MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Flight | Virginia Roberts was on flight records with Maxwell when she was 17 years old. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Lawsuit | A lawsuit between Giuffre and Maxwell, cited as Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal discovery | A bitter, hard-fought, and wide-ranging discovery process spanning over a year, which included do... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A district court entered a stipulated Protective Order to handle the confidential nature of the d... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal negotiation | Boies Schiller proposed adding a 'law enforcement' exception to the Protective Order, which Maxwe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal settlement | The case between Giuffre and Maxwell settled before trial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and sexual exploitation | Epstein and MAXWELL recruited Minor Victim-4 to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach... | Palm Beach Residence | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | Epstein and MAXWELL both encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-4 to recruit other girls to engage i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | A flight to New Mexico and a return flight involving a person named Jane, central to a question f... | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Maxwell and Epstein sexually abused Jane during so-called massages. | in a room | View |
| N/A | Trial | The underlying legal trial where Juror 50 served. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Appeal | Maxwell is appealing a decision, challenging Judge Nathan's finding that Juror 50 was credible an... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York charged Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell moved to dismiss the charges against her, which the District Court denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A summation is being given in a criminal trial where the defense has attacked the credibility of ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Civil suit of Giuffre v. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal verdict | A jury reached a conviction verdict in the trial of Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Scheduling | Maxwell continued to call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein after bei... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell moved to dismiss the indictment based on the clear language of the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Maxwell's motion to dismiss was denied without a hearing or discovery. | District Court | View |
| N/A | Crime | Maxwell and Epstein acted as partners in crime and predators, molesting kids together. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | MAXWELL and Epstein invited Minor Victim-4, who was under 18, to travel from Florida to a place o... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury note. | Court | View |
| N/A | Flight | Transportation of Jane, including a flight to New Mexico and a return flight. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding / conviction | The conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell, which juror Scotty discusses. | N/A | View |
EFTA00038108.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email chain from October 1, 2020, coordinating assistance for Squad C-20 regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. Agents are seeking volunteers to transport a laptop and hard drive containing digital discovery evidence to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for review by Maxwell and her defense team. One agent responds confirming their availability.
EFTA00038018.pdf
An email from an FBI Special Agent in the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit requesting approval for international travel in September 2020. The agent, a colleague, and two AUSAs from SDNY intend to interview an 'important witness' in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation who is currently abroad and uncomfortable providing a full statement via video. The trip was originally scheduled for March 2020 but was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
EFTA00038011.pdf
An email dated July 2, 2020, from a likely New York-based law enforcement official to an FBI agent (possibly Boston division). The sender informs the recipient that Ghislaine Maxwell has consented to remand during her initial appearance and is pending transfer to New York. The email expresses gratitude for the coordination and assistance provided by the recipient's team during the operation over the preceding days.
EFTA00038005.pdf
An email chain from July 2, 2020, discussing the circulation of an interview conducted with an individual who provided security for Maxwell (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) on unspecified premises. The document is heavily redacted regarding the identities of the senders and recipients.
EFTA00038003.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) dated July 6, 2020, discussing the logistics of property transported with Ghislaine Maxwell. While her personal effects (clothes, jewelry, phone) were released to her defense counsel, the US Marshals requested that specific security footage from the local jail where she was held be picked up from 500 Pearl Street and stored in files, as the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) refused to keep it.
EFTA00038002.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 2020 discussing the interview of a security guard who worked for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence highlights a detail from the interview notes regarding the guard running errands in a specific black car, prompting a query about who the vehicle is registered to.
EFTA00038001.pdf
An email chain from July 2020 between law enforcement officials (likely FBI given the reference to a '302' form) discussing the interview of a security guard for Ghislaine Maxwell. The agents discuss vehicle registrations, specifically an F-150 and a black car used to run errands. The document dates to the time of Maxwell's arrest in New Hampshire.
EFTA00037930.pdf
An email dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email contains an attachment titled 'Revised_Application_for_Maxwell_GPS_Combo_v1.docx' and the subject 'Revised GPS SW' (Search Warrant). This document appears to be related to the preparation of a GPS tracking warrant application for Ghislaine Maxwell shortly before her arrest.
EFTA00037929.pdf
This document is an email header dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. It concerns a 'new draft' with an attachment titled 'Revised_Application_for_Maxwell_GPS_Combo_v2.docx', indicating legal preparations involving GPS surveillance or data regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly before her arrest.
EFTA00037707.pdf
An internal FBI email dated June 17, 2020, from a Forensic Accountant in the New York Field Office. The email confirms the upload of three JP Morgan Chase document productions regarding 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) and two other redacted individuals to a DOJ file sharing site.
EFTA00037682.pdf
This document is an email header dated July 10, 2020, with the subject 'Defense memo'. The sender and recipient identities are redacted. The email contains a single attachment titled '2020-07-10,_Maxwell,_defense_memorandum.pdf', suggesting the correspondence relates to legal defense matters concerning Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00037366.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email chain dated July 7, 2019 (the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest), discussing the status of locating and contacting '10 CO conspirators.' The email confirms attempts to contact Jean-Luc Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell (who was located in Boston), as well as potential contact with Les Wexner in Ohio. It details a multi-state coordination involving New York, Florida, Boston, and Ohio.
EFTA00037001.pdf
An email chain from December 17, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely NYPD personnel. The AUSA requests that Theresa Acosta, the court reporter for Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition, be brought to the courthouse during lunch because the prosecution fears the defense might not stipulate (agree) to the deposition as previously promised. The respondent confirms they left a voicemail for Acosta.
EFTA00032602.pdf
An email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of the Government's reply brief regarding Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in the case US v. Maxwell, noting it is submitted temporarily under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00031707.pdf
This document is an email metadata printout dated December 28, 2020. It details an email notification regarding a court order in the legal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but it was blind copied (Bcc) to an internal journaling address 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
EFTA00031694.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, among attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing a forwarded invitation from Marshall L. Miller (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) for a 'White Collar Crime Committee' meeting. The internal USANYS discussion links the committee's topic—Rule 17 subpoenas—to the Ghislaine Maxwell case, noting a recent 'strong opinion' from Judge Alison J. Nathan (AJN) regarding a motion to quash a Rule 17 subpoena in the Maxwell trial. The attached memo details the committee's agenda, including a talk by former FinCEN Director Ken Blanco and proposed revisions to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17.
EFTA00031573.pdf
An email chain from April 9, 2020, discussing the drafting and review of two memos, one specifically identified as the 'Maxwell memo.' The participants discuss complications regarding a 'perjury section' in the Maxwell memo, stating the issue is not straightforward. An attachment titled 'Geoff_Notes_Potential_Perjury_by_Maxwell.docx' is circulated.
EFTA00031424.pdf
An internal email dated April 12, 2021, from a Victim Witness Assistant at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to colleagues. The email provides two Excel spreadsheets ('Epstein.xlsx' and 'maxwell.xlsx') containing lists of victims recorded in the Victim Notification System (VNS).
EFTA00031115.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 24, 2021, between unidentified legal professionals (likely DOJ prosecutors) regarding legal strategy. They are discussing a request for briefing materials to counter defense counsel's attempt to call numerous agents to testify in an effort to 'impeach the investigation.' One participant notes they are dealing with this same issue in the 'Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell) and shares a ruling from Judge Nathan (AJN) and relevant motions in limine (MIL).
EFTA00030924.pdf
This document contains the metadata and header information for an email sent on February 2, 2021, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell To-dos'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but the Bcc field includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The document appears to be related to the legal proceedings or media coverage regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00030875.pdf
This document contains the metadata headers for an email sent on January 11, 2021. The subject line is 'RE: Maxwell drive delivery Monday 1/11', likely referring to evidence or data related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is included in the blind carbon copy (Bcc) field.
EFTA00030664.pdf
This document is an email thread from June 2020 discussing a NY Post article about an Epstein butler claiming Prince Andrew 'maybe has something to hide.' The responder critiques British tabloids for paying sources, asking leading questions about Andrew and Maxwell, and twisting innocent statements into sensational headlines. The participants in the email chain are redacted.
EFTA00030591.pdf
This document is a record of an email sent on October 9, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Epstein/Maxwell Upload'. The sender and recipients are redacted. It appears to be an internal communication regarding the handling or uploading of data related to Epstein and Maxwell, likely during a discovery or investigation phase given the 2020 date. The email includes a technical Message-ID from an Outlook server.
EFTA00030551.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 21, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject matter concerns an e-discovery 'Relativity batch request & recap' regarding the Maxwell/Epstein case. The document serves as an administrative record of internal communications regarding evidence processing.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Ms. Maxwell's sleeping conditions
Maxwell submitted a letter to Judge Nathan asking the District Court to address her sleeping conditions by directing the MDC to cease 15-minute light surveillance or justify its necessity.
Bail Application
On February 23, 2021, Maxwell filed a bail application proposing two additional bail conditions.
Appeal of Judge Nathan's Order
Maxwell filed a notice of appeal from the Order denying her motion.
In support of her motion
Maxwell filed a reply to support her motion.
Phone Message
PLEASE CALL WHEN POSSIBLE
Availability Information
A message was taken for Mr Epstein at 7:50 AM from Maxwell, stating that a redacted person is available on Tuesday and 'NO ONE FOR TOMORROW'.
Personal life and travel
Carolyn and Maxwell had conversations at Epstein's house about sex toys, her future, her upbringing, her alcoholic mother, a person named Karen who was molested, and a travel invitation which Carolyn declined.
Finding the narrator's location
When the narrator asked Maxwell how she found her at Bloomingdales, Maxwell stated that she had asked the narrator's former colleagues at Henri Bendel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity