Jeffrey Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Correspondent |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell filed a MOTION for New Trial. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell filed a REPLY TO RESPONSE to the motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-13 | N/A | Filing of Defense Response to Motion In Limine | NYSD Court (via email) | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Filing of multiple Motions in Limine by Defense and Opposition Memoranda by Government | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response, a reply memorandum, and memo endorsements were filed and ... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response to a motion, and a reply memorandum were filed and entered... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Submission of Maxwell's Response to Government's Motion In Limine to Preclude Expert Testimony of... | NYSD (New York Southern Dis... | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Multiple motions in limine and responses entered into the docket. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Submission of Rule 16(b)(1)(C) Disclosures for U.S. v. Maxwell | Email correspondence | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Reference to the Accusers as "Victims" or "Minor Victims" (Doc 395) ... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony About Any Alleged "Rape" by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc 394) file... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on Octobe... | 358 El Brillo Way | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification (Doc 392) filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
DOJ-OGR-00011707.jpg
This document is a transcript of the defense's opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that the jury must focus solely on whether the government can prove the charges against Maxwell, not on the actions of Epstein. She characterizes the prosecution's case as weak, asserting it relies on the testimony of four accusers whose memories are unreliable, corrupted over 25 years, and motivated by a desire for money.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014121.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service dated October 21, 2016, signed by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley. It certifies the electronic filing and service of a legal document to attorneys Laura A. Menninger and Jeffrey Pagliuca of the firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. in Denver, Colorado. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 under seal and plans to notify alleged victims' counsel.
Response to Government Letters dated May 4, and May 6, 20...
Defense response arguing for the production of a journal, boots, and photographs, and criticizing the government's handling of evidence controlled by BSF.
Response to the Government’s October 7, 2020 letter, Unit...
Complaint regarding the Government's failure to meet discovery deadlines and promises regarding files from the Southern District of Florida.
Reply in Support of Request to Modify Protective Order (U...
Legal argument regarding the disclosure of information to a 'Civil Litigation' party about materials handed over to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Request to Modify Protective Order
Requesting permission to disclose certain discovery materials under seal to Judge Preska in civil case.
Request to Modify Protective Order (UNDER SEAL) - United ...
Request for an Order allowing Maxwell to refer to and file under seal certain discovery materials in redacted 'Other Matters'.
Modification of Protective Order
Motion seeking modification of protective order and to file under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to the presiding judge requesting an order to prohibit the Government, its agents, and witnesses' counsel from making extrajudicial statements that could be prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A request to the Court to issue an order prohibiting the Government, its agents, and counsel for witnesses from making extrajudicial statements about the case to protect Ghislaine Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Requesting order prohibiting Government/agents from making extrajudicial statements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity