MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
14
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
11
Very Strong
|
56 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
organization
district court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirator |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion denied by District Court without an evidentiary hearing. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell argues Counts Three and Four of the Indictment are untimely. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court declines Maxwell's motion to strike surplusage at this juncture. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moves to strike surplusage from the S1 superseding indictment, specifically allegations r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion for a new trial denied by District Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage incident | New Mexico Ranch | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury instruction on Count Four, requiring finding that Maxwell transported Jane for sexual activity. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of the District Court's response. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appealed the District Court's denial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court found that nothing in the NPA or its negotiation history suggested it precluded USAO-SDNY f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cancellation of Maria's trip to New Mexico | New Mexico (intended destin... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Denial of motion to compel immediate disclosure of Minor Victim-4's prior statements. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rule 33 Motion Ruling | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of lawsuit against Maxwell | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Offenses committed by Maxwell that were subject to motions to dismiss. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Denial of temporary release | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flashlight checks performed on Maxwell every 15 minutes due to enhanced security schedule. | MDC | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's appeal/contention regarding the application of the NPA to her prosecution in SDNY. | Second Circuit Court of App... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Judge Nathan declined to modify protective order | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defamation Action | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage incident where Maxwell instructed Farmer to undress, performed a massage, exposed Farmer'... | The room where Farmer was s... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Travel with Epstein and Maxwell | Various (Travel) | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denied Maxwell's motion for reconsideration. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | MAXWELL arranged for Minor Victim-1 to be transported multiple times from Florida to New York for... | Florida to New York | View |
EFTA00020540.pdf
This document is an internal email thread between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated October 17, 2018. The correspondence circulates a legal opinion by Judge Sweet regarding the 'Right of Public Access Judicial Document' in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, which the sender noted reading about in the New York Law Journal (NYLJ).
EFTA00020493.pdf
An FBI Intake report dated August 20, 2020, detailing a call from a male source in Essex, NY, who claims to have worked with Leslie Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein and was pardoned by a U.S. President. The caller reported contacting a female victim in Manhattan who is writing a book and is in touch with hundreds of other victims. The caller alleged the existence of films recording prominent men, specifically naming Epstein, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump, as well as Maxwell, and inquired about who hired Epstein at 'Bear' (likely Bear Stearns).
EFTA00020392.pdf
This document is an email dated July 10, 2020, sent to an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email attaches a scheduling order for Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming detention/bail hearing and discusses logistics, specifically noting that the order contains dial-in information for public audio access which can be provided to victims if requested.
EFTA00020102.pdf
This document is an internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated October 11, 2021. The email transmits draft letters addressed to the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), as indicated by the attachment filenames. The email includes the sender's signature block with the SDNY office address.
EFTA00019928.pdf
This document is an email dated December 2, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell' case. The email discusses an attached order from Judge Nathan which requires the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal team to file a letter with the court by the following Friday. The sender requests a call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00019914.pdf
This document is an email dated June 19, 2021, between personnel at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the management of legal files. The sender requests a contractor to save attached PDF 'prep notes' related to testifying witnesses into specific '3500 folders' (referring to Jencks Act material) on the 'Epstein share drive' in preparation for the Maxwell trial.
EFTA00019193.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 10, 2021, transmitting a document titled 'Maxwell Jury Questionnaire'. The attachment appears to be a legal draft coordinating jury selection questions between the Defense and the Government (prosecution), likely for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00019043.pdf
This document is an email dated October 8, 2021, concerning the preparation of jury questionnaires and voir dire questions, likely for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial as indicated by the attachment filename. The sender discusses difficulties in combining drafts from opposing legal teams and schedules a conferral for that afternoon to discuss the documents further.
EFTA00018707.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted email from February 22, 2021, exchanged between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line 'Opposition to Maxwell GJ Motion' indicates the correspondence concerns legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically regarding a Grand Jury motion. The email includes an embedded message file with the same subject.
EFTA00018658.pdf
An email chain from December 30, 2020, in which a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris forwards a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) request from French authorities. The request relates to the investigation of an individual (name redacted) who was recently arrested in Paris. The sender notes they are already in contact with the recipients regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings.
EFTA00018005.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated September 22, 2021. The email discusses the review of evidence files including FBI files and FedEx records, mentions the discovery of 'Maxwell phone records,' and attaches a 'Household Manual' dated 2005 in preparation for an upcoming interview with the manual's source.
EFTA00016829.pdf
An email dated January 24, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to recipients labeled as 'TROOPERS'. The email requests the service of a subpoena to Expedia regarding travel records for 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell).
EFTA00016792.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) dated December 18, 2020, notifying the recipient (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel) that a CD containing a 'small corrected production of discovery' regarding Maxwell has been sent via FedEx.
EFTA00016392.pdf
An email dated June 29, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding a 'Corrected Maxwell Arrest Warrant'. The sender apologizes for a date error in a previous warrant and asks if Judge Smith can sign the attached corrected version.
EFTA00016313.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the SDNY to FBI agents dated June 12, 2020, requesting a follow-up call regarding the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. The email specifically seeks information on Maxwell's active financial accounts, credit cards, a connection to UMB Bank, the status of returns from a subpoena issued on September 25, 2019, and recent SAR/CTR (Suspicious Activity Report) checks.
EFTA00015971.pdf
This document is an email dated December 21, 2020, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'interlocutory appeals' and it contains an attachment titled 'Maxwell_Brief_re_Interlocutory_Appeals.pdf', indicating it relates to the legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00015835.pdf
An email dated August 22, 2021, discussing a draft letter to Judge 'AJN' (likely Alison J. Nathan) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints about VTC (Video Teleconference) access at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The sender notes a deadline of the following day and mentions coordinating with MDC legal counsel for review.
EFTA00015203.pdf
An email thread from June 30, 2020, involving Deputy US Attorney Audrey Strauss (SDNY). The correspondence concerns a '3:30 Q and A prep' session and includes an attachment titled 'Maxwell_possible_QA_v2.docx', suggesting preparations for a press event or legal proceeding regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (who was arrested shortly after, on July 2, 2020).
EFTA00015174.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated October 7, 2021. The email discusses a draft '3500 Cover Letter' (referring to Jencks Act material) and an attachment named 'Maxwell_Cover_Letter', likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The sender asks for review regarding language about a redacted individual.
EFTA00014713.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 23, 2021. It contains a forwarded message from journalist Aaron Katersky inquiring about the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Katersky notes for a 'preview piece' that Maxwell's 'most prominent public accuser' (name redacted) and another individual (name redacted) are not on the government's witness list and asks if there are any issues with this assessment.
EFTA00014709.pdf
An email sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York on November 23, 2021. The email transmits an attachment containing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The document is heavily redacted regarding personal identifiers.
EFTA00014506.pdf
A formal notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated July 18, 2017, announcing a change in the assigned case manager for docket 16-3945cv ([Redacted] v. Maxwell). The document lists Robert A. Katzmann as Chief Judge and references the underlying District Court case (15-cv-7433) presided over by Judge Sweet.
EFTA00014499.pdf
An email dated January 3, 2019, from Stan Pottinger of Edwards Pottinger LLC regarding a confidentiality order in a legal case against Maxwell presided over by Judge Sweet. The email forwards three PDF attachments identified as a Sealed Opinion, a Protective Order, and a notice of Case Manager Assignment, with the body text noting that 'These documents are public.'
EFTA00013300.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It discusses an order issued by Judge Nathan directing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to take specific actions by April 30, 2021. The emails coordinate the filing and transmission of this order to the Judge's chambers.
EFTA00013270.pdf
An internal email from January 8, 2021, between USANYS officials regarding 'Writeups'. The email includes an attachment related to Public Corruption updates for January 2021. The body text mentions a requested write-up on 'Maxwell' followed by redacted bullet points and the word 'obstruction'.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
General life updates and invitations
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Instruction to touch Epstein
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Appointments
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Scheduling an appointment to massage Epstein
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Interaction with Epstein
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Maxwell's personal life, relationships, and her boyfriend...
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Scheduling massages and scheme operations
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Scheduling massages with Jeffrey Epstein
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Mr. Epstein's status
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Culture of silence
Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Setting up appointment times for so-called massages
Maxwell would call Carolyn to set up appointments for massages, particularly in the first year or two.
Travel
Maxwell told Kate that she was very accommodating and that whenever Kate wanted to visit, Maxwell and others ('they') would take care of everything. This conversation happened before Maxwell gave Kate a handbag.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Maxwell Reply
A reply brief filed by the Defendant, Maxwell, which raises an argument about the jury instructions.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity