| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
This document is an internal FBI email chain from October 1, 2020, coordinating assistance for Squad C-20 regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation. Agents are seeking volunteers to transport a laptop and hard drive containing digital discovery evidence to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for review by Maxwell and her defense team. One agent responds confirming their availability.
An email from an FBI Special Agent in the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit requesting approval for international travel in September 2020. The agent, a colleague, and two AUSAs from SDNY intend to interview an 'important witness' in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation who is currently abroad and uncomfortable providing a full statement via video. The trip was originally scheduled for March 2020 but was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
An email dated July 2, 2020, from a likely New York-based law enforcement official to an FBI agent (possibly Boston division). The sender informs the recipient that Ghislaine Maxwell has consented to remand during her initial appearance and is pending transfer to New York. The email expresses gratitude for the coordination and assistance provided by the recipient's team during the operation over the preceding days.
An email chain from July 2, 2020, discussing the circulation of an interview conducted with an individual who provided security for Maxwell (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) on unspecified premises. The document is heavily redacted regarding the identities of the senders and recipients.
An email from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) dated July 6, 2020, discussing the logistics of property transported with Ghislaine Maxwell. While her personal effects (clothes, jewelry, phone) were released to her defense counsel, the US Marshals requested that specific security footage from the local jail where she was held be picked up from 500 Pearl Street and stored in files, as the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) refused to keep it.
This document contains an email chain from July 2020 discussing the interview of a security guard who worked for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence highlights a detail from the interview notes regarding the guard running errands in a specific black car, prompting a query about who the vehicle is registered to.
An email chain from July 2020 between law enforcement officials (likely FBI given the reference to a '302' form) discussing the interview of a security guard for Ghislaine Maxwell. The agents discuss vehicle registrations, specifically an F-150 and a black car used to run errands. The document dates to the time of Maxwell's arrest in New Hampshire.
An email dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email contains an attachment titled 'Revised_Application_for_Maxwell_GPS_Combo_v1.docx' and the subject 'Revised GPS SW' (Search Warrant). This document appears to be related to the preparation of a GPS tracking warrant application for Ghislaine Maxwell shortly before her arrest.
This document is an email header dated June 30, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. It concerns a 'new draft' with an attachment titled 'Revised_Application_for_Maxwell_GPS_Combo_v2.docx', indicating legal preparations involving GPS surveillance or data regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly before her arrest.
An internal FBI email dated June 17, 2020, from a Forensic Accountant in the New York Field Office. The email confirms the upload of three JP Morgan Chase document productions regarding 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) and two other redacted individuals to a DOJ file sharing site.
This document is an email header dated July 10, 2020, with the subject 'Defense memo'. The sender and recipient identities are redacted. The email contains a single attachment titled '2020-07-10,_Maxwell,_defense_memorandum.pdf', suggesting the correspondence relates to legal defense matters concerning Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an internal FBI email chain dated July 7, 2019 (the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest), discussing the status of locating and contacting '10 CO conspirators.' The email confirms attempts to contact Jean-Luc Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell (who was located in Boston), as well as potential contact with Les Wexner in Ohio. It details a multi-state coordination involving New York, Florida, Boston, and Ohio.
An email chain from December 17, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely NYPD personnel. The AUSA requests that Theresa Acosta, the court reporter for Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition, be brought to the courthouse during lunch because the prosecution fears the defense might not stipulate (agree) to the deposition as previously promised. The respondent confirms they left a voicemail for Acosta.
An email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of the Government's reply brief regarding Exhibit 52 (GX 52) in the case US v. Maxwell, noting it is submitted temporarily under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
This document is an email metadata printout dated December 28, 2020. It details an email notification regarding a court order in the legal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but it was blind copied (Bcc) to an internal journaling address 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
This document is an email chain from May 3, 2021, among attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing a forwarded invitation from Marshall L. Miller (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) for a 'White Collar Crime Committee' meeting. The internal USANYS discussion links the committee's topic—Rule 17 subpoenas—to the Ghislaine Maxwell case, noting a recent 'strong opinion' from Judge Alison J. Nathan (AJN) regarding a motion to quash a Rule 17 subpoena in the Maxwell trial. The attached memo details the committee's agenda, including a talk by former FinCEN Director Ken Blanco and proposed revisions to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17.
An email chain from April 9, 2020, discussing the drafting and review of two memos, one specifically identified as the 'Maxwell memo.' The participants discuss complications regarding a 'perjury section' in the Maxwell memo, stating the issue is not straightforward. An attachment titled 'Geoff_Notes_Potential_Perjury_by_Maxwell.docx' is circulated.
An internal email dated April 12, 2021, from a Victim Witness Assistant at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to colleagues. The email provides two Excel spreadsheets ('Epstein.xlsx' and 'maxwell.xlsx') containing lists of victims recorded in the Victim Notification System (VNS).
This document is an email chain from November 24, 2021, between unidentified legal professionals (likely DOJ prosecutors) regarding legal strategy. They are discussing a request for briefing materials to counter defense counsel's attempt to call numerous agents to testify in an effort to 'impeach the investigation.' One participant notes they are dealing with this same issue in the 'Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell) and shares a ruling from Judge Nathan (AJN) and relevant motions in limine (MIL).
This document contains the metadata and header information for an email sent on February 2, 2021, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell To-dos'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but the Bcc field includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The document appears to be related to the legal proceedings or media coverage regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document contains the metadata headers for an email sent on January 11, 2021. The subject line is 'RE: Maxwell drive delivery Monday 1/11', likely referring to evidence or data related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is included in the blind carbon copy (Bcc) field.
This document is an email thread from June 2020 discussing a NY Post article about an Epstein butler claiming Prince Andrew 'maybe has something to hide.' The responder critiques British tabloids for paying sources, asking leading questions about Andrew and Maxwell, and twisting innocent statements into sensational headlines. The participants in the email chain are redacted.
This document is a record of an email sent on October 9, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Epstein/Maxwell Upload'. The sender and recipients are redacted. It appears to be an internal communication regarding the handling or uploading of data related to Epstein and Maxwell, likely during a discovery or investigation phase given the 2020 date. The email includes a technical Message-ID from an Outlook server.
This document is an email header dated October 21, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject matter concerns an e-discovery 'Relativity batch request & recap' regarding the Maxwell/Epstein case. The document serves as an administrative record of internal communications regarding evidence processing.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity