MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
EFTA00026456.pdf
This document is an email header from November 18, 2020, forwarding a notification regarding activity in the criminal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Specifically, it relates to a 'Memo Endorsement'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
EFTA00026402.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 11, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell Financial Report Appendices'. The identities of the sender and recipients are fully redacted. The email appears to be part of legal discovery or internal correspondence regarding financial reports related to Ghislaine Maxwell, indicated by the Bates number EFTA00026402 at the bottom.
EFTA00025557.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 11, 2020, regarding 'Maxwell Financial Report Appendices'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The email includes an embedded message file with the same subject.
EFTA00025354.pdf
This document is an email dated April 29, 2020, sent between redacted parties. The subject line and attachment indicate the correspondence concerns a 'draft indictment' for Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell), dated April 28, 2020. The sender asks the recipient to review the document before discussing it.
EFTA00025210.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry from March 10, 2021, recording the acceptance of a meeting titled 'Epstein/Maxwell FOIA'. The attendee is an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), whose name is redacted. The meeting was scheduled for 30 minutes and classified as 'X-PERSONAL'.
EFTA00025034.pdf
An internal email dated October 25, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a '3500 cover letter' (referring to Jencks Act disclosures) and includes an attachment named '2021.10.25_Maxwell_Cover_Letter_v1.docx', indicating preparation for discovery production in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00024999.pdf
This document is an email metadata record dated January 11, 2021, regarding a 'Maxwell drive delivery'. The email was routed through a Bureau of Prisons (BOP.GOV) server, suggesting it concerns the delivery of digital materials (likely legal discovery) to Ghislaine Maxwell while in custody. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc to 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is visible.
EFTA00024926.pdf
This document is an email chain from April and May 2021 between staff and contractors at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the transcription of a specific, redacted recording. One participant explicitly mentions being preoccupied with work related to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), indicating this administrative task was part of the preparation for her prosecution. The final email confirms the transcription was completed, with one interviewer in the recording identified only as 'UM1'.
EFTA00023894.pdf
This document is an email dated August 17, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Andrew (likely Andrew Rohrbach) to redacted colleagues. It discusses a recent ruling by Judge Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motions. The email focuses on correcting the Judge's presumption that the prosecution intended to provide the defense with the identities of uncharged co-conspirators, stating clearly that they 'do not, in fact, intend to do so' and have drafted a letter to that effect.
EFTA00023821.pdf
This document is an email dated February 13, 2020, from Alaska Airlines' legal department to an FBI Special Agent in New York. The airline confirms they have 'no responsive records' regarding a Federal Grand Jury subpoena issued on January 23, 2020, related to 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell).
EFTA00023692.pdf
This document is an email metadata printout dated September 28, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The document contains technical email headers, including a Message-ID and an embedded message reference, with most participant identities redacted.
EFTA00023687.pdf
This document is an email header and metadata printout dated September 25, 2020. The subject line 'RE: Epstein/Maxwell Upload' suggests the transmission of digital files related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is visible as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
EFTA00023466.pdf
An email dated September 30, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell case.' The email discusses a draft 'RTC' (likely Requests to Charge/Jury Instructions) attached as 'Maxwell_RTC_v11.docx' and notes a filing deadline of October 27 for a joint proposal.
EFTA00023460.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 29, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It is addressed to counsel, including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, distributing an attached Order issued by the Judge and noting it will be filed publicly the following Monday.
EFTA00023344.pdf
This document is an email dated August 5, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney to a redacted recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2020.08.05_Maxwell_Discovery_Letter.docx', indicating it relates to legal discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The body text is brief, simply stating 'Here's the letter.'
EFTA00023254.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry dated October 16, 2020, scheduling a 30-minute tentative meeting titled 'Maxwell - Discuss Images from Epstein Devices'. The entry includes metadata such as creation and modification timestamps, but the attendee information and dial-in details are redacted. The document appears to be part of an investigative or legal file (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) referencing evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices.
EFTA00023250.pdf
This document is an email notification dated October 16, 2020, indicating the acceptance of a meeting invitation. The subject of the meeting is 'Maxwell - Discuss Images from Epstein Devices', sent by an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The names of the sender and recipient are redacted.
EFTA00023073.pdf
This document is an email sent on February 3, 2021, by an unnamed Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject deals with 'Maxwell motions' (part 2 of 3) and includes a zip file attachment related to a filing from January 25, 2021.
EFTA00023033.pdf
An email correspondence dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to an unknown recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2021.11.03_Maxwell_RTC_[unredacted].docx', likely pertaining to legal filings or proceedings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00023016.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted email chain from September 10, 2020, between unidentified government officials (likely DOJ/FBI). The discussion concerns a budget shortage ('out of money through the end of the fiscal') preventing the immediate hiring of a vendor to scan 'SDFL Epstein stuff' and process 'OPR Epstein stuff'. Despite the shortage, one participant confirms that an unidentified male superior 'will find the 10K for Maxwell' to ensure the work proceeds without waiting until October.
EFTA00022051.pdf
An email dated October 19, 2020, from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the '5th Production' of discovery materials. The email outlines the procedure for sending hard drives and password-protected cover letters to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) and defense counsel.
EFTA00022047.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 13-14, 2020, discussing technical discovery tasks for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence involves the transfer and database indexing of files, specifically 26,164 documents from the 'FBI Files from Florida Office' and boxes of files from the 'USAO-SDFL' (Southern District of Florida). The participants are coordinating the loading of these materials into a 'US v Epstein' Relativity database and physical delivery of drives to 1 St. Andrews (SDNY office).
EFTA00022038.pdf
This document contains an email chain from June 2021 involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) investigating a specific financial transaction from October 1999. The investigation focuses on a $18,300,000 transfer to 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell) from the Financial Trust Company's JP Morgan account (ending in 5001). The correspondence confirms the transfer was funded by the sale of a JP Morgan Institutional Prime Money Market Fund.
EFTA00021904.pdf
This document is an email dated August 14, 2020, with the subject 'Key docs'. It lists several attached files which appear to be internal prosecution memoranda and reports related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The attachments include a prosecution memo for Epstein (JE), a co-conspirator investigation update from Dec 2019, a prosecution memo for Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), a perjury supplement, a prosecution memo for a redacted individual, and original Palm Beach Police reports.
EFTA00020861.pdf
This document is an email chain from late September 2020 between members of a legal team regarding the 'Fourth Production' of discovery materials. Key topics include the technical handling of 'LSJ Scene2Go' (an application containing 3D maps of Little St. James, specifically the grotto and main structure), the processing of a JPMorgan document production, and the status of files related to 'Maxwell's MDC drive'. The team discusses strategies for Bates stamping viewable image files versus system files to ensure the defense can utilize the materials.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
General life updates and invitations
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Instruction to touch Epstein
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Appointments
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Scheduling an appointment to massage Epstein
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Interaction with Epstein
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Maxwell's personal life, relationships, and her boyfriend...
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Scheduling massages and scheme operations
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Scheduling massages with Jeffrey Epstein
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Mr. Epstein's status
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Setting up appointment times for so-called massages
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell Reply
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity