discovery materials produced by the government in early August 2020 in redacted 'Other Matters' (likely separate legal proceedings). The document contains significant redactions concealing the specific nature of these other matters and the content of the discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00019490.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 21, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of his client, Ghislaine Maxwell, Pagliuca requests a court order to prohibit the government and its agents from making extrajudicial statements about her case. The letter argues that such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by an impartial jury, citing legal precedents to support the court's authority to issue such an order.
DOJ-OGR-00019466.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 20-3061, dated September 18, 2020, detailing proceedings related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in July 2020. Key events include attorney appearances, motions regarding Maxwell's detention, her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, and Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders denying bail, remanding Maxwell, and setting a trial date for July 12, 2021. The docket also establishes deadlines for discovery and motions in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019253.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated September 9, 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan detailing procedures for public and media access to hearings via phone and video feed, given COVID-19 restrictions. The docket entries list filings from mid-July 2020, including attorney appearances for Maxwell, motions regarding her detention, and a minute entry for her arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty, was denied bail, and remanded into custody.
DOJ-OGR-00016914.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell presents stipulations agreed upon by both parties, including the birth date of Mike Wallace and the opening dates of *The Lion King* on Broadway. The page concludes with the beginning of a written stipulation regarding a witness named 'Kate' attending a meeting with prosecutors in September, listing the full legal teams for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00013210.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to admit a prior document for 'impeachment by omission,' stating that the witness (Carolyn) filed a complaint and was interviewed by the FBI in 2008 regarding sexual abuse by Epstein and his employee Sarah Kellen, but notably failed to mention Ghislaine Maxwell at that time. Pagliuca argues this contradicts the government's current narrative which emphasizes Maxwell's role while downplaying Kellen's.
DOJ-OGR-00009084.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on February 24, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The potential juror denies having any personal or familial connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. As the juror answered 'No' to all questions, the follow-up section for explanation is left blank.
DOJ-OGR-00019815.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details procedural battles regarding the redaction of sensitive information in pre-trial motions and disputes over Maxwell's access to a laptop at the MDC Brooklyn detention center. The defense filed multiple significant motions on February 4, 2021, including motions to suppress evidence from a subpoena to a redacted party and motions to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment based on pre-indictment delay and arguments that alleged misstatements were not perjurious.
DOJ-OGR-00019814.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for Case 21-58 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering entries from January 12 to January 25, 2021. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records to the USCA, the payment of appeal fees, and a dispute between the Bureau of Prisons and the Court regarding Maxwell's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery. Additionally, it lists multiple motions filed by Maxwell's defense team on January 25 to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment and request a separate trial.
DOJ-OGR-00019803.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court activities from July 13 to July 27, 2020. Key events include her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the court's decision to grant the government's motion to detain her pending trial, the setting of discovery deadlines, and various motions and orders related to attorney appearances and extrajudicial statements. The document outlines the initial procedural steps in the case following her arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00019792.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from Case 21-58, dated March 24, 2021, listing a series of court filings from February 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The filings primarily consist of motions from Maxwell's defense team to suppress evidence, dismiss charges, and obtain pretrial disclosures, along with supporting memoranda and affidavits. The log also records letters to Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning Maxwell's conditions of pretrial confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00019791.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from early 2021 (Jan 26 - Feb 4) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details various filings including letters regarding redactions and laptop access at the MDC, and significant defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss multiple counts of the indictment. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders regarding redaction timelines and denied a request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate a previous order.
DOJ-OGR-00019790.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details legal proceedings including the filing of multiple motions to dismiss charges and request separate trials, the assignment of an appellate case number (21-0058), and a dispute between the Court and the Bureau of Prisons regarding Maxwell's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials. Attorneys Mark Cohen, Christian Everdell, and Jeffrey Pagliuca are listed as filing documents on Maxwell's behalf.
DOJ-OGR-00019779.jpg
This document is a court docket from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the denial of her bail, and the setting of a trial date for July 2021. The docket also records various motions and orders concerning legal representation, discovery schedules, and rules of conduct for the parties involved.
DOJ-OGR-00019766.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from a legal case, detailing a series of court filings in February 2021 related to Ghislaine Maxwell. On February 4, 2021, Maxwell's defense team filed numerous motions to suppress evidence and dismiss various charges from the superseding indictment. The log also records subsequent sealed filings and letters to Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning Maxwell's pretrial confinement conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019764.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the granting of laptop access for discovery review, a subsequent request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate that order, and the filing of multiple motions by Maxwell's defense team to dismiss charges or separate trials. It also records the transmission of appeal records to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019753.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July 2020 detailing legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell, including her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty and was denied bail. It records the appearance of her legal team (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the scheduling of her trial for July 2021, and the judge's orders regarding extrajudicial statements and the rejection of letters from non-parties. The document also lists various filings related to protective orders and discovery deadlines.
DOJ-OGR-00009775.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-000389-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. The respondent, identified as Juror ID 50, attests that they do not personally know and have had no dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The juror's negative responses indicate no known conflicts of interest with the key legal figures in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00009677.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror ID 50 attests that they do not know and have no past or present dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The responses indicate no declared conflicts of interest between the potential juror and the key legal figures in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005365.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.
DOJ-OGR-00005332.jpg
This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00005295.jpg
This document is page 19 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It asks potential jurors to disclose any personal connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) and their respective law firms. It also asks about any connections to the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, or her staff, to assess potential bias for jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00005226.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 14, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, confirming November 15, 2021, as the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 concerning the admissibility of evidence of an alleged victim's sexual behavior, clarifying its distinction from a motion in limine and its specific procedural requirements.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 under seal and plans to notify alleged victims' counsel.
Response to Government Letters dated May 4, and May 6, 20...
Defense response arguing for the production of a journal, boots, and photographs, and criticizing the government's handling of evidence controlled by BSF.
Response to the Government’s October 7, 2020 letter, Unit...
Complaint regarding the Government's failure to meet discovery deadlines and promises regarding files from the Southern District of Florida.
Reply in Support of Request to Modify Protective Order (U...
Legal argument regarding the disclosure of information to a 'Civil Litigation' party about materials handed over to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Request to Modify Protective Order
Requesting permission to disclose certain discovery materials under seal to Judge Preska in civil case.
Request to Modify Protective Order (UNDER SEAL) - United ...
Request for an Order allowing Maxwell to refer to and file under seal certain discovery materials in redacted 'Other Matters'.
Modification of Protective Order
Motion seeking modification of protective order and to file under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to the presiding judge requesting an order to prohibit the Government, its agents, and witnesses' counsel from making extrajudicial statements that could be prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A request to the Court to issue an order prohibiting the Government, its agents, and counsel for witnesses from making extrajudicial statements about the case to protect Ghislaine Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Requesting order prohibiting Government/agents from making extrajudicial statements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity