Jeffrey Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Correspondent |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell filed a MOTION for New Trial. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | Ghislaine Maxwell filed a REPLY TO RESPONSE to the motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-22 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings in USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-13 | N/A | Filing of Defense Response to Motion In Limine | NYSD Court (via email) | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Filing of multiple Motions in Limine by Defense and Opposition Memoranda by Government | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response, a reply memorandum, and memo endorsements were filed and ... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-12 | Court filing | Multiple motions in limine, a response to a motion, and a reply memorandum were filed and entered... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Submission of Maxwell's Response to Government's Motion In Limine to Preclude Expert Testimony of... | NYSD (New York Southern Dis... | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Multiple motions in limine and responses entered into the docket. | SDNY | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Submission of Rule 16(b)(1)(C) Disclosures for U.S. v. Maxwell | Email correspondence | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Reference to the Accusers as "Victims" or "Minor Victims" (Doc 395) ... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Preclude Testimony About Any Alleged "Rape" by Jeffrey Epstein (Doc 394) file... | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on Octobe... | 358 El Brillo Way | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-29 | Court filing | MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification (Doc 392) filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
EFTA00010217.pdf
This document is an email from Nicole Simmons (Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.) to Judge Nathan's chambers in the U.S. v. Maxwell case, dated November 13, 2021. It serves as a transmittal for filing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The filing was submitted under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions by the government.
EFTA00010180.pdf
A discovery letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated November 11, 2021. The letter details the production of 'Amazon records' (Bates SDNY_GM_02771981-02771983) which were sourced from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and potentially duplicate materials previously produced from the Florida FBI file.
EFTA00010162.pdf
A letter dated November 16, 2021, from US Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses, as well as materials related to individuals the government does not currently intend to call. It specifies that these materials are subject to a protective order and explains the specific labeling used to distinguish them from classified documents.
EFTA00010160.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 16, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves as a cover letter for the production of discovery materials, specifically AT&T records, phone records, and photographs, noting that these materials are subject to a protective order.
EFTA00010133.pdf
This document is a discovery letter dated November 9, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It details the production of 'SDFL Files' (likely Southern District of Florida files) with Bates numbers SDNY_GM_02767074 through SDNY_GM_02771980. The letter notes these materials are confidential under a protective order and appear to be duplicative of previous discovery.
EFTA00010017.pdf
A discovery letter dated November 9, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of 'Business Records from SDFL Files' (Bates SDNY_GM_02767074 - 02771980), which the government notes are likely duplicative of materials previously produced from Florida FBI files in 2020. The letter also clarifies confidentiality designations under the Protective Order.
DOJ-OGR-00018362.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a stipulation agreed upon by the prosecution and defense regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson to avoid recalling him to the stand. Defense attorney Christian Everdell reads the stipulation into the record, which concerns a cardboard box (Government Exhibit 294) recovered during a search.
DOJ-OGR-00014878.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The judge outlines the case schedule, noting that jury selection began on November 4th and the trial is set to commence on November 29th, and sets the agenda to address the defendant's motions to exclude evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00008312.jpg
This document is a transcript from a final pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 10, 2021. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The court outlines the plan for jury selection, which is scheduled to conclude on "Monday morning, the 29th," and notes that unused jurors are being kept on call at the recommendation of the jury department.
DOJ-OGR-00001805.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on October 23, 2020, by attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues that the Government has failed to meet discovery deadlines promised during the July 14, 2020, initial conference, particularly regarding investigative files from the Southern District of Florida. The letter criticizes the Government's recent production as lacking substance, noting it consists largely of civil litigation documents and old records related to Jeffrey Epstein rather than the charged conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00001752.jpg
This document is a letter motion dated August 17, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca on behalf of his client, defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion requests a modification of the existing protective order to allow Maxwell's defense to refer to and file under seal certain discovery materials provided by the government on August 5 and August 13, 2020. The defense argues this is necessary for the fair determination of issues in what is referred to as the "Other Matters".
DOJ-OGR-00001635.jpg
This is a legal letter dated July 21, 2020, from Jeffrey Pagliuca of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. The attorney, representing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, requests that the court issue an order prohibiting the U.S. Government and its affiliates from making extrajudicial statements about the case, arguing such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000898.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering filings between February 4, 2021, and February 16, 2021. It details numerous defense motions filed by Maxwell's legal team (Cohen, Pagliuca) to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage, alongside multiple sealed documents. The log also records correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000897.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00000896.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2021 detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the granting of laptop access for discovery review, a subsequent request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate that order, and the filing of multiple defense motions to dismiss charges or separate trials. The document lists attorneys Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, and Jeffrey Pagliuca acting on Maxwell's behalf before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00000885.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded Not Guilty, the denial of her bail, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and various orders regarding discovery scheduling and extrajudicial statements. The document records the presence of defense attorneys Mark Cohen, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Christian Everdell, as well as government prosecutors Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00000860.jpg
This document is a court docket log from February 2021 for Case 21-770 involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of numerous defense motions including attempts to suppress evidence, dismiss counts based on time-bars and a non-prosecution agreement, and strike surplusage. The log also records the filing of sealed documents and correspondence between attorneys (both defense and prosecution) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00000859.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00000858.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing legal activities related to Ghislaine Maxwell between January 12 and January 25, 2021. The entries record the transmission of an appeal, a dispute over Maxwell's access to a laptop for discovery review involving the Bureau of Prisons, and the filing of numerous pretrial motions by her legal team to dismiss various charges. The document highlights the procedural back-and-forth between the defense, the court, and the Bureau of Prisons in the pretrial phase of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000847.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. It records various court orders, including the granting of a detention motion, an arraignment where Maxwell pleaded not guilty, scheduling for discovery and trial, and rulings on motions regarding extrajudicial statements. Key participants include Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and various attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00020930.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) filed on March 9, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The juror confirms they have no personal or familial relationships with the defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The document contains handwritten 'X' marks indicating negative responses to questions regarding potential conflicts of interest.
DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 12, 2021. It details orders regarding strict COVID-19 protocols for an upcoming in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including the use of overflow courtrooms for the public. Additionally, it includes an order addressing a Government motion, where the Judge rules that limiting cross-examination of pseudonymous witnesses regarding their careers would violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights, though specific employer names cannot be elicited.
DOJ-OGR-00020689.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY (Case 22-1426/20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021. It details multiple 'Motions in Limine' filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca) seeking to suppress evidence, including items seized from 358 El Brillo Way in 2005, expert testimony, and specific government exhibits. The document also includes the Government's opposition to these motions and an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding public access and sealing procedures.
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020681.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, printed in 2023 as part of an appeal or related filing. It lists filings from late October and early November 2021, including multiple Motions in Limine by the defense attempting to exclude evidence regarding 'flight' logs, terms like 'victim', items seized from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way, and alleged rape by Jeffrey Epstein. It also includes judicial orders regarding hearing schedules for Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and Daubert (expert witness) motions, as well as orders regarding legal mail issues at the MDC.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 under seal and plans to notify alleged victims' counsel.
Response to Government Letters dated May 4, and May 6, 20...
Defense response arguing for the production of a journal, boots, and photographs, and criticizing the government's handling of evidence controlled by BSF.
Response to the Government’s October 7, 2020 letter, Unit...
Complaint regarding the Government's failure to meet discovery deadlines and promises regarding files from the Southern District of Florida.
Reply in Support of Request to Modify Protective Order (U...
Legal argument regarding the disclosure of information to a 'Civil Litigation' party about materials handed over to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Request to Modify Protective Order
Requesting permission to disclose certain discovery materials under seal to Judge Preska in civil case.
Request to Modify Protective Order (UNDER SEAL) - United ...
Request for an Order allowing Maxwell to refer to and file under seal certain discovery materials in redacted 'Other Matters'.
Modification of Protective Order
Motion seeking modification of protective order and to file under seal.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to the presiding judge requesting an order to prohibit the Government, its agents, and witnesses' counsel from making extrajudicial statements that could be prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A request to the Court to issue an order prohibiting the Government, its agents, and counsel for witnesses from making extrajudicial statements about the case to protect Ghislaine Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Requesting order prohibiting Government/agents from making extrajudicial statements.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity