| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co defendants |
49
Very Strong
|
45 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
22
Very Strong
|
31 | |
|
person
Bruce Reinhart
|
Client |
20
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Bruce E. Reinhart
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Superior subordinate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Supervisory |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC.
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
SHOPPERS TRAVEL, INC.
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brian Vickers
|
Spouse |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Plaintiff by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, aided by SARAH KELLEN, while Plaintiff was a minor. | Palm Beach mansion of JEFFR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN arranging for Plaintiff to come to Epstein's mansion for 'massages'. | Palm Beach mansion of JEFFR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plaintiff being brought to and escorted within Epstein's mansion for 'massages'. | Palm Beach mansion of JEFFR... | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN paying Plaintiff for 'sessions' with JEFFREY EPSTEIN. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN arranging for gifts to be sent to Plaintiff. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | SARAH KELLEN taking nude photographs of Plaintiff at JEFFREY EPSTEIN's request and paying Plainti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conspiracy activities involving scheduling massages | The house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of video disks extracted by PBSO Computer Crime Unit showing Epstein, Sarah Kellen, Nadia ... | Epstein's Office (on video) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visoski met Sarah Kellen. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Teresa Helm was sexually trafficked by Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Ghislaine Maxwell. She was recr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | CL returned to house after call from Sarah Kellen, coerced into naked massage and sexual acts. | Epstein's House, El Brillo Way | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Kellen takes over as Epstein's primary assistant. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial evidence presented regarding Sarah Kellen's employment and role. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Approximate timeframe discussed regarding Sarah Kellen's transition to becoming Epstein's primary... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of two pilots regarding Sarah Kellen's employment | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Kellen started working for Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights with Bill Clinton | Epstein's Plane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments scheduled by Sarah Kellen where Maxwell was present. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights on Epstein's private jet involving Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. | Epstein's private jet | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation analysis of Sarah Kellen's phone records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sarah Kellen took over the scheduling of massages. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. The defense argues against a 'leadership enhancement' for Ghislaine Maxwell, citing testimony from Larry Visoski and Cimberly Espinosa to prove that Sarah Kellen was Jeffrey Epstein's assistant, not Maxwell's subordinate. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) counters by citing testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who stated Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence for massage appointments even after Kellen took over scheduling duties.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 31, labeled SA-400) filed on 06/29/2023. It details legal arguments regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's leadership role in the conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Moe (government) argues that Maxwell acted as the 'lady of the house' and supervised Sarah Kellen, while Mr. Everdell (defense) disputes the government's interpretation of case law regarding the supervision of other criminal participants.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated June 29, 2023, likely from an appeal hearing (Case 22-1426). The discussion involves an attorney, Ms. Moe, arguing to the Court that Ghislaine Maxwell held a leadership role over Sarah Kellen within the criminal conspiracy. The argument posits that as the scheme evolved, Kellen was brought in as a subordinate to handle tasks previously performed by Maxwell (such as scheduling massage appointments), thereby elevating Maxwell's status in the hierarchy.
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, who is arguing against the credibility of a witness named Carolyn. Menninger asserts there is no physical evidence, such as phone or FedEx records, to support Carolyn's claim of being contacted by Ghislaine Maxwell. She further uses the testimony of Carolyn's boyfriend, Shawn, to contradict Carolyn's story regarding timelines, drug use, and who was calling their shared phone.
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Menninger, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the testimonies of accusers, including Carolyn, Jane, and Annie, are unreliable because their memories were manipulated and changed over time. She suggests this was motivated by a desire for financial compensation and to hold someone accountable for the actions of the deceased Jeffrey Epstein, and she cites an expert, Professor Loftus, to challenge the validity of how these memories allegedly formed.
This document is a page from the summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell was fully aware of the sexual abuse occurring in Epstein's house. The text highlights testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who stated in a 2009 deposition that Epstein never called her directly; instead, Maxwell or Sarah Kellen would call to schedule 'massages'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa identifies Sarah Kellen from a photograph (Government's Exhibit 327) and testifies that Kellen was hired by Jeffrey Epstein between 2000 and 2002. While uncertain of Kellen's specific job title, Espinosa states that Kellen frequently accompanied Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa by attorney Mr. Everdell. The witness identifies 'Sarah Kellen' as the person who sat in the office where Ghislaine Maxwell used to sit. The remainder of the page concerns procedural discussions between the defense, prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz), and the Judge regarding the publication of 'Government's Exhibit 327' to the jury.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features an argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Comey argues that the defense has already established that the witness sued Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in 2009 but did not name Ghislaine Maxwell, and that further questioning on this topic is cumulative and prejudicial.
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca is arguing to admit a prior document for 'impeachment by omission,' stating that the witness (Carolyn) filed a complaint and was interviewed by the FBI in 2008 regarding sexual abuse by Epstein and his employee Sarah Kellen, but notably failed to mention Ghislaine Maxwell at that time. Pagliuca argues this contradicts the government's current narrative which emphasizes Maxwell's role while downplaying Kellen's.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on paragraphs 206 and 207 of a complaint, with specific mentions of Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen. The witness denies that paragraph 207, which mentions Sarah Kellen, was about engaging her in prostitution.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning establishes that Carolyn filed a lawsuit against Epstein and Sarah Kellen in 2008 and was represented by lawyer Jack Scarola in a claim with the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. The transcript also mentions that Carolyn moved from Florida to Georgia in 2003 after being told by someone named Sarah that Epstein wanted to take her photograph.
This page contains a cross-examination transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness about her previous deposition testimony given in 2009 related to a civil lawsuit she filed against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The proceedings are momentarily interrupted to adjust the display size of an exhibit (3505-043) for the court.
This document is page 113 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Carolyn testifies that Sarah Kellen called her on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, offering $500-$600 to take nude photographs of her at the Palm Beach house. Carolyn also describes massage appointments where she would undress and massage Epstein for approximately 45 minutes.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by Ms. Comey. Carolyn testifies regarding the scheduling logistics for massages at Jeffrey Epstein's house, stating that initially Ghislaine Maxwell would call to set up times, but later Sarah Kellen or Carolyn herself would make the calls. The witness also confirms seeing Maxwell in an office area off the kitchen at Epstein's house even after Sarah Kellen began handling the scheduling.
This document is a page from a Government sentencing filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing for a 'Four-Point Leadership Enhancement' under sentencing guidelines. It asserts that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) was a leader of an 'otherwise extensive' criminal conspiracy involving Jeffrey Epstein, spanning the UK, Virgin Islands, and three states. The text cites testimony from victims (Carolyn, Virginia) and staff (Juan Alessi, pilots) to demonstrate the scale of the operation and the defendant's role in recruiting victims and managing Epstein's properties.
This document is a printout of a webpage from New York Social Diary, dated April 20, 2004. It features photographs of various individuals at a social event, most notably showing known Jeffrey Epstein associates Nadia Marcinkova, Sarah Kellen, and Teela Davies posing together in one photograph. The document was processed as part of a DOJ Public Records Request.
This document is a page from a Palm Beach Police Department affidavit detailing a witness statement regarding sexual activities at Jeffrey Epstein's residence. The witness, who began visiting at age sixteen, describes a routine involving massages, sexual acts with Epstein, and paid sexual encounters with an associate named Nada Marcinkova while Epstein watched.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details the investigation into a burglary at Jeffrey Epstein's residence on October 6, 2003. Detectives met with Epstein's assistant Sarah Kellen to retrieve surveillance footage showing a male suspect inside the home. The investigation led police to the Towers Condominium to locate a suspect named Alessi, though the building manager claimed the surveillance system there was broken during the relevant timeframe.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated September 1, 2006, documents a burglary reported by Jeffrey Epstein on October 5, 2003. Epstein claimed that approximately $3,500 in cash was stolen from his briefcase and a Glock handgun was taken from a bookshelf at his residence at 358 El Brillo Way. The report also notes that Epstein suspected cash had been stolen on two previous occasions in August and September of 2003.
This document is a faxed printout of a news article describing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney's office regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the police chief's frustration with the lenient plea deal and initial indictment, the involvement of high-profile lawyers like Kenneth Starr, and Epstein's claims of anti-Semitism. The text also describes Epstein's home environment, possession of firearms (Glock), and lists several female associates including Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen.
This probable cause affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated September 20, 2005, details an interview with a woman named Robson. Robson describes her own experience giving a massage to Jeffrey Epstein, during which he made unwanted sexual advances, and how he subsequently paid her $200 to recruit other girls for him. The document focuses on Robson recruiting a specific victim, detailing the arrangements made with Epstein's assistant, Sarah Kellen, the transportation of the victim to Epstein's house, and the payments made to both Robson and the victim.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa identifies Sarah Kellen in a photograph (Government's Exhibit 327) and testifies that Kellen arrived towards the end of Espinosa's employment, specifically between 2000 and 2002. Espinosa states she did not know Kellen's specific job title but observed that Kellen accompanied Jeffrey Epstein to his properties and was essentially always where he was.
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies Sarah Kellen as having occupied an office previously used by Ghislaine. The transcript also captures a procedural discussion between the attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Pomerantz) and the judge regarding the presentation of Government's Exhibit 327 to the jury.
This document is a page from a legal transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies former colleagues, naming Leslie Roth and Suann Pisap as executive assistants, and Emmy Taylor and Sarah Kellen as personal assistants who were present in the office. The questioning specifically focuses on the witness's recollection of seeing Taylor and Kellen during the 1996-1998 time period.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $0.00 | Paid Plaintiff for 'sessions' with JEFFREY EPSTEIN | View |
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $0.00 | Paid Plaintiff for posing for photographs | View |
| N/A | Paid | SARAH KELLEN | plaintiff | $15,000.00 | Demanded judgment for damages in excess of fift... | View |
Outgoing call, 11:02 AM.
Outgoing call, 3:03 PM.
Outgoing call, 4:32 PM.
Outgoing call, 4:33 PM.
Outgoing call, 6:51 PM.
Outgoing call, 9:38 PM.
Incoming call, 9:47 PM.
Outgoing call, 11:42 AM.
Outgoing call, 9:46 PM.
Outgoing call, 9:43 PM.
Outgoing call, 9:33 AM.
Outgoing call, 9:12 PM.
Incoming call, 10:17 AM.
Outgoing call, 10:15 AM.
Outgoing call, 9:45 AM.
Outgoing call, 9:44 AM.
Incoming call, 9:35 AM.
Incoming call, 10:34 AM.
Incoming call, 10:34 AM.
Incoming call, 10:29 AM.
Incoming call, 9:13 AM.
Outgoing call, 12:47 PM.
Outgoing call, 12:46 PM.
Outgoing call, 12:43 PM.
Outgoing call, 12:41 PM.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity