MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018700.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a witness named Carolyn is being questioned. She states that she provided multiple phone numbers (her own cell, her mom's cell, and Shawn's home phone) to a person named Maxwell so that he and Sarah could contact her for massage appointments. Carolyn explains she gave extra numbers to ensure she was reachable, remembers her mom's number, but claims to have 'blocked out' the others due to the passage of time.
DOJ-OGR-00018589.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures legal arguments regarding a piece of evidence in a conspiracy trial. The prosecution asserts that a topless photograph of a victim, along with flight logs showing she traveled with Maxwell and Epstein at age 17, proves she was a minor victim of the conspiracy. The defense, represented by Ms. Menninger, counters that photo metadata and testimony from Mr. Alessi establish the victim was not a minor at the relevant times, arguing the prosecution's claim is contrary to its own evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018583.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of a photograph as evidence. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects on the grounds of improper authentication, as there is no witness to testify about the photo's origin or integrity. In response, attorney Ms. Moe argues the photo is authenticated because it is part of a collection seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residence, and its relevance is tied to the relationship between Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018472.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Kate. Kate clarifies that a previous public hearing she participated in was about Jeffrey Epstein, not Maxwell. She states that during that hearing, she chose not to disclose the full details of her experiences with Epstein to protect her daughter from public exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00018406.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kate. The witness testifies that she does not plan to sue Maxwell, is not expecting more money from Epstein and Maxwell, and has no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial. After the questioning concludes, the court announces a morning break.
DOJ-OGR-00018402.jpg
This page is a transcript from the direct examination of a witness named Kate in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Kate testifies that she stopped spending time with Maxwell around age 24. She also details her past addiction to alcohol, cocaine, and sleeping pills, stating she achieved sobriety on May 1st, 2003, and affirms that her past substance use has not affected her memories.
DOJ-OGR-00018390.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate describes Ghislaine Maxwell's demeanor when discussing sexual topics as oddly youthful and "like a schoolgirl." She also testifies that Maxwell asked about her sex life and that she confided in Maxwell about her family difficulties, and states that her initial understanding was that Jeffrey Epstein was Maxwell's boyfriend.
DOJ-OGR-00018389.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Kate. Kate testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell told her about Jeffrey Epstein's sexual preferences, stating he liked 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he 'needed to have sex about three times a day'. This testimony suggests Maxwell's role in communicating Epstein's sexual demands and grooming potential victims.
DOJ-OGR-00018377.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate recounts how she first met Jeffrey Epstein at Ghislaine Maxwell's townhouse, a few weeks after having tea there. Maxwell urgently called Kate, insisting she come over to meet Epstein, who was described as being in his 40s and wearing sweatpants and a hoodie at the time of their meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00016810.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of Agent Young by attorney Ms. Comey. The questioning reveals that Agent Young interviewed an individual named 'Jane' about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and that Jane's disclosures were a gradual process over multiple meetings rather than a single event. The transcript also includes a sustained objection by another attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding the scope of the questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00016346.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to New Mexico, specifically whether Ghislaine Maxwell was involved in their transport, which the witness denies having knowledge of. Farmer confirms the trip was over a weekend and that they discussed this fact with their mother and subsequently informed the government of that conversation.
DOJ-OGR-00016289.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms that their prior civil lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein is concluded, having received a settlement from a fund in exchange for dismissing the case. Farmer also testifies that they have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00016287.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, A. Farmer. Farmer confirms being interviewed by law enforcement in New York in 2019 and by the government five or six times since then. The witness also affirms having sued individuals named Maxwell and Epstein, stating the motivation was to seek accountability.
DOJ-OGR-00016277.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. Farmer testifies about flying home to Phoenix, Arizona, and explains why she did not write about a preceding trip to New Mexico in her journal, stating she wanted to put the events out of her mind. She also explains how she came to keep a pair of boots that were purchased for her by Maxwell and Epstein during that trip.
DOJ-OGR-00016276.jpg
This document is a page of court testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. Farmer describes her last day at a ranch in New Mexico, recounting a conversation where she tried to discuss her academic work with Maxwell, who seemed completely disinterested. The witness confirms that she said goodbye to both Epstein and Maxwell before leaving the state.
DOJ-OGR-00016270.jpg
This document is a page from the court testimony of A. Farmer, dated August 10, 2022. Farmer recounts attending a movie, 'Primal Fear', in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell, describing their oddly 'playful' behavior. She testifies that throughout the movie, Epstein held and caressed her hand, foot, and arm, noting that his behavior was more 'blatant' and unconcealed than it had been in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00016267.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness, identified as A. Farmer, recounts a weekend spent at a ranch with only Epstein and Maxwell. Farmer describes her mixed feelings about the situation as a teenager, noting it was 'unusual' but also made her 'feel special'. She also details her initial impression of Maxwell as 'very outgoing' and seemingly excited to meet her, suggesting Maxwell was expecting her arrival.
DOJ-OGR-00016261.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a sidebar discussion between attorneys and the judge. The attorneys are debating how to question a witness about her reasons for returning to visit Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico, with the court ruling that testimony about what the witness's mother said is inadmissible hearsay. An attorney then proposes an alternative line of questioning focused on the witness's own feelings to circumvent the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00016239.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Annie Farmer by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Farmer identifies the defendant in the courtroom as a person named Maxwell, who she states gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. She also provides background information, stating she lived in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley, at that time.
DOJ-OGR-00016080.jpg
This document is a FedEx invoice dated December 23, 2002, detailing three separate shipments made in mid-December 2002. It lists the senders, recipients, tracking numbers, service types, and total transportation charges for each shipment. Notably, an individual named Larry Visoski is the recipient of two of the three packages from different senders.
DOJ-OGR-00016060.jpg
This FedEx invoice, dated December 16, 2002, details two shipments. The first, on December 11, 2002, was sent by Alan Dershowitz from an address associated with Jeffrey E. Epstein to a recipient named Edwina Simmonds. The second shipment, on December 4, 2002, was sent by B. Bonnett of the London Fog Company to Nick Simmons at Epshein Interest, an entity located at the same address as Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00015514.jpg
This document, marked as Government Exhibit 3-L-R, contains four handwritten phone message slips for 'Sarah K.' and 'Mr Epstein' dated July 9 and 10, 2004. The messages record callback requests and scheduling information from various individuals, including Maxwell, Miles, Leslie (from 'NY OFFICE'), and Cecilia. The messages were taken by an individual who signed with the initial 'R'.
DOJ-OGR-00015513.jpg
A page from a spiral-bound message book containing four phone message slips from July 2004. Messages are directed to Jeffrey Epstein ('Mr. Epstein'/'JE') and 'Sarah'. Callers include Schanz, Ivan Rosh, Leslie (from the NY Office reporting she is working from home), and Maxwell (referencing 'Darren').
DOJ-OGR-00015397.jpg
This FedEx invoice, dated December 2, 2002, details two shipments from November 2002. The first shipment was sent by Frances Goldman and Jeffrey E. Epstein from 457 Madison Ave, NY, to Ghislaine Maxwell in New York. The second shipment was sent by Kathee Elliott of Chariots of Palm Beach NC to Eric Gany at J Epstein & Co, also at 457 Madison Ave, NY.
DOJ-OGR-00015162.jpg
This document, a legal filing, discusses the strict legal standard for unsealing grand jury testimony, emphasizing that it should only be done in rare, 'exceptional circumstances' to preserve the integrity of grand jury secrecy. It argues against the Government's motion to unseal summary-witness testimony, contending that such an action would undermine the foundations of secrecy and that the redundancy of the testimony with evidence from Maxwell's trial does not justify its release.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Carolyn's career aspirations
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Epstein's sexual preferences and needs
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
Travel and an invitation to an island
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Scheduling massage appointments
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity