MR. EPSTEIN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
30
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employee |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employment |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Employee |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Gift giver receiver |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-07 | N/A | Case disposition conference set in the Epstein case (according to FBI info). | Court | View |
| 2008-01-04 | N/A | Deadline for Epstein to begin serving his sentence according to the agreement. | Jail/Prison | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Civil lawsuit | Mr. Scarola represented Carolyn in a civil lawsuit against Mr. Epstein and Sarah Kellen. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Mr. Epstein made a state-court guilty plea as required by the 2007 NPA. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Mr. Epstein held plea discussions regarding witness tampering in Florida. | Florida | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Start of CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) litigation. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal event | Mr. Epstein's conviction(s) for procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution and for s... | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal conviction | Mr. Epstein was convicted of two Florida sex crimes involving an underage girl. | Florida | View |
| 2007-12-14 | Plea hearing | Mr. Epstein's change of plea and sentencing hearing. | state court | View |
| 2007-09-24 | Legal agreement | Date of Mr. Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | Florida | View |
| 2007-09-21 | Plea negotiations | A series of communications occurred between the prosecution (Acosta, Villafaña, Lourie) and defen... | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-20 | N/A | Plea negotiations with Epstein's defense counsel are not going well. Ann Marie Villafana gave the... | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Mr. Epstein's legal team negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with the federal government. | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Investigation out of the Southern District of Florida. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Agreement | An agreement was reached regarding the prosecution of Mr. Epstein, which contained an express con... | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Legal proposal | Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that Mr. Epstein admit to verbally harassing victims in connection... | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Investigation out of the Southern District of Florida concerning Mr. Epstein. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | Krischer charged Mr. Epstein with one count of aggravated assault. No mention of underage girls o... | N/A | View |
| 2006-01-01 | Investigation | The U.S. Attorney's office conducted an intensive investigation involving grand jury subpoenas. | N/A | View |
| 2006-01-01 | Legal event | Mr. Epstein's "Prior Arrests" occurred in Florida. | Florida | View |
| 2005-02-12 | Phone call | EVA telephoned Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Start of employment for [Redacted] with Mr. Epstein | Unknown | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Investigation | Mr. Epstein's house was searched, giving him notice that state authorities were conducting an inv... | His house | View |
| 2004-07-19 | Phone message | TATUM left a message for MR. EPSTEIN asking about taking a taxi. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000787.jpg
This legal document outlines fourteen bail conditions proposed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team. The conditions include home detention in his Manhattan residence (valued at $77 million), electronic monitoring, and a substantial bond secured by his residence, private jet, his brother Mark's home, and his friend David Mitchell's investments. The proposal aims to guarantee Epstein's court appearance and mitigate any perceived danger to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00000786.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, outlines the U.S. Government's argument against granting pretrial release to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The Government asserts he is an extraordinary flight risk due to his wealth, access to private planes, and the long potential prison sentence he faces. The document also provides background on Epstein's past legal issues, including a 2005 investigation, a 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and a 2008 guilty plea in Florida, contrasting the prosecution's view with the defense's claim that Epstein is not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000785.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against granting pretrial release (bail) to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The prosecution (The Government) contends that under federal law (§ 3142), the nature of the charges (sex trafficking of minors) creates a presumption for detention. The document further cites the Government's belief that Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community and is likely to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice if released.
DOJ-OGR-00000708.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from the case against Jeffrey Epstein. An attorney representing Epstein's victims addresses the judge, thanking the court for allowing the victims an opportunity to be heard despite the defendant being deceased. The attorney also notes that there has been a suggestion for the court to investigate the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00000690.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, where an attorney argues against an article by Professor Green that opposes victim participation in legal proceedings. The attorney contends this view is inconsistent with the Crime Victim Rights Act, especially in the context of Mr. Epstein's prosecution, and asserts that the purpose of modern criminal law is to mitigate harm to victims. The attorney also informs the court of their advice to their clients that the government must move to dismiss the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000670.jpg
This document is a transcript of an attorney speaking in court about their representation of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. The attorney explains that an initial FBI investigation was resolved through a "secret deal" that prevented over 30 victims in Florida from participating in a hearing, denying them their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The speaker emphasizes that this treatment by the criminal justice system exponentially aggravated the harm caused by Epstein's abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00000606.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 26, 2019, in which a judge orally delivers a ruling concerning Mr. Epstein. The judge denies the defense's application for pretrial release and grants the government's application for continued remand, meaning Mr. Epstein will remain in custody. The judge states that a full written opinion will follow, which will address issues such as dangerousness, risk of flight, and the proposed bail package.
DOJ-OGR-00000583.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing filed on July 24, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It features testimony from Ms. Farmer confirming Jeffrey Epstein's inappropriate conduct toward her. Subsequently, attorney Brad Edwards introduces his client, Courtney Wild, identifying her as the 'Jane Doe' in a 2008 civil lawsuit against the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act connected to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000581.jpg
This court transcript from July 24, 2019, captures a dialogue between a lawyer, Mr. Boies, and the Court. Mr. Boies describes a pattern in a case against Mr. Epstein where cooperating witnesses would cease cooperation after being contacted by Epstein or his lawyers, who would provide them with legal counsel. These events coincided with unspecified payments, leading the Court to infer they were made to silence people.
DOJ-OGR-00000577.jpg
This is page 67 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings involve a discussion regarding victims wishing to be heard, with Mr. Boies present to represent them. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg clarifies that Epstein does not concede the government's evidence and intends to mount a defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000558.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, in which a defense lawyer argues for home detention for their client, Mr. Epstein. The lawyer outlines a series of strict proposed conditions, including a visitor list limited to the legal team, removal of cell phones, and consent to monitoring and searches. To support the argument, the lawyer cites a precedent from a 20-year-old organized crime case they argued before Former Chief Judge Mark Wolf.
DOJ-OGR-00000552.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. In it, the judge (THE COURT) raises a concern based on a New York Post article suggesting Mr. Epstein was not in compliance with his sex offender registration obligations in New York. A speaker, Mr. Weinberg, responds that while he is aware of the story, Mr. Epstein has never been officially informed of any violation by New York authorities.
DOJ-OGR-00000550.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker (likely the presiding judge) reinforces the presumption of Epstein's innocence during bail discussions. The speaker also quotes a previous statement by Judge Pickholz, who expressed surprise at the prosecutor's office's actions regarding Epstein's sex offender classification, specifically debating the reduction from Level 3 to Level 1.
DOJ-OGR-00000546.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, where attorney Mr. Weinberg is defending his client, Mr. Epstein. Weinberg argues that Epstein is not an out-of-control offender or a flight risk, citing previous intensive investigations by state and federal authorities in 2005 and 2006 and the high level of publicity as reasons why any misconduct would already be known. The judge questions the basis of Weinberg's claims about his client's character.
DOJ-OGR-00000542.jpg
Transcript from a July 24, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) where Epstein's defense argues for his release. The defense claims Epstein 'disciplined himself' and cites a 14-year gap in allegations (referencing 2002 and 2005) as proof he is no longer a danger. The Judge ('The Court') challenges this position, quoting the defense's previous letter which stated any danger had 'abated' or 'evaporated.'
DOJ-OGR-00000519.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning a bail proceeding for Mr. Epstein. The speaker discusses the government's arguments for detention, citing a recent search of Epstein's home on the Upper East Side and his arrest. The key point is the government's allegation of witness tampering, supported by evidence of two large payments ($250,000 and $100,000) made to Epstein's associates shortly after a Miami Herald story was published about the case and the role of former U.S. Attorney Mr. Acosta.
DOJ-OGR-00000518.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge is addressing the legal parties in a case involving Mr. Epstein. The judge requests information on any other legal proceedings in Florida, the Virgin Islands, or New Mexico related to Epstein's sex offender status. The judge also discusses a 'cursory' and unhelpful financial summary of Epstein's assets submitted by the defense, stating an inclination to place it on the public docket and asking for arguments from both sides.
DOJ-OGR-00000502.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument against granting bail to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It highlights the lack of detailed financial disclosure, Epstein's substantial international income (at least $10 million annually), and his residences in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Paris, all of which contribute to him being a significant flight risk. The document also criticizes a vague proposal for salaried "trustees" to monitor him and notes that his New York property is already subject to a forfeiture allegation.
DOJ-OGR-00000500.jpg
This document is page 29 of a court order filed on July 18, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The Court rules Epstein's proposed bail package inadequate, primarily because the defense failed to provide audited financial statements or an affidavit from Epstein, submitting only a 'cursory' summary claiming assets of $559,120,954. The judge criticizes the defense's claim that they could not produce accurate financials quickly, calling the excuse 'disingenuous' for someone of Epstein's wealth and financial experience.
DOJ-OGR-00000495.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6M Paris residence, ownership of private jets, extensive international travel (over 20 trips in 18 months), and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals the recent seizure of a fraudulent Austrian passport in his possession, further strengthening the case against granting him bail.
DOJ-OGR-00000494.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues for the pre-trial detention of the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The prosecution asserts that the severity of the charges, which carry a maximum sentence of 45 years, creates a presumption for remand. The document outlines the strength of the evidence, including victim and witness testimony, physical evidence, and reports of witness tampering, and notes Mr. Epstein's prior felony convictions in Florida involving minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000488.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Government on July 18, 2019, alleges that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to tamper with witnesses. The Government contends that shortly after the Miami Herald published an exposé on his 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein paid $100,000 and $250,000 respectively to 'Individual I' and 'Individual II', both described as potential co-conspirators who allegedly facilitated his crimes. The payments are presented as evidence of an attempt to influence potential witnesses in his ongoing case.
DOJ-OGR-00000487.jpg
This page from a court filing details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein's associates used intimidation tactics, such as aggressive driving, against victims' parents to silence them. It also outlines 2007 plea discussions where federal prosecutors and Epstein's counsel considered charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, specifically referencing statutes 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d) and 18 U.S.C. § 403.
DOJ-OGR-00000485.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues for the detention of Mr. Epstein. It cites a Pretrial Services report that deems him a flight risk and a danger to the community, referencing his current sex trafficking charges, a 2008 conviction for prostitution-related felonies, and his status as a registered sex offender. The Government alleges Epstein is a "serial sexual predator" who created a vast network to exploit minors, and the document includes a footnote quoting Epstein distinguishing himself as an "offender" rather than a "predator."
DOJ-OGR-00000484.jpg
This legal document argues for the continued pretrial detention (remand) of Mr. Epstein. It cites legal precedents establishing a strong presumption of detention for defendants charged with certain serious offenses, arguing this presumption is not easily overcome. The document concludes by highlighting that the U.S. Pretrial Services Department, after interviewing Mr. Epstein, issued a report on July 8, 2019, recommending to the court that he remain in custody.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Epstein purchased a travel ticket for the witne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Unnamed School | $0.00 | Attorney Menninger notes that a form lists Mr. ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | The Family / The ... | $0.00 | Financial assistance/guarantor for school admis... | View |
| N/A | Received | Les | MR. EPSTEIN | $100,000,000.00 | Les Wexner theoretically owed Mr. Epstein $100 ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane Doe Number 3 | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Underage females | $200.00 | Payment for sexual massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money accepted for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots for Ms. Farmer. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane / Profession... | $0.00 | The Court notes testimony indicating Epstein wa... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Bruce Rinehart | $0.00 | Rinehart 'appeared to be being paid by Mr. Epst... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Theft of cash (band of hundred dollar bills) fr... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of boots. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Airline/Vendor | $0.00 | Purchase of a plane ticket to fly to New York. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Discussion of potential college tuition payment... | View |
| 2025-12-01 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Plaintiff (unnamed) | $0.00 | Settlement of a suit | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | THE COURT | $0.00 | Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... | View |
| 2007-05-08 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jim Eisenberg | $0.00 | Payment for attorney services for a subpoenaed ... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Unknown | MR. EPSTEIN | $0.00 | Purchase of Bell helicopter | View |
No Subject
Polina called at 7:30 AM from 1-917-612-3450. The message states, "She's in the neighborhood".
No Subject
Communicating on email (based on discovery)
A need to talk
Mr. Epstein contacted Mr. Alessi stating, "We need to talk."
Thank you for donation and construction updates
A letter thanking Mr. Epstein for his $200,000 donation for a new scholarship lodge and providing updates on construction timelines.
Details/guidance
Ghislaine Maxwell emailed Mr. Epstein for details, asking 'what do I do?'
Legal drama/press attention
Ghislaine Maxwell says she had phone calls with Mr. Epstein on occasion, especially during times of legal drama or press attention, to find out what was going on.
No Subject
Southern District of New York was in regular telephone contact with Mr. Epstein until his death.
Information on building a scholarship lodge
A letter providing Mr. Epstein with information about building a scholarship lodge on Interlochen's campus and what a donation for the project would entail.
Mr. Epstein's move from East 69th to 9 East 71st Street.
A deposition was taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office where Mr. Epstein was questioned about the timing of his move between two properties in early 1996.
Flight scheduling
Mr. Epstein would occasionally speak to Rodgers to schedule flights or let him know a flight was happening.
Visit to the lodge
Invitation to come to the lodge, discussed in context of August dates.
Missed Call
Telephoned / Please Call
Separation Agreement / NDA
Agreement requiring Alessi not to talk to anybody about Epstein's or Maxwell's lives.
Unspecified
Emails constituting 'past recollection recorded'.
Residency/Movement
Deposition excerpt regarding whether Epstein had moved.
Unknown
Message located on top left of exhibit 1C.
Phone Message
Telephoned. (No specific message text written)
Meeting Confirmation
she will see you at 7:30
Relaying message from Sophie
She said that Sophie got her messages + said that she's sorry for not seeing you in California.
Unknown
The document references a message on the upper right-hand corner of Exhibit 2T that says 'for Mr. Epstein'.
Incoming calls
Messages written in a book with carbon copies.
Travel
Discussion about going to Thailand.
Message Pads
Discussion regarding the accuracy, dating, and authorship of messages written in message pads found in exhibits.
Building a scholarship lodge
Providing information on the concept of building a scholarship lodge on Interlochen's campus and the level of donation required.
Daily reporting
As a condition of his proposed bail, Mr. Epstein would be required to report daily by telephone to Pretrial Services.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity