Laura Menninger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
39
Very Strong
|
43 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
R
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | Civil Trial Conflict for Laura Menninger | Unknown | View |
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-27 | N/A | Laura Menninger sends supplemental letter regarding anticipated testimony of Mr. [Redacted] to US... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Hard drive with discovery materials sent via FedEx to Laura Menninger's office in Colorado. | Colorado | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
EFTA00027072.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 20, 2020, serving as a cover letter for a discovery production. The production includes various materials such as FBI documents from Florida and NY, PBPD materials, and videos, listed with Bates numbers. The letter also addresses the status of data extracted from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties, noting that privilege reviews are ongoing and that the Epstein Estate has not waived privilege.
EFTA00026872.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The correspondence details disputes over the location of the review (FBI Bronx Warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), specifically concerning 'bulky' items such as massage tables, plaster busts, and framed art which the government refused to transport. Significant discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials, including approximately 2,100 nude or obscene electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, which required specific viewing conditions on non-networked laptops due to their nature.
EFTA00026819.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 8, 2020. The government asserts it has met its discovery obligations despite technical issues at the MDC, detailing efforts to reformat files and provide IT support. The letter also addresses Maxwell's conditions of confinement, confirming she must sleep in an isolation cell and undergo weekly body scans, while noting she has access to commissary food, mail, and 13 hours of discovery review time per day. It mentions the FBI possesses 43,500 images from Epstein's residences (3,500 containing nudity) which will be made available for review via a secure laptop brought to the MDC.
EFTA00026813.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, dated October 8, 2020, refuting claims that the government failed to meet discovery obligations. The letter details technical efforts to ensure Maxwell can review digital evidence at the MDC, including the provision of a secure laptop to review 43,500 images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties (3,500 of which contain nudity). It also addresses conditions of confinement, confirming Maxwell remains in an isolation cell for safety, undergoes weekly body scans, and has access to commissary food items.
EFTA00026566.pdf
An email dated February 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to 'MDC Conditions' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00026464.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 24, 2020, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell'. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing titled 'Maxwell_Reply_to_90-day_conditions_ltr.pdf' to a group of attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00025508.pdf
This document is a series of emails from October 2020 concerning discovery production in the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The correspondence details the delivery and pickup of hard drives, the sending of Ms. Maxwell's drive to the MDC, and the scheduling of a prison visit for Ms. Maxwell to review a secure laptop. The emails involve legal teams from the Southern District of New York, Cohen Gresser, and HMFLAW, discussing logistical arrangements for evidence exchange and client access.
EFTA00025378.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (20-3061). Dated September 16, 2020, it serves as a Notice of Docket Activity announcing a scheduling order that sets the due date for Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's brief and the Joint Appendix to October 22, 2020. The notice lists several recipients, including attorneys Ty Gee, Laura Menninger, and Adam Mueller, alongside Deputy Clerk Gerard Whidbee, with other recipient names redacted.
EFTA00025218.pdf
This document is an email dated June 7, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca). The prosecution is informing the defense that a letter regarding MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) conditions is due to the Court that day and requests to know by 8:30 PM if the defense intends to seek any redactions to the attached document.
EFTA00025206.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger, et al.) and Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns scheduling a call to discuss evidence requests and includes the transmission of an index of physical items held in FBI custody by the Miami office. The prosecutor references a previous discovery production from August 2020 and specific Bates ranges for scanned items.
EFTA00025195.pdf
An email chain from February 23, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca) sending a courtesy copy of a bail application filing to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email was forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office with the commentary 'Apparently they think third time's the charm,' referring to Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure bail.
EFTA00025147.pdf
This document is an email dated October 28, 2021, from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers in the Southern District of New York. It serves as a transmittal for the filing of 'Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support of Her Motions in Limine' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). The email was sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
EFTA00025066.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 11, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It formally notifies the defense that the government intends to refer to Jeffrey Epstein and other redacted individuals as co-conspirators during the trial, specifically for the purpose of admitting evidence under the co-conspirator hearsay exception. The letter is marked as Exhibit 1 and designated as confidential under a protective order.
EFTA00025059.pdf
An email from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers, dated October 26, 2021. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the Government's Omnibus Motions in Limine, sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
EFTA00025037.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, etc.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling and procedure for filing a 'request to charge' (jury instructions) with Judge Nathan. The parties discuss extensions, the possibility of filing separate requests rather than a joint one, and agree to a schedule where the Government files first, followed by the Defense's redline or separate filing in early November.
EFTA00025035.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding the production of Jencks Act and Giglio materials for potential trial witnesses. The letter clarifies a stamping error in a previous production (October 11, 2021) involving records 3501.507-516 and explains new labeling protocols for confidential materials to distinguish them from classified documents.
EFTA00024987.pdf
This document is a discovery production letter dated November 24, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the production of confidential records related to JPMC (JPMorgan Chase) and Lockheed Martin, governed by a Protective Order. The letter explains the specific confidentiality markings applied to the produced materials.
EFTA00024931.pdf
An email dated May 5, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Lara [Redacted] to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The prosecutor is sharing a draft letter regarding 'flashlight checks' (as indicated by the attachment filename) pursuant to Judge Nathan's April 29 order, asking the defense to identify any necessary redactions of private medical information before the letter is publicly filed.
EFTA00024912.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in Case 20 Cr. 330. The defense argues strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense also leverages the scheduling dispute to suggest that granting Maxwell bail would resolve the flexibility issues.
EFTA00024911.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated May 11, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email attaches a letter requesting a trial start date of November 8th. Several other attorneys, including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00024907.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Defense attorney Christian Everdell submits a response to the court regarding the self-authentication of birth certificates for alleged minor victims. In an internal forward, a USANYS (prosecution) staff member notes that the defense has 'conceded' on the issue, prompting a colleague to reply 'Nice work!'.
EFTA00024868.pdf
A discovery cover letter dated May 3, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss's office to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The letter accompanies the production of photographs stamped SDNY_GM_02753399 through SDNY_GM_02753431, noting that the materials and the letter itself are designated as confidential under a Protective Order.
EFTA00024791.pdf
A discovery production letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated October 28, 2021. The letter lists produced materials including a scanned contact book page, records from the United Kingdom, and materials from the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, noting confidentiality designations under a protective order.
EFTA00024664.pdf
This document is an email thread between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in 'US v. Maxwell'. The defense advocates strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the Government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense suggests that consenting to bail would resolve the scheduling flexibility issues.
EFTA00024235.pdf
This document is an email dated October 29, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email notifies counsel of an additional discovery production being made via USAfx and discusses logistical arrangements for providing these materials to Ms. Maxwell at the MDC, either via CD or hard drive.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Providing revised spreadsheets for mini-VHS tapes. Confirming Marshals will bring Maxwell to MDC by 4:30pm, setting review times at 500 Pearl from 9:30am-4:30pm starting April 13th.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussing logistics for Bronx view. Raising issues about 'Highly Confidential' vs 'bulky' items, specific Florida evidence items, and electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming evidence review schedule starting April 13th at 500 Pearl St; providing updated spreadsheets.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming updated spreadsheets and requesting particulars for visiting the Bronx warehouse to photograph excluded items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Raising issues about spreadsheets: items marked for Bronx that need to be at 500 Pearl (highly confidential but not bulky); questions about photographing bulky photos; questions about electronic surveillance files.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Confirming Maxwell's transport to 500 Pearl on April 13. Discussing annotated evidence spreadsheets, mini-VHS tapes, and items at FBI headquarters (shredded paper).
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Discussing logistics for Bronx warehouse visit; 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photo rules; witness statements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Addressing logistics: FBI inspections at Bronx warehouse, designation of 'Confidential' vs 'Highly Confidential' photos, witness statements, use of proffer rooms at 500 Pearl, and bringing 2,100 electronic images to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications regarding photography of items at Bronx warehouse and protocols for electronic media.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to government proposal; demanding access to photograph items at Bronx warehouse; refusing massage tables.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Accepting proposal with modifications. Requesting access to inspect 'excluded' items at Bronx warehouse. Discussing equipment for playing media and space requirements.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, cash, and bulky items (plaster busts, stuffed dog) to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for tapes.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response to defense requests. Refusing to move massage tables, electronic devices that can't be turned on, and bulky items like plaster busts/stuffed dog to 500 Pearl. Agreeing to move 15-20 boxes of physical evidence.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to move all physical evidence to 500 Pearl; agreeing to exclude massage tables and cash from transport; discussing 2,100 highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Response to defense requests; refusing to transport all physical evidence; discussing 'bulky' items like massage tables and plaster busts.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Response regarding logistics for physical evidence review. Refusing to move massage tables/bulky items to Pearl St. Explaining image categories.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Response regarding physical evidence. Refusing to bring massage tables, framed pictures, and plaster busts to 500 Pearl. Discussing playback equipment for recordings.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)...
Stating the Gov proposal is inadequate. Demanding laptops/devices be allowed, and questioning why 2,100 highly confidential images were not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating previous proposal was inadequate; demanding physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl; requesting laptops/devices be allowed; asking about 2,100+7 highly confidential images not previously shared.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed response regarding deficiencies in prosecution's proposal for evidence review. Requests transport of evidence to 500 Pearl St, permission for laptops, and segregation of 'highly confidential' items.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Stating the proposal is inadequate for defense. demanding laptops be allowed, all physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl (except massage tables), and questioning why 2,100 'highly confidential' images were not shared earlier.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Complaint that current proposal prevents meaningful defense; requesting all physical evidence be moved to 500 Pearl.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Rejecting proposal as inadequate; insisting on laptops/devices during review; demanding physical evidence be brought to 500 Pearl; questioning missing highly confidential images.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Detailed explanation of 2,100 electronic images (nude/partially nude); explanation of physical evidence storage in Bronx vs Florida list.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Provides details on 3 categories of highly confidential images (2,100 from devices, 3,400 from discs, 7 hard copy). Outlines logistics for review at FBI Bronx warehouse and 500 Pearl St.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity