MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Prior ruling cited (Maxwell, 2021 WL 3591801) | Court Record | View |
| 2020-12-28 | Legal ruling | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's bail application in a written order. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-28 | N/A | Opinion & Order in case 20cr330 (referenced in attachment filename) | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-28 | N/A | Activity/Order in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell | Court (implied) | View |
| 2020-12-21 | Legal filing deadline | Deadline for Maxwell's pretrial motions to be filed. | United States District Court | View |
| 2020-12-20 | Legal decision | A decision was made in the case of US v Maxwell, as noted in the watermark. | Court | View |
| 2020-12-20 | Legal decision | The case 'US v Maxwell' was decided, as noted in the document's watermark. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-18 | N/A | Trial of Ghislaine Maxwell | Court | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Legal proceeding | Maxwell renewed her request for bail, presenting a revised bail package. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Legal proceeding | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's renewed application for bail. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-25 | Legal ruling | A ruling in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221599, at *16 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, ... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-11-18 | N/A | Memo Endorsement in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell | Court (implied) | View |
| 2020-11-09 | Court ruling | The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxw... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-10-26 | N/A | Call with GA USAO re Maxwell | Unknown (Remote/Phone) | View |
| 2020-10-23 | N/A | Discovery Review | MDC | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The court dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxwell and denied the motion to consolidat... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Preparation of 5th Production discovery materials for distribution to defense counsel and Ghislai... | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court denial of Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus. | Court of Appeals | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court denial of Maxwell's motion to consolidate her criminal appeal with the civil appeal Guiffre... | Court of Appeals | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court dismissal of Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. | Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court dismissal of Maxwell's appeal regarding a protective order modification. | Court of Appeals | View |
| 2020-10-02 | N/A | Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order | District Court | View |
| 2020-10-02 | N/A | Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061 | Court | View |
| 2020-10-02 | N/A | Rule 16 Discovery | Court | View |
EFTA00026456.pdf
This document is an email header from November 18, 2020, forwarding a notification regarding activity in the criminal case 'USA v. Maxwell' (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Specifically, it relates to a 'Memo Endorsement'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
EFTA00026402.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 11, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Maxwell Financial Report Appendices'. The identities of the sender and recipients are fully redacted. The email appears to be part of legal discovery or internal correspondence regarding financial reports related to Ghislaine Maxwell, indicated by the Bates number EFTA00026402 at the bottom.
EFTA00025557.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 11, 2020, regarding 'Maxwell Financial Report Appendices'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc includes 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The email includes an embedded message file with the same subject.
EFTA00025354.pdf
This document is an email dated April 29, 2020, sent between redacted parties. The subject line and attachment indicate the correspondence concerns a 'draft indictment' for Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell), dated April 28, 2020. The sender asks the recipient to review the document before discussing it.
EFTA00025210.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry from March 10, 2021, recording the acceptance of a meeting titled 'Epstein/Maxwell FOIA'. The attendee is an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), whose name is redacted. The meeting was scheduled for 30 minutes and classified as 'X-PERSONAL'.
EFTA00025034.pdf
An internal email dated October 25, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email concerns a '3500 cover letter' (referring to Jencks Act disclosures) and includes an attachment named '2021.10.25_Maxwell_Cover_Letter_v1.docx', indicating preparation for discovery production in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00024999.pdf
This document is an email metadata record dated January 11, 2021, regarding a 'Maxwell drive delivery'. The email was routed through a Bureau of Prisons (BOP.GOV) server, suggesting it concerns the delivery of digital materials (likely legal discovery) to Ghislaine Maxwell while in custody. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc to 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is visible.
EFTA00024926.pdf
This document is an email chain from April and May 2021 between staff and contractors at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the transcription of a specific, redacted recording. One participant explicitly mentions being preoccupied with work related to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), indicating this administrative task was part of the preparation for her prosecution. The final email confirms the transcription was completed, with one interviewer in the recording identified only as 'UM1'.
EFTA00023894.pdf
This document is an email dated August 17, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Andrew (likely Andrew Rohrbach) to redacted colleagues. It discusses a recent ruling by Judge Nathan denying Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motions. The email focuses on correcting the Judge's presumption that the prosecution intended to provide the defense with the identities of uncharged co-conspirators, stating clearly that they 'do not, in fact, intend to do so' and have drafted a letter to that effect.
EFTA00023821.pdf
This document is an email dated February 13, 2020, from Alaska Airlines' legal department to an FBI Special Agent in New York. The airline confirms they have 'no responsive records' regarding a Federal Grand Jury subpoena issued on January 23, 2020, related to 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell).
EFTA00023692.pdf
This document is an email metadata printout dated September 28, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns a draft letter to Judge Nathan regarding discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The document contains technical email headers, including a Message-ID and an embedded message reference, with most participant identities redacted.
EFTA00023687.pdf
This document is an email header and metadata printout dated September 25, 2020. The subject line 'RE: Epstein/Maxwell Upload' suggests the transmission of digital files related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is visible as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'.
EFTA00023466.pdf
An email dated September 30, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell case.' The email discusses a draft 'RTC' (likely Requests to Charge/Jury Instructions) attached as 'Maxwell_RTC_v11.docx' and notes a filing deadline of October 27 for a joint proposal.
EFTA00023460.pdf
This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 29, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It is addressed to counsel, including Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca, distributing an attached Order issued by the Judge and noting it will be filed publicly the following Monday.
EFTA00023344.pdf
This document is an email dated August 5, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney to a redacted recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2020.08.05_Maxwell_Discovery_Letter.docx', indicating it relates to legal discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The body text is brief, simply stating 'Here's the letter.'
EFTA00023254.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry dated October 16, 2020, scheduling a 30-minute tentative meeting titled 'Maxwell - Discuss Images from Epstein Devices'. The entry includes metadata such as creation and modification timestamps, but the attendee information and dial-in details are redacted. The document appears to be part of an investigative or legal file (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) referencing evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices.
EFTA00023250.pdf
This document is an email notification dated October 16, 2020, indicating the acceptance of a meeting invitation. The subject of the meeting is 'Maxwell - Discuss Images from Epstein Devices', sent by an individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The names of the sender and recipient are redacted.
EFTA00023073.pdf
This document is an email sent on February 3, 2021, by an unnamed Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject deals with 'Maxwell motions' (part 2 of 3) and includes a zip file attachment related to a filing from January 25, 2021.
EFTA00023033.pdf
An email correspondence dated November 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to an unknown recipient. The email contains an attachment titled '2021.11.03_Maxwell_RTC_[unredacted].docx', likely pertaining to legal filings or proceedings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00023016.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted email chain from September 10, 2020, between unidentified government officials (likely DOJ/FBI). The discussion concerns a budget shortage ('out of money through the end of the fiscal') preventing the immediate hiring of a vendor to scan 'SDFL Epstein stuff' and process 'OPR Epstein stuff'. Despite the shortage, one participant confirms that an unidentified male superior 'will find the 10K for Maxwell' to ensure the work proceeds without waiting until October.
EFTA00022051.pdf
An email dated October 19, 2020, from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the '5th Production' of discovery materials. The email outlines the procedure for sending hard drives and password-protected cover letters to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) and defense counsel.
EFTA00022047.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 13-14, 2020, discussing technical discovery tasks for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence involves the transfer and database indexing of files, specifically 26,164 documents from the 'FBI Files from Florida Office' and boxes of files from the 'USAO-SDFL' (Southern District of Florida). The participants are coordinating the loading of these materials into a 'US v Epstein' Relativity database and physical delivery of drives to 1 St. Andrews (SDNY office).
EFTA00022038.pdf
This document contains an email chain from June 2021 involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) investigating a specific financial transaction from October 1999. The investigation focuses on a $18,300,000 transfer to 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell) from the Financial Trust Company's JP Morgan account (ending in 5001). The correspondence confirms the transfer was funded by the sale of a JP Morgan Institutional Prime Money Market Fund.
EFTA00021904.pdf
This document is an email dated August 14, 2020, with the subject 'Key docs'. It lists several attached files which appear to be internal prosecution memoranda and reports related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The attachments include a prosecution memo for Epstein (JE), a co-conspirator investigation update from Dec 2019, a prosecution memo for Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), a perjury supplement, a prosecution memo for a redacted individual, and original Palm Beach Police reports.
EFTA00020861.pdf
This document is an email chain from late September 2020 between members of a legal team regarding the 'Fourth Production' of discovery materials. Key topics include the technical handling of 'LSJ Scene2Go' (an application containing 3D maps of Little St. James, specifically the grotto and main structure), the processing of a JPMorgan document production, and the status of files related to 'Maxwell's MDC drive'. The team discusses strategies for Bates stamping viewable image files versus system files to ensure the defense can utilize the materials.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Mr. Epstein's status
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Scheduling massages with Jeffrey Epstein
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Scheduling massages and scheme operations
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Interaction with Epstein
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Appointments
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Scheduling an appointment to massage Epstein
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Maxwell's personal life, relationships, and her boyfriend...
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity