PBPD
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
FBI
|
Inter agency cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
PBSA
|
Cooperation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI
|
Information sharing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lanna Belohlavek
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI Florida Office
|
Investigative hand off |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional referral |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Investigative cooperation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
FBI
|
Inter agency cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Investigative jurisdictional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Investigated searched property of |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (Redacted)
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Adversarial distrust |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD PALM BEACH FL 33480
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Chain of custody |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | PBPD Search of 358 El Brillo Way | 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Police action | The PBPD executed a search warrant on Epstein's home. | Epstein's Palm Beach Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrant executed at Epstein's Palm Beach Residence. | Palm Beach Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of evidence | New York Office (NYO) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery of video surveillance equipment ('covert cameras') at Epstein's Palm Beach residence (g... | Epstein's Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | PBPD received polygraph examination results and was offered an opportunity to meet with the polyg... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness claimed defense investigators impersonated police officers to get her statement. Defense ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Execution of a search warrant by PBPD where a computer was allegedly taken. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Execution of search warrant by PBPD. | Epstein's Palm Beach Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Referral of Epstein case from PBPD to FBI | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Police investigation | The PBPD searched Epstein's home and retrieved evidence, including notepads, photographs, and mas... | Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-08 | N/A | Property Receipt / Reports Received from PBPD | Palm Beach | View |
| 2021-10-07 | N/A | Subpoena to PBPD | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-12-01 | N/A | Execution of search warrant at Epstein's home by PBPD. Note: CPUs were removed prior to search an... | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2006-11-06 | N/A | Trash Pull at 100-PAR | 100-PAR (Palm Beach) | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 29 items of property from Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence. Several items, i... | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Seizure of PBPD (Palm Beach Police Department) evidence | Florida | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Original collection/seizure of items (likely from PBPD to FBI custody or internal PBPD logging). | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | Investigation initiated after PBPD requested FBI assistance. | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2006-05-01 | N/A | Search warrant execution where police found missing equipment, suspecting Epstein was tipped off. | Epstein's Property | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Federal investigation initiated by FBI at request of PBPD. | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | PBPD referred its investigation to the FBI Florida Office. | Florida | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) opened an investigation into allegations that Epstein and h... | N/A | View |
| 2005-10-25 | N/A | PBPD executed search warrant at 358 El Brillo Way, seizing message books, photos, VHS tapes, and ... | 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Bea... | View |
EFTA00020426.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven specific issues, including the inability of Maxwell to view files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), metadata discrepancies suggesting files were created/modified after seizure, and gaps in Bates numbering. The prosecution responds by explaining technical limitations with the MDC (prison), asserting that metadata reflects the state of files upon FBI seizure or carving, and clarifying that certain images came from physical CDs seized from Epstein's residences in 2019 rather than electronic extractions.
EFTA00019092.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 regarding discovery disputes in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Defense attorney Christian Everdell outlines seven specific issues to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), including technical problems with Maxwell accessing files on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and significant metadata discrepancies where files from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation/modification dates occurring after his death and the seizure of the devices (dates in 2020). The chain concludes with USANYS contractors scheduling an internal meeting to address these production issues.
EFTA00015636.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding discovery disputes. Key issues include the logistics of providing electronic discovery to Maxwell in prison (MDC) because she cannot use disks, missing email attachments, and metadata discrepancies for thousands of files and photos recovered from Epstein's devices and residences. The prosecution explains that 'carved' or deleted files lack original metadata and that certain photos came from seized CDs rather than devices processed by the FBI's CART unit.
EFTA00015175.pdf
An email dated October 7, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to FBI agents regarding 'Palm Beach.' The email attaches a subpoena to the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) and reports concerning activities from 2001-2004. It provides contact information for a Sergeant and discusses travel logistics for agents flying out the next morning.
EFTA00008520.pdf
This document is an image of a box containing evidence, labeled with an FBI FD-340 form. The form indicates the box contains '2 boxes (PBPD records of Epstein Investigation),' referring to the Palm Beach Police Department's files on Jeffrey Epstein. The evidence was acquired by the FBI's New York Office (NYO) under file number 50D-NY-3027571, though the specific date and names of the individuals transferring the evidence are redacted.
EFTA00007747.pdf
This document set consists of evidence labels and a placeholder for a CD that was not scanned. The CD is labeled with 'PBPD Case # 05-368' and 'Prop # 05-1079', indicating it originates from the Palm Beach Police Department's 2005 investigation. The CD contains a 'Digital Voice Recording' with statements from an individual named Rodriguez and another redacted individual.
DOJ-OGR-00033215.tif
This document excerpt details two main points: findings from a MySpace webpage regarding an individual falsely claiming to be 18 years old and allegations of Juan Alessi burglarizing Epstein's home. The MySpace findings, including provocative content and claims of high earnings, were provided to the PBPD defense but not included in official reports. Juan Alessi, a former employee, was caught on tape stealing cash from Epstein's Palm Beach residence in 2003, admitted to the burglaries, and made a statement regarding Epstein's massages, though his criminal history and mental instability were also not included in official police reports.
DOJ-OGR-00033214.tif
This document excerpt details two main points: an accusation that defense investigators impersonated police officers, which was found to be baseless, and a subject's history of drug/alcohol use, running away, and association with 'unsavory individuals'. The document highlights failures by the PBPD to include exculpatory information in their reports regarding both incidents.
DOJ-OGR-00033209.tif
This document details inconsistencies and omissions in Police Reports and probable cause affidavits related to meetings between defense counsel and the State Attorney's Office concerning Epstein, and the discovery of surveillance equipment and other items at Epstein's residence. It highlights instances where information was allegedly misrepresented or omitted, such as the PBPD's failure to attend a meeting where Epstein's psycho-sexual evaluation was presented, and the characterization of items found in Epstein's home.
DOJ-OGR-00023306.tif
This document, an excerpt from a legal report, discusses the handling of victim notification in the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically focusing on the roles of Sloman, Villafaña, and PBPD Chief Reiter, and the subsequent review of prosecutor Acosta's actions by OPR. It analyzes whether federal victim notification laws (CVRA/VRRA) applied to state court proceedings and concludes that Acosta's deferral of victim notification to the State Attorney's Office did not constitute professional misconduct. Legal citations and quotes from individuals involved are provided to support the analysis.
DOJ-OGR-00023297.tif
This document excerpt details discussions among USAO personnel regarding victim notification and consultation prior to the signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) on September 24, 2007. Key individuals like Villafaña, Sloman, Acosta, and Menchel debated the necessity of victim involvement, with some believing it was not required or that disclosures would be confidential, while concerns were raised about victims seeking damages from Epstein. The text highlights differing interpretations of CVRA obligations and internal communications leading up to the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00023273.tif
This document details events surrounding Epstein's state plea, focusing on victim notification failures and the actions of various legal and investigative parties. It highlights Villafaña's efforts to identify victims and contact their attorneys, and statements from victims (Wild, Jane Doe #2) expressing their lack of awareness regarding the plea's implications for their cases. The document also notes discrepancies in the State Attorney's Office's communication about the case closure and Epstein's sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00023245.tif
This document details communications and events in September-October 2007 concerning the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and informing victims. Key figures like Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, and Lourie discuss preventing the NPA from becoming public, managing information disclosure to victims, and coordinating legal representation for the victims to recover damages from Epstein. There is a clear effort to control the narrative and information flow regarding the NPA and its implications for the victims.
DOJ-OGR-00023236.tif
This document excerpt details the victim notification processes during the Epstein investigation, specifically focusing on the actions of an individual named Villafaña and the FBI. It highlights discrepancies and lack of uniformity in victim notification, with Villafaña preparing her own introductory letters to victims while the FBI also sent letters, often without Villafaña's direct knowledge or review, prior to Epstein's guilty plea in 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00023218.tif
This document excerpt discusses the internal deliberations and negotiations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's potential sentencing and plea options. It highlights differing recollections among officials like Acosta, Lourie, Menchel, and Sloman regarding how a two-year sentence proposal was reached, and details various charging alternatives considered by the USAO, including a plea to a federal offense with a harsher sentence or a conspiracy charge. The document also notes Epstein's team's consistent push for less or no jail time and the USAO's consideration of federal sentencing guidelines and judicial approval for plea deals.
DOJ-OGR-00023210.tif
This document analyzes R. Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein prosecution, critiquing his use and interpretation of the Petite policy. It details Acosta's reasoning for federal non-intervention, his view on the state's role, and his concessions during an OPR interview that the outcome was not an appropriate punishment. The text also references the Ashcroft Memo and mentions an estimated sentencing range for Epstein by Villafaña.
DOJ-OGR-00021478.jpg
This legal document details the conflicting accounts between federal prosecutor Villafaña and victims' attorney Edwards concerning the notification for Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008 state court guilty plea. Villafaña claims she encouraged Edwards to attend but was limited in what she could disclose, while Edwards claims he was misled about the plea's scope and its impact on federal prosecution possibilities under the NPA. The document also reveals internal government discussions about the method of victim notification, ultimately delegating the task to the Palm Beach Police Department.
DOJ-OGR-00021472.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report detailing the failure of the USAO (specifically Acosta, Villafaña, and Sloman) to coordinate with the State Attorney's Office regarding victim notification for Jeffrey Epstein's June 2008 plea hearing. It reveals that despite a draft letter in December 2007 intended to provide a list of victims to the state, no evidence exists that the letter was sent, leaving state prosecutors (Krischer and Belohlavek) unaware of the federal identified victims. A footnote highlights that Epstein's attorneys explicitly asked the USAO not to inform victims of their rights under state charges.
DOJ-OGR-00021461.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal decision-making process regarding victim notification prior to signing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein in September 2007. It highlights conflicts where prosecutor Villafaña raised concerns about the legal requirement to consult victims, but was overruled by supervisors Sloman, Menchel, and Acosta, who cited confidentiality of plea negotiations and a belief that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) did not apply to pre-charge resolutions. The document also notes Menchel's concern that notifying victims might cause them to exaggerate stories to seek financial damages.
DOJ-OGR-00021434.jpg
This legal document details conflicting accounts regarding the notification of victims for Jeffrey Epstein's June 30, 2008, state plea hearing. It focuses on communications between prosecutor Villafaña, investigator Reiter, and victim's attorney Edwards, particularly concerning a list of victims that was created and subsequently destroyed. The document highlights discrepancies in recollections from various depositions and declarations about what information was shared and with whom, forming a key part of the CVRA litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00021433.jpg
This document outlines the internal DOJ communications in June 2008 regarding the finalization of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and the handling of victim notifications. It details how prosecutor Villafaña was instructed by superiors Alex Acosta and Jeff Sloman to avoid direct victim notification, instead delegating that task to PBPD Chief Reiter. The text also confirms that the Deputy Attorney General had deemed federal prosecution appropriate just days before the plea deal deadline.
DOJ-OGR-00021428.jpg
This document details events in April and May 2008 concerning the federal investigation into Epstein, highlighting prosecutors' frustration with delays caused by the defense's appeal to the Department's Criminal Division. It captures communications showing officials, including Acosta, Villafaña, and Sloman, were concerned about victims losing patience and were contemplating filing charges. Concurrently, it describes a separate legal discussion where USAO supervisors, prompted by an unrelated complaint, affirmed their position that victims' rights under the CVRA are only triggered once formal charges are filed.
DOJ-OGR-00021427.jpg
This legal document details the actions of prosecutor Villafaña between February and April 2008 regarding the case against Epstein. Villafaña actively revised the prosecution strategy, sought pro bono legal counsel to protect victims from harassment by Epstein's defense team, and urged her supervisors for a swift resolution, highlighting the severe emotional toll on the victims. The document also includes Villafaña's justification to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for her statements to victims about the ongoing nature of the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00021407.jpg
This document details communications from September 2007 concerning a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Case Agent Villafaña, prosecutors Acosta and Lourie, and defense attorney Lefkowitz discussed how to handle the NPA's disclosure, with a focus on preventing it from becoming public while navigating legal requirements and informing victims. Villafaña also attempted to coordinate the appointment of an attorney representative for the victims and sought guidance on what information could be shared with them and other agents.
DOJ-OGR-00021404.jpg
This legal document details a factual dispute investigated by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) concerning the Epstein case. Prosecutor Villafaña claimed her supervisors—Acosta, Sloman, and Menchel—instructed her not to consult with victims about plea negotiations, an instruction they all deny recalling. The document outlines the conflicting testimonies and notes that while OPR could not definitively resolve the disagreement, it found no documentary evidence to support Villafaña's claim of a specific meeting or instruction on this matter.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity