MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Accomplices |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror defendant |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The District Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Abuser victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-4
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Groomer victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017074.jpg
This document is a legal summation from a court case, outlining Ghislaine Maxwell's role in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation from 1995 to 2004. It details how Maxwell recruited, groomed, and abused multiple young women, including Jane, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn, across various locations like New Mexico and Palm Beach. The text also highlights significant financial payments from Epstein to Maxwell, totaling over $23 million, and describes the evolution of the abuse into a 'pyramid scheme' where victims were incentivized to recruit others.
DOJ-OGR-00017073.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by 'Ms. Moe', likely a prosecutor, arguing for the guilt of Maxwell. The speaker details over $30 million in payments from Jeffrey Epstein to Maxwell between 1999 and 2007, positing that this money was payment for Maxwell's role as a coconspirator in Epstein's sexual abuse of underage girls. The argument connects these payments to a timeline of abuse starting in 1994 with victims identified as 'Jane' and 'Kate'.
DOJ-OGR-00017072.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of Maxwell. The prosecution argues that Maxwell is guilty, citing a 'pyramid scheme' to recruit underage girls for sexual abuse, a 'little black book' containing victim names as evidence of her knowledge, and a significant financial motive. The summation states that Jeffrey Epstein paid Maxwell approximately $30 million between 1999 and 2007 for her role as his 'partner in crime'.
DOJ-OGR-00017070.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell's contact book entries for 'massages' were not legitimate, using the entry for Virginia Roberts as a key example. She connects Maxwell to Virginia through her father, Sky Roberts, an employee at Mar-a-Lago where they met, and through flight records showing Virginia flew with Maxwell when she was 17.
DOJ-OGR-00017069.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Ms. Moe describes a 'household manual' belonging to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, which she characterizes as a 'powerfully incriminating document' and a 'little black book'. She highlights that multiple copies existed and points to a specific page from Government Exhibit 52-G, titled 'Massage Florida,' noting the suspiciously large number of female names as evidence of wrongdoing.
DOJ-OGR-00017067.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe, arguing that Maxwell was integral to Epstein's operation. The argument uses evidence like FedEx records from 2002 showing Maxwell sending packages from Epstein's office, and corroborates the testimony of a witness, Carolyn, who received packages from Epstein at age 15, using phone messages she left at Epstein's Palm Beach house in 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00017065.jpg
This document is a summation by Ms. Moe in a legal case against Maxwell. It recounts the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, who stated that in 2001 at age 14, Maxwell recruited her for 'sexualized massages' at Jeffrey Epstein's house. The summation highlights corroborating testimony from Carolyn's then-boyfriend, Sean, and details conversations between Maxwell and Carolyn about her personal life, which were seemingly aimed at grooming her for travel and further exploitation.
DOJ-OGR-00017063.jpg
This document contains a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details testimony from a witness named Carolyn regarding interactions with Virginia, Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, describing sexual acts that occurred in a massage room. The speaker also describes the physical layout of the room, including nude drawings and furniture, characterizing it as a site of sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017058.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor. She argues that the defendant, Maxwell, engaged in 'classic grooming behavior' by teaching young girls, including Annie and Kate, to give foot massages to Epstein. This act is presented as a deliberate method to break down boundaries and facilitate abuse, not as an innocent mentoring activity.
DOJ-OGR-00017055.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues for Maxwell's guilt by recounting the testimonies of two victims, 'Jane' and 'Annie Farmer'. The summary details how Jane's testimony of sexual exploitation by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein was corroborated, and describes Epstein's initial grooming of a 16-year-old Annie Farmer in 1995, presenting these as part of a consistent 'playbook' of abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017054.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a summation given by Ms. Moe on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues to the jury that the defense's attempt to discredit a witness named Jane by calling other women named Michelle and Ava to testify is a meaningless distraction. She emphasizes that Jane never identified the specific individuals Michelle Healey or Eva Dubin, and points out that Epstein and Maxwell's contact book contained multiple people with those common first names.
DOJ-OGR-00017050.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor. She argues that testimony from a witness named Matt corroborates the account of a victim named Jane. Matt, who dated Jane in the mid-2000s, testified that Jane told him years ago about being abused by her "godfather," Jeffrey Epstein, and another woman, whom Jane later confirmed was Maxwell after her arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00017045.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation, likely from a prosecutor named Ms. Moe, detailing the sexual abuse of a 14-year-old victim named Jane by Maxwell and Epstein. The summary recounts Jane's testimony about various forms of abuse, including forced touching and group encounters, and highlights trips the trio took from Florida to Epstein's house in New York via commercial and private flights. The speaker argues to the jury that these actions were predatory and not normal.
DOJ-OGR-00017044.jpg
This document is a page from a legal summation, likely by a prosecutor named Ms. Moe, recounting the testimony of a victim named Jane. The text details how Ghislaine Maxwell groomed Jane by teaching her how to massage Jeffrey Epstein, which then escalated into sexual abuse perpetrated by both Maxwell and Epstein. The testimony highlights Maxwell's role in normalizing the abuse by acting casually while it was happening, causing the victim immense confusion and fear.
DOJ-OGR-00017037.jpg
This document is a page from a court summation, likely delivered by 'Ms. Moe', in a criminal case. The speaker outlines the stages of 'grooming' as explained by a Dr. Rocchio and alleges that the defendants, Maxwell and Epstein, used this exact 'playbook' to carefully select and target vulnerable girls from struggling, single-mother households, specifically naming Jane, Kate, Annie, and Carolyn.
DOJ-OGR-00017036.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a prosecutor's summation in a trial against 'Maxwell'. The prosecutor argues that a warning in a household manual for staff to be 'blind, deaf, and dumb' was intended to cover up the 'horrifying crimes' she and Epstein were committing. The prosecutor also introduces the argument that Maxwell used a consistent 'playbook' to exploit multiple young girls, citing victims by name and referencing the testimony of an expert psychologist.
DOJ-OGR-00016983.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court hearing on August 10, 2022, pertaining to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The discussion centers on amending a legal document, specifically a clause alleging that Maxwell, among Epstein's employees, sent gifts to Carolyn between 2001 and 2004. Mr. Everdell argues for the exclusion of Maxwell's name from this clause, citing a lack of evidence and contradictory FedEx records, to which the government, represented by Mr. Rohrbach, ultimately agrees.
DOJ-OGR-00016803.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Young, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness confirms their involvement in two interviews from December 2019 and February 2020 and is asked to read excerpts from a report. The quoted sections describe an incident where an individual named Maxwell removed the clothes of a 14-year-old girl referred to as 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00016802.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Young by Ms. Menninger. The questioning centers on a report from a November 2019 interview with a person named 'Jane', which was authored by the witness's partner, Detective Byrne. The testimony confirms that Jane was present at Epstein's house and was unsure if Maxwell had ever called her to make appointments.
DOJ-OGR-00016443.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Swain is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz. Swain testifies that a person named Annie took a weekend trip to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, that Epstein paid for the trip, and that Swain personally drove Annie to the airport. The witness denies ever having spoken to or met a person named Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Redirect examination of Annie Farmer) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness regarding a statement made to the FBI in 2006 concerning a massage given to her by Maxwell. The witness describes Maxwell asking her to undress and lay on a table under sheets, and then rubbing her body and pulling back the sheet, before the defense attorney objects.
DOJ-OGR-00013189.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between her current testimony and a statement she gave to the FBI in 2007 regarding her visits to Epstein's residence. Specifically, she is questioned about whether it was Sarah or Maxwell who greeted her on her second visit and Sarah's role in scheduling massages.
DOJ-OGR-00013149.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn confirms she received wired money from a fund and, as a condition, signed a waiver agreeing not to sue any of Jeffrey Epstein's employees, which she understands includes a person named Maxwell. The transcript concludes with one attorney, Ms. Comey, finishing her questions and another, Mr. Pagliuca, beginning his cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013147.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Carolyn confirms her prior testimony from December 2009, stating she called Mr. Epstein's residence to arrange a paid massage. She recalls speaking with individuals named Sarah and Maxwell, or other household staff, who took messages for Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013146.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The testimony reviews Carolyn's prior statements from December 2009 regarding her visits to Jeffrey Epstein's home. Specifically, Carolyn confirms that Epstein did not contact her personally; rather, he would have 'Sarah or Maxwell' call her to arrange the visits.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Reconsideration of the District Court's response
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Travel and an invitation to an island
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
Scheduling massage appointments
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Carolyn's career aspirations
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Epstein's sexual preferences and needs
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Denial of motion
Denied Maxwell's motion for a new trial.
Motion for new trial
Moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity