SARAH KELLEN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co defendants |
49
Very Strong
|
45 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
22
Very Strong
|
31 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Client |
20
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Bruce E. Reinhart
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Superior subordinate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Supervisory |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC.
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC.
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brian Vickers
|
Spouse |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Plaintiff by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, aided by SARAH KELLEN, while Plaintiff was a minor. | Palm Beach mansion of JEFFR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN arranging for Plaintiff to come to Epstein's mansion for 'massages'. | Palm Beach mansion of JEFFR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiff being brought to and escorted within Epstein's mansion for 'massages'. | Palm Beach mansion of JEFFR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN paying Plaintiff for 'sessions' with JEFFREY EPSTEIN. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN arranging for gifts to be sent to Plaintiff. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN taking nude photographs of Plaintiff at JEFFREY EPSTEIN's request and paying Plainti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conspiracy activities involving scheduling massages | The house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of video disks extracted by PBSO Computer Crime Unit showing Epstein, Sarah Kellen, Nadia ... | Epstein's Office (on video) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visoski met Sarah Kellen. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Teresa Helm was sexually trafficked by Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Ghislaine Maxwell. She was recr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | CL returned to house after call from Sarah Kellen, coerced into naked massage and sexual acts. | Epstein's House, El Brillo Way | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Kellen takes over as Epstein's primary assistant. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial evidence presented regarding Sarah Kellen's employment and role. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Approximate timeframe discussed regarding Sarah Kellen's transition to becoming Epstein's primary... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of two pilots regarding Sarah Kellen's employment | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Kellen started working for Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights with Bill Clinton | Epstein's Plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments scheduled by Sarah Kellen where Maxwell was present. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights on Epstein's private jet involving Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. | Epstein's private jet | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation analysis of Sarah Kellen's phone records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Kellen took over the scheduling of massages. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
008.pdf
This document is a motion filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on August 8, 2008, requesting an extension to file a response to the complaint in the case of Jane Doe #1. Epstein's lawyers argue that the deadline should be aligned with parallel cases (Jane Doe Nos. 2-5) to September 4, 2008, to promote judicial economy. The document notes that co-defendants Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen had not yet been served at the time of filing.
008-01.pdf
A court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe #1 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants the Defendant's Motion to Align Response Date. Copies were furnished to several attorneys including Bruce Reinhart and Jack Goldberger.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from August 5, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra denied the defendants' motion to file documents under seal, ruling that the U.S. Attorney's objections and confidentiality clauses did not outweigh the public's right to access court records, ordering the clerk to unseal specific docket entries.
003.pdf
This document is a Motion for Enlargement of Time filed on July 25, 2008, in the Southern District of Florida civil case Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, et al. Defendants Epstein and Sarah Kellen request an extension to answer the complaint until 10 days after a decision is made on their contemporaneous motion to stay the case, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3509 regarding civil stays during parallel criminal proceedings involving child victims. The document includes a service list detailing legal representation for all parties, including Bruce Reinhart as counsel for Sarah Kellen.
002.pdf
Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen filed a request for oral argument on July 25, 2008, in the Southern District of Florida regarding a motion to stay civil proceedings pending the resolution of a criminal action. The document lists legal representation for all parties, including Jane Doe (Plaintiff) and Haley Robson (Co-Defendant). Attorneys Michael R. Tein and Guy A. Lewis are the primary signatories for Epstein.
001.pdf
This document is a Notice of Removal filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson, seeking to move a civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The defendants argue that the non-diverse defendant, Haley Robson, was fraudulently joined solely to defeat diversity jurisdiction and prevent removal. Attached as Exhibit A is a deposition transcript of Jane Doe (whose name is redacted) taken on February 20, 2008, in a related criminal case, where she is questioned about her age, MySpace profiles, inconsistencies in her statements to police regarding sexual contact with Epstein, and her interactions with various attorneys and law enforcement officials.
001-02.pdf
This document is a summons and affidavit of service related to a lawsuit filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in Palm Beach County, Florida. Jane Doe, represented by her mother, is the plaintiff against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The document details the service of the summons on Sarah Kellen in New York City on April 19, 2008, and includes important legal notices in English, Spanish, and French regarding the lawsuit and the defendant's responsibilities.
001-01.pdf
This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.
021.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano (Jane Doe No. 2) opposing a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview to avoid deposition. Zinoview, who worked as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer starting in November 2005, claimed he had no relevant knowledge of Epstein's legal matters. The Plaintiff argues that Zinoview worked for Epstein during the police investigation period and likely has relevant observations, regardless of whether he discussed legal matters with Epstein.
017.pdf
Legal filing from November 2009 in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys reply to a response regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The document notes that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes related to the Epstein case, and alludes to serious ethical and criminal issues involving the RRA firm that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.
016.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, claims he has no relevant information regarding Epstein's criminal or civil cases, particularly concerning events prior to September 2005. The motion cites legal precedents regarding the scope of discovery and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c) to argue against the deposition.
020.pdf
This document is an agreed motion filed on May 13, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103 against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff requests a one-week extension to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss because the parties are in the process of resolving the matter via settlement, which would render the motion moot. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing legal counsel for Epstein, Co-Defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and plaintiffs in several related cases.
016.pdf
This document is an agreed motion for an extension of time filed on April 22, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80309-WJZ). Plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell, requests an extension until May 13, 2010, to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss because she is leaving for a vacation in Italy the following day. The motion notes that Epstein's counsel, Robert Critton, agrees to the extension, and the document includes a service list of attorneys involved in this and related cases.
012.pdf
This document is a Motion to Transfer filed on April 1, 2010, by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103 in the US District Court, Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff seeks to transfer her case against Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Marra's division to consolidate it with other similar pending cases, specifically 'Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein'. The document includes a service list detailing legal counsel for Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and plaintiffs in several related cases.
059.pdf
This document is a motion filed on November 20, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requesting permission for Jeffrey Epstein to attend mediation in the case involving Carolyn Andriano (C.M.A.). The motion notes that a previous no-contact order exists regarding Andriano, but her counsel has no objection to Epstein attending the deposition, mediation, or trial. The document includes a service list detailing the attorneys involved in this and related cases, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
057.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on November 16, 2009, regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA). The filing notes that the Department of Justice seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes specifically related to Epstein cases. The document highlights scheduling conflicts involving the deposition of Herbert Stettin (RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer) and alludes to potential ethical or criminal issues within RRA that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.
055.pdf
This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed on November 9, 2009, by Igor Zinoviev, a third-party witness and Jeffrey Epstein's driver/bodyguard since November 2005. Zinoviev seeks to prevent or limit his deposition, arguing he has no knowledge relevant to the civil cases as his employment with Epstein began after the alleged events, and he has not discussed Epstein's criminal or civil cases with him. The motion cites legal precedents on the scope of discovery and includes a list of attorneys involved in various related cases.
024.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on May 29, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs request leave to file their response to Epstein's motion to stay under seal because it references the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), or alternatively, to unseal the NPA. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal representation for Epstein (including Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger), Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and numerous other Jane Doe plaintiffs.
022.pdf
This document is a legal reply brief filed on May 29, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs seek to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that revealing their identities would subject them to harassment, shame, and further trauma, particularly given their status as victims of sexual exploitation as minors. The filing also discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), statutory minimum damages under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and accuses Epstein of using the threat of publicity to intimidate victims into settling.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein in May 2009. The motion requests the court to order Epstein to preserve evidence related to allegations of sexual abuse, specifically citing evidence seized during a 2005 police search and other electronic/physical records located across his six international properties. The document lists numerous attorneys involved in related cases and references Epstein's previous guilty plea in 2008.
086.pdf
This document is a response filed by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano on November 28, 2009, opposing a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview to prevent his deposition. Zinoview, who worked as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer starting in November 2005, claims he has no relevant knowledge of legal matters involving Epstein. The Plaintiff argues that because Zinoview worked for Epstein during the active police investigation (2005-2006), he likely possesses relevant information regarding activities at the Epstein residence, and that a complete bar on his deposition is legally unjustified.
082.pdf
This document is a Reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2009 requesting a permanent order for the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The filing highlights that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including about 13 boxes related to Epstein cases, amidst concerns of 'serious ethical and potentially criminal issues' at the firm. The document also argues against delaying the deposition of RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer, Herbert Stettin, citing upcoming trial deadlines.
080.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, requesting a protective order to prevent his deposition in the case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, who worked as a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, argues he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment began after the alleged events and he never discussed the criminal or civil cases with Epstein.
064.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Compliance' filed on July 28, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It pertains to multiple civil cases filed by 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs against Epstein. The filing states that while the court ordered the parties to agree on a preservation of evidence order, they were unable to reach a full agreement, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and defendants, including Sarah Kellen.
038.pdf
This document is a Motion to Reschedule Hearing filed on May 29, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Robert C. Josefsberg, representing Plaintiffs Jane Doe 101 and 102, requests to move a hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, because he will be attending his 50th College Reunion in Hanover, New Hampshire. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the legal teams associated with Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and various plaintiffs in related cases.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $0.00 | Paid Plaintiff for 'sessions' with JEFFREY EPSTEIN | View |
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $0.00 | Paid Plaintiff for posing for photographs | View |
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $15,000.00 | Demanded judgment for damages in excess of fift... | View |
Phone call
Incoming call, 11:04 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:48 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 8:35 PM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 11:15 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 11:16 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:58 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:36 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 4:30 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:33 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:57 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 10:11 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 7:27 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:55 AM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 9:38 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:53 AM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 9:53 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:10 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:07 AM.
Phone call
Incoming call, 9:14 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 9:37 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 3:03 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 4:32 PM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 11:43 AM.
Phone call
Outgoing call, 4:33 PM.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity