MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Abuser victim |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Accomplices |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror defendant |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The District Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Abuser victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-4
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Groomer victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-01-01 | Investigation | The USAO-SDNY did not open an investigation into Epstein or Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Maxwell's two depositions took place sometime before the summer of 2016. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Legal proceeding | The defendant testified under oath in a civil deposition related to a lawsuit brought by Virginia... | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | Maxwell's deposition where she agreed to testify, relying on the confidentiality protections of t... | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | Maxwell's July 2016 deposition is mentioned in a section heading. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | A deposition of Maxwell took place. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | Deposition of Maxwell as part of the factual background. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | Maxwell's deposition, grouped with the April 2016 deposition where she declined to invoke privilege. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | Maxwell declined to invoke her privilege against compulsory self-incrimination but agreed to test... | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | Maxwell appeared at a second deposition and answered questions. A superseding indictment alleges ... | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Investigation | An investigation into Maxwell was fomented, with evidence of collusion tracing back to early 2016. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Deposition | Deposition of Maxwell took place. | N/A | View |
| 2015-09-21 | N/A | Filing of Document 1 in Case 1:15-cv-07433 | Court (implied) | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal filing | Virginia Giuffre filed a civil defamation case, Giuffre v. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal filing | Giuffre, represented by Boies Schiller, filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Testimony | Carolyn testified under oath that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages. | Court | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Report to law enforcement | Carolyn mentioned meeting a woman with short black hair and an accent (implied to be Maxwell) to ... | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Financial transaction | Epstein paid Maxwell $7.4 million. | N/A | View |
| 2006-01-01 | Report to law enforcement | Annie reported to the FBI how Maxwell touched her breasts during a massage. | N/A | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Epstein and Maxwell kept Ransome's passport, threatened her, and forced her into sex with them an... | N/A | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Document creation | A household manual for the Palm Beach house, outlining demands from Epstein and Maxwell, was date... | Palm Beach | View |
| 2004-12-31 | Crime | End of a four-year time period in which alleged sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy oc... | N/A | View |
| 2004-07-09 | Phone call | Maxwell called for Mr Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2004-01-01 | N/A | Hesse stopped working for Maxwell and Epstein | N/A | View |
| 2004-01-01 | Personal relationship | Maxwell started dating Ted Waitt. | N/A | View |
EFTA00038108.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email chain from October 1, 2020, coordinating assistance for Squad C-20 regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. Agents are seeking volunteers to transport a laptop and hard drive containing digital discovery evidence to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for review by Maxwell and her defense team. One agent responds confirming their availability.
EFTA00038018.pdf
An email from an FBI Special Agent in the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit requesting approval for international travel in September 2020. The agent, a colleague, and two AUSAs from SDNY intend to interview an 'important witness' in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation who is currently abroad and uncomfortable providing a full statement via video. The trip was originally scheduled for March 2020 but was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
EFTA00038011.pdf
An email dated July 2, 2020, from a likely New York-based law enforcement official to an FBI agent (possibly Boston division). The sender informs the recipient that Ghislaine Maxwell has consented to remand during her initial appearance and is pending transfer to New York. The email expresses gratitude for the coordination and assistance provided by the recipient's team during the operation over the preceding days.
EFTA00038005.pdf
An email chain from July 2, 2020, discussing the circulation of an interview conducted with an individual who provided security for Maxwell (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) on unspecified premises. The document is heavily redacted regarding the identities of the senders and recipients.
EFTA00038003.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) dated July 6, 2020, discussing the logistics of property transported with Ghislaine Maxwell. While her personal effects (clothes, jewelry, phone) were released to her defense counsel, the US Marshals requested that specific security footage from the local jail where she was held be picked up from 500 Pearl Street and stored in files, as the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) refused to keep it.
EFTA00038002.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 2020 discussing the interview of a security guard who worked for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence highlights a detail from the interview notes regarding the guard running errands in a specific black car, prompting a query about who the vehicle is registered to.
EFTA00038001.pdf
An email chain from July 2020 between law enforcement officials (likely FBI given the reference to a '302' form) discussing the interview of a security guard for Ghislaine Maxwell. The agents discuss vehicle registrations, specifically an F-150 and a black car used to run errands. The document dates to the time of Maxwell's arrest in New Hampshire.
EFTA00037930.pdf
An email dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email contains an attachment titled 'Revised_Application_for_Maxwell_GPS_Combo_v1.docx' and the subject 'Revised GPS SW' (Search Warrant). This document appears to be related to the preparation of a GPS tracking warrant application for Ghislaine Maxwell shortly before her arrest.
EFTA00037929.pdf
This document is an email header dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. It concerns a 'new draft' with an attachment titled 'Revised_Application_for_Maxwell_GPS_Combo_v2.docx', indicating legal preparations involving GPS surveillance or data regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly before her arrest.
EFTA00037707.pdf
An internal FBI email dated June 17, 2020, from a Forensic Accountant in the New York Field Office. The email confirms the upload of three JP Morgan Chase document productions regarding 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) and two other redacted individuals to a DOJ file sharing site.
EFTA00037682.pdf
This document is an email header dated July 10, 2020, with the subject 'Defense memo'. The sender and recipient identities are redacted. The email contains a single attachment titled '2020-07-10,_Maxwell,_defense_memorandum.pdf', suggesting the correspondence relates to legal defense matters concerning Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00037366.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email chain dated July 7, 2019 (the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest), discussing the status of locating and contacting '10 CO conspirators.' The email confirms attempts to contact Jean-Luc Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell (who was located in Boston), as well as potential contact with Les Wexner in Ohio. It details a multi-state coordination involving New York, Florida, Boston, and Ohio.
EFTA00037001.pdf
An email chain from December 17, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely NYPD personnel. The AUSA requests that Theresa Acosta, the court reporter for Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition, be brought to the courthouse during lunch because the prosecution fears the defense might not stipulate (agree) to the deposition as previously promised. The respondent confirms they left a voicemail for Acosta.
EFTA00032602.pdf
An email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of the Government's reply brief regarding Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in the case US v. Maxwell, noting it is submitted temporarily under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00031707.pdf
This document is an email metadata printout dated December 28, 2020. It details an email notification regarding a court order in the legal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but it was blind copied (Bcc) to an internal journaling address 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
EFTA00031694.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, among attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing a forwarded invitation from Marshall L. Miller (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) for a 'White Collar Crime Committee' meeting. The internal USANYS discussion links the committee's topic—Rule 17 subpoenas—to the Ghislaine Maxwell case, noting a recent 'strong opinion' from Judge Alison J. Nathan (AJN) regarding a motion to quash a Rule 17 subpoena in the Maxwell trial. The attached memo details the committee's agenda, including a talk by former FinCEN Director Ken Blanco and proposed revisions to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17.
EFTA00031573.pdf
An email chain from April 9, 2020, discussing the drafting and review of two memos, one specifically identified as the 'Maxwell memo.' The participants discuss complications regarding a 'perjury section' in the Maxwell memo, stating the issue is not straightforward. An attachment titled 'Geoff_Notes_Potential_Perjury_by_Maxwell.docx' is circulated.
EFTA00031424.pdf
An internal email dated April 12, 2021, from a Victim Witness Assistant at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to colleagues. The email provides two Excel spreadsheets ('Epstein.xlsx' and 'maxwell.xlsx') containing lists of victims recorded in the Victim Notification System (VNS).
EFTA00031115.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 24, 2021, between unidentified legal professionals (likely DOJ prosecutors) regarding legal strategy. They are discussing a request for briefing materials to counter defense counsel's attempt to call numerous agents to testify in an effort to 'impeach the investigation.' One participant notes they are dealing with this same issue in the 'Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell) and shares a ruling from Judge Nathan (AJN) and relevant motions in limine (MIL).
EFTA00030924.pdf
This document contains the metadata and header information for an email sent on February 2, 2021, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell To-dos'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but the Bcc field includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The document appears to be related to the legal proceedings or media coverage regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00030875.pdf
This document contains the metadata headers for an email sent on January 11, 2021. The subject line is 'RE: Maxwell drive delivery Monday 1/11', likely referring to evidence or data related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is included in the blind carbon copy (Bcc) field.
EFTA00030664.pdf
This document is an email thread from June 2020 discussing a NY Post article about an Epstein butler claiming Prince Andrew 'maybe has something to hide.' The responder critiques British tabloids for paying sources, asking leading questions about Andrew and Maxwell, and twisting innocent statements into sensational headlines. The participants in the email chain are redacted.
EFTA00030591.pdf
This document is a record of an email sent on October 9, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Epstein/Maxwell Upload'. The sender and recipients are redacted. It appears to be an internal communication regarding the handling or uploading of data related to Epstein and Maxwell, likely during a discovery or investigation phase given the 2020 date. The email includes a technical Message-ID from an Outlook server.
EFTA00030551.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 21, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject matter concerns an e-discovery 'Relativity batch request & recap' regarding the Maxwell/Epstein case. The document serves as an administrative record of internal communications regarding evidence processing.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Setting up appointment times for so-called massages
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Mr. Epstein's status
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell Reply
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
Instruction to touch Epstein
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
General life updates and invitations
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Reconsideration of the District Court's response
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Travel and an invitation to an island
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
Scheduling massage appointments
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Carolyn's career aspirations
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Epstein's sexual preferences and needs
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity