Reiter
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Detective
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Law enforcement donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Suspect investigator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peter Elwell
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Rick Lincoln
|
Professional peer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Peter Elwell
|
Professional manager subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Contacted assigned to |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Involved in case of |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Source informant |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Informant source |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Source |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Source of information |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recarey
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Reiter referred the Epstein case to the FBI to check for federal violations. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's team hires private investigators to surveil Reiter and Recarey, including picking throu... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Decision to issue a search warrant | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein visits police station with $90,000 donation and Nadia Marcinkova. | Police Station | View |
| N/A | N/A | Reiter observes Epstein with Nadia Marcinkova at a donation event; notes she looked afraid and wa... | Unspecified event | View |
| 2025-09-01 | N/A | Epstein calls Reiter to offer funds for police equipment, signaling he knows about the investigat... | Phone call (Palm Beach) | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Deposition | Reiter gave a deposition where he stated Villafaña sent him a letter with a victim list around th... | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-28 | N/A | Villafaña reports back to Sloman about Reiter's intention to notify victims. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-27 | Communication | Villafaña contacts Reiter and Edwards regarding Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| 2001-03-01 | N/A | Peter Elwell promoted Reiter from assistant chief to chief. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2001-03-01 | N/A | Reiter promoted from assistant chief to chief. | Palm Beach | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Investigation of William Kennedy Smith for rape (later acquitted). | Palm Beach (Kennedy family ... | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Reiter, 848 F.2d 336, 340 (2d Cir. 1988) | Second Circuit | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Court case | U.S. v. Reiter, 848 F.2d 336 (2d Cir. 1988) | 2d Cir. | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Legal case decision | Decision in the case of U.S. v. Reiter. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Court case | Citation to United States v. Reiter, 848 F.2d 336, 340 (2d Cir. 1988). | Second Circuit | View |
| 1984-01-01 | N/A | Investigation into drug overdose death of David Kennedy. | Palm Beach | View |
| 1981-01-01 | N/A | Reiter joined the Palm Beach Police Department. | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 0001-05-01 | N/A | Reiter wrote a letter to State Attorney Barry Krischer criticizing his handling of the Epstein case. | Palm Beach | View |
Phone_Messages_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains scanned telephone message books from the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office (likely Barry Krischer's office) spanning from 2005 to 2009. The messages document high-frequency communication between the State Attorney ('BK' or 'Mr. K') and Epstein's defense team (Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, Bruce Lyons), as well as significant media inquiries regarding Epstein's indictment, prison sentence, and potential charges in the Virgin Islands. A critical handwritten note advises 'No don't give to Feds our case unless they take all,' highlighting the jurisdictional tension between state and federal prosecutors.
EFTA00032205.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the SDNY, FBI, and NYPD regarding the discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence details requests for specific evidence, including 'trash pulls', message pad scans, FBI Sentinel files, CART reports, and search warrant returns from New York, the Virgin Islands, and New Hampshire. The FBI notes they are actively working to segregate and log nude/semi-nude images from the seized digital evidence before production.
EFTA00026741.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from August 18-20, 2020, between the FBI/NYPD Child Exploitation Task Force and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the discovery process in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence details the logistics of transferring physical and digital evidence, including message pads (with and without post-it notes), VHS tapes, microcassettes, and materials provided by a source named 'Reiter.' Significant discussion focuses on the separation of nude/semi-nude images from the evidence before production to the defense, as well as requests for specific warrant returns (including a New Hampshire premises warrant) and FBI Sentinel files.
EFTA00023957.pdf
This document is a series of emails between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI/NYPD Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding the discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell case in August 2020. The correspondence details requests for specific evidence, including Grand Jury transcripts, search warrant returns (NH premises), FBI Sentinel files, and scans of message pads (both with and without post-it notes). The FBI agent confirms the availability of files from New York, Virgin Islands, and Florida, and discusses the logistical challenge of filtering out nude/semi-nude images from seized digital devices before turning them over to the defense.
EFTA00023673.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the FBI (New York Field Office/Child Exploitation Task Force) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell case in August 2020. The correspondence details the transfer of evidence, including VHS tapes, microcassettes, newspaper articles provided by 'Reiter', and scans of message pads (specifically addressing issues with post-it notes obscuring text). The emails also discuss the redaction and withholding of nude/semi-nude images from the discovery materials provided to the defense, as well as requests for search warrant returns from New Hampshire and the 20 mag 6719 warrant.
DOJ-OGR-00023306.tif
This document, an excerpt from a legal report, discusses the handling of victim notification in the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically focusing on the roles of Sloman, Villafaña, and PBPD Chief Reiter, and the subsequent review of prosecutor Acosta's actions by OPR. It analyzes whether federal victim notification laws (CVRA/VRRA) applied to state court proceedings and concludes that Acosta's deferral of victim notification to the State Attorney's Office did not constitute professional misconduct. Legal citations and quotes from individuals involved are provided to support the analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00021085.jpg
This document is page 38 of a legal brief (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) filed in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It contains legal arguments attempting to distance the current case from the precedent set in *U.S. v. Annabi*, arguing that *Annabi* is an outlier regarding whether a plea agreement in one district binds another. The text consists primarily of extensive footnotes citing various Second Circuit decisions (*Prisco*, *Ashraf*, *Salameh*, etc.) that limited plea agreements to specific US Attorney's Offices, supporting the government's position against the Appellant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell).
DOJ-OGR-00021058.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing from Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It is a table of authorities listing numerous U.S. court cases, dating from 1926 to 2022, which are cited within the main document. Each citation includes the case name, legal reporter information, and the page numbers where the case is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00020989.jpg
This page from a legal document details the legal framework used by the Second Circuit to determine if multiple charges constitute a single conspiracy, which is relevant to double jeopardy claims. It lists the eight "Korfant factors" and explains the burden-shifting process where a defendant must first make a non-frivolous claim, after which the burden shifts to the government to prove the conspiracies are distinct. The text relies heavily on citations to previous court cases to establish these legal standards.
DOJ-OGR-00021842.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that critiques the reasoning of a prior court decision, 'Annabi'. The author argues that 'Annabi' departed from the established legal doctrine that a plea agreement with a specific U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) only binds that office, not the entire U.S. government, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The text cites numerous other cases in its footnotes to support this traditional, more limited interpretation of such agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00021828.jpg
This document is page 4 (labeled 'iii') of a Table of Authorities from a legal brief filed on November 1, 2024, in Case 22-1426 (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal). It lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including a 2024 Second Circuit decision in *U.S. v. Maxwell*, along with citations to other federal cases such as *U.S. v. Papa* and *U.S. v. Persico*. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00021472.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report detailing the failure of the USAO (specifically Acosta, Villafaña, and Sloman) to coordinate with the State Attorney's Office regarding victim notification for Jeffrey Epstein's June 2008 plea hearing. It reveals that despite a draft letter in December 2007 intended to provide a list of victims to the state, no evidence exists that the letter was sent, leaving state prosecutors (Krischer and Belohlavek) unaware of the federal identified victims. A footnote highlights that Epstein's attorneys explicitly asked the USAO not to inform victims of their rights under state charges.
DOJ-OGR-00021434.jpg
This legal document details conflicting accounts regarding the notification of victims for Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008, state plea hearing. It focuses on communications between prosecutor Villafaña, investigator Reiter, and victim's attorney Edwards, particularly concerning a list of victims that was created and subsequently destroyed. The document highlights discrepancies in recollections from various depositions and declarations about what information was shared and with whom, forming a key part of the CVRA litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00021407.jpg
This document details communications from September 2007 concerning a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Case Agent Villafaña, prosecutors Acosta and Lourie, and defense attorney Lefkowitz discussed how to handle the NPA's disclosure, with a focus on preventing it from becoming public while navigating legal requirements and informing victims. Villafaña also attempted to coordinate the appointment of an attorney representative for the victims and sought guidance on what information could be shared with them and other agents.
DOJ-OGR-00021390.jpg
This document is a timeline detailing key events from 2006 to 2020 related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It outlines actions taken by the FBI, USAO, and DOJ officials, including Villafaña, Sloman, and Acosta, regarding victim interviews and notifications surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and state court plea. The timeline also tracks subsequent legal challenges by victims, court rulings on CVRA violations, and major developments in the case, such as Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.
DOJ-OGR-00021287.jpg
This document details the conflicts that arose immediately following the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), focusing on the September-October 2007 period. The central issue was the selection of an attorney representative for the victims, where AUSA Villafaña's choice, Lefkowitz, was challenged by her colleague Sloman due to a potential conflict of interest, as Lefkowitz was recommended by an AUSA Villafaña was dating.
DOJ-OGR-00021189.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a report, likely from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), concerning the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the report's structure, which covers the factual background, the roles of various federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies (including the DOJ, FBI, and Palm Beach Police), the controversial non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and the timeline of the initial investigation from 2005-2006.
DOJ-OGR-00010372.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing, outlines the Second Circuit's legal framework for determining whether multiple charges constitute a single conspiracy or distinct conspiracies, thereby implicating double jeopardy concerns. It details the eight 'Korfant factors' used in this analysis and describes the burden-shifting framework where a defendant must first make a non-frivolous showing of a single conspiracy, after which the burden shifts to the Government to prove otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00023228.jpg
This document is a timeline graphic from a Department of Justice report detailing key events surrounding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) analysis in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It tracks internal DOJ communications, victim notifications, and court actions from 2006 to 2008, with an additional sidebar covering legal developments up to 2020. Key events include the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the deferral of victim notification regarding the plea deal, and subsequent court rulings finding that the U.S. violated the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019197.jpg
This document contains pages 80 and 81 from the book 'Filthy Rich,' stamped as a House Oversight document. It details the Palm Beach Police Department's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically noting that his home appeared 'scrubbed' before a search warrant was executed. The text highlights the unusual counter-surveillance tactics employed by Epstein's defense, including hiring private investigators to tail detectives Reiter and Recarey and search their trash.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019193.jpg
This document is a scanned excerpt (pages 76-77) from the book 'Filthy Rich', contained within a House Oversight evidence file. It details a graphic account by a victim named 'Alison' regarding a sexual assault involving Jeffrey Epstein and Nadia Marcinkova, for which Alison was paid $1,000. The text also describes the police investigation led by Detective Recarey and Officer Pagan, noting that corroborating statements from girls like Wendy Dobbs led 'Reiter' to decide there was sufficient evidence for a search warrant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019150.jpg
This document contains a page from a James Patterson book describing an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, highlighting the urgency to find victims visiting his house on El Brillo Way. A second section, titled "Alison: September 11," describes media dynamics and mentions a tip received by WPTV regarding prostitution at a local high school.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019149.jpg
This document contains pages 32 and 33 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details Detective Reiter's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, including a specific incident where Epstein called Reiter offering funds for a 'firearms simulator,' which Reiter interpreted as Epstein knowing about the investigation. The text also identifies Nadia Marcinkova as a 19-year-old living with Epstein who was described as a 'slave,' and mentions a woman named Wendy as a known procurer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019148.jpg
This document is a scanned page (pg 32-33) from a James Patterson book, filed under House Oversight records. It details Police Chief Reiter's recollections of early complaints regarding young women at Epstein's home, which police dismissed as likely adult prostitution and 'common.' It describes a specific incident where Epstein visited the station to deliver a $90,000 donation, accompanied by a terrified-looking 19-year-old Nadia Marcinkova, whom he refused to introduce.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018921.jpg
A newspaper article by Larry Keller reporting on the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically noting that Epstein passed a polygraph claiming he did not know the ages of the girls involved. The article details a failed plea deal from April, allegations of witness intimidation and harassment by private investigators, and the unsealing of an indictment. It highlights the legal maneuvering by Epstein's high-profile legal team and public perception regarding the treatment of wealthy defendants connected to figures like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-01-01 | Received | Town of Palm Beach | Reiter | $144,000.00 | Annual salary for Police Chief Reiter (stated a... | View |
| 2001-03-01 | Received | Town of Palm Beach | Reiter | $144,000.00 | Annual salary as Police Chief. | View |
| 1981-01-01 | Received | University of Pit... | Reiter | $20,000.00 | Salary for patrol job Reiter left. | View |
B.B. vs. Epstein
Reiter testified about police knowledge of women at Epstein's house and their decision not to pursue prostitution charges.
Arms simulator
Mention of calls to Reiter regarding an arms simulator.
Firearms Simulator / Investigation Probe
Epstein asked if Palm Beach had bought the firearms simulator yet and offered funds to provide them.
Epstein case handling
Called Krischer's actions 'highly unusual' and urged him to consider disqualification from the prosecution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity