| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
L.M.
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Wild
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Wild
|
Representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Professional later |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards' clients
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Litigation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe No. 1 & 2
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mazzuca
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Former professional connection |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Three Victims
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
minor girls
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Delivery of the sermon 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' to the Enfield congregation. | Enfield | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of Florida Bar complaint against Edwards. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards filed a Motion for Contempt regarding the false information about Brunel. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of CVRA petition by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of three cases filed by Edwards against Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Unfounded filing of claims against Edwards by Epstein. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of civil complaints by Edwards for three clients. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery efforts to obtain photographic materials regarding Jane Doe No. 3 held by federal agenc... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards' Summary Judgment hearing (Epstein dismissed case morning of). | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal action | Villafaña informed Edwards about Epstein's state plea but did not mention the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil lawsuits filed against Epstein by Edwards and others. | Florida (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of complaint by Epstein | Florida Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein refused to answer basic discovery questions regarding the lawsuit. | Legal Discovery Proceedings | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Edwards filed a CVRA petition after learning of the state plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | In-camera disclosure of settlement amounts. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Discovery/Depositions | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cases filed by Edwards against Epstein | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of CVRA action and subsequent Motion to reopen. | S.D. Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of previous lawsuits | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Second Amended Complaint | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Motion for Summary Judgment | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery/Depositions pursued by Edwards | Litigation process | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of RICO claim | Federal Court | View |
This document is a printout of a news article (likely from the Miami Herald) discussing legal maneuvers to reopen the criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and throw out his 2008 plea agreement. It covers the involvement of victims' attorneys requesting a review by a new jurisdiction (Pak's office), a DOJ probe into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta's conduct during the original case, and an upcoming hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents requested by the Miami Herald. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number.
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article discussing the legal fallout and investigations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It details a DOJ investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the plea deal, initiated by members of Congress including Ben Sasse and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The article also mentions a letter to the New York Times from Epstein's legal team (including Kenneth Starr) defending the original deal, and an upcoming court hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents related to Epstein's crimes.
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article by Emily Michot regarding the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It details Judge Marra's ruling that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by misleading victims and sealing the non-prosecution agreement negotiated by Alex Acosta. The text highlights that Epstein worked with others to procure minors and that victims' attorneys are petitioning the DOJ to reopen the investigation.
This document contains pages 80 and 281 from the book 'Filthy Rich', submitted as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. Page 281 details Sarah Kellen's activities in 2009, including renting a Palm Beach bungalow under the alias 'Clara' for $4,000/month and taking a round-the-world trip. It also discusses the non-prosecution agreement, noting that prosecutors considered charging Kellen, Wendy Dobbs, and Nadia Marcinkova, but Epstein's plea deal protected them, with the narrative suggesting Epstein could have pleaded to assaulting Kellen on his jet to avoid sex crime charges.
This document appears to be a page from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich,' stamped as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details the contentious legal battle between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney [Brad] Edwards, describing Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards as a desperate attempt by a 'serial pedophile' to silence victims' advocates. It also discusses Sarah Kellen using the alias 'Clara' to rent property in Palm Beach in April 2009 and mentions prosecutors considering Kellen and Marcinkova as potential co-conspirators.
This document is a scanned book excerpt (page 272), stamped by House Oversight, detailing events surrounding Alan Dershowitz. It describes a 2015 speech he gave at Johns Hopkins University that was protested by a feminist group labeling him part of 'rape culture' due to his defense of Jeffrey Epstein. The text also references 2016 legal settlements involving Dershowitz and attorneys Edwards and Cassell, as well as a mention of a plot to blackmail 'Les W' (likely Les Wexner).
This document consists of two pages (258-259) from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely by James Patterson), reproduced in a House Oversight file. It contains a transcript of a Q&A, likely a deposition. The text discusses a potential witness who is friends with Virginia Roberts and allegations that lawyers Edwards and Paul Cassell acted unethically or pressured someone. The deponent describes making phone calls from New York to a man to request a conversation with his wife, Rebecca.
This document consists of pages 242-243 from the book 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the legal conflict between Virginia Roberts (and her lawyers Edwards and Cassell) and Alan Dershowitz, who vehemently denies Roberts' sexual abuse allegations, calling them an extortion plot and threatening her lawyers with disbarment. The text also references Prince Andrew (Duke of York) issuing a denial regarding allegations of sexual contact with minors, and mentions Epstein using 'Trump's resort' for recruitment.
This document is an excerpt from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich'), marked as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, Leslie Wexner, and French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel. The text describes how Epstein used his connection to Wexner (Victoria's Secret) and his financial backing of Brunel's agencies (Karin, MC2) to access models, with allegations of visa manipulation and exploitation of young women from former Soviet republics.
This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as House Oversight evidence) discussing the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, Leslie Wexner, and French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel around 2005. It details how Epstein leveraged his connection to Wexner (Victoria's Secret) and his financial backing of Brunel's agencies (Karin, MC2) to access models, noting Brunel's history of alleged sexual exploitation dating back to a 1988 '60 Minutes' investigation. The text highlights Brunel scouting in former Soviet republics and Epstein paying for models' support and housing.
This document is a 'Counsel List' page from a legal filing in the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It details the contact information (addresses, phone numbers, emails) for attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein, including Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg, and Joseph Ackerman, as well as Marc Nurik representing Scott Rothstein. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
A page from a Miami Herald article (part of a court filing) discussing the private investigation efforts by lawyers representing Jeffrey Epstein's victims. It highlights a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell in 2015, which resulted in a confidential but 'sizable' settlement in 2017. The text criticizes federal authorities in New York for failing to open new investigations despite evidence provided by private investigators.
This document is an excerpt from a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, primarily from Virginia Roberts' affidavit. It covers alleged sexual encounters, denials from those accused, legal actions including defamation lawsuits and settlements, and a brief mention of Epstein's sentencing hearing. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the allegations and the legal aftermath.
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit in 2019. It details Virginia Roberts' (Giuffre) recollections of 2007, including intimidating calls from Epstein and Maxwell, and her skepticism regarding FBI agents Slater and Kuyrkendall, whom she feared were Epstein associates. The text also covers her 2011 public accusations against Prince Andrew and her 2015 affidavit implicating Andrew and Alan Dershowitz.
This document is a court exhibit containing a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Alan Dershowitz by Sarah Ransome and Virginia Roberts regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. It discusses a defamation settlement where Dershowitz paid $900,000 to Roberts' lawyers, despite his claims of vindication and an exonerating investigation by Louis Freeh. The text also references sealed emails and court motions to make these documents public.
A Miami Herald article (filed as a court exhibit in 2019) discussing the efforts of victims' lawyers to investigate Jeffrey Epstein when prosecutors would not. It highlights Virginia Roberts' defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell, which alleged they operated an international sex trafficking ring, noting the suit was settled in 2017. The document features a photograph of Virginia Roberts holding a picture of her younger self.
Affidavit of David S. Stone in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Alan Dershowitz, filed April 16, 2019. Stone details his professional relationships with both Dershowitz and David Boies and describes facilitating meetings between them in May 2015 regarding sexual abuse allegations against Dershowitz. Stone explicitly refutes Dershowitz's claim that Boies stated during a May 19th meeting that Giuffre (referred to as Roberts) was 'mistaken' about the abuse.
This document page details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein violated judicial no-contact orders by hiring a private investigator to harass and intimidate a witness ('Jane Doe') prior to a scheduled civil trial in July 2010. It describes a specific incident where an investigator stalked Jane Doe and flashed lights into her home, forcing her to be moved to a secure location by a retired police officer. It also notes that attorney Edwards filed civil cases on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe regarding sexual abuse of children.
This document, likely a page from a House Oversight report, details the legal strategies employed by attorney Edwards against Jeffrey Epstein, specifically the use of flight logs to prove a federal nexus for sexual crimes. It discusses a complaint by 'Jane Doe No. 102' alleging the use of Epstein's plane for transporting minors as young as 12 for abuse by Epstein and his friends. Additionally, it references a Fall 2009 interview with the New York Daily News where Epstein denied wrongdoing and claimed civil suits were result of jealousy over his success.
This document is a page from a legal filing involving Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Edwards. It details disputes over the depositions of Tommy Mattola, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson. The text alleges Copperfield was a frequent guest at Epstein's home and was accused of improper sexual touching by one of Epstein's victims, while Richardson is linked to visits at Epstein's New Mexico ranch where young girls were present.
This document is a page from a legal filing detailing the contentious discovery process in cases against Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how Epstein's attorneys aggressively questioned victims and how attorney Edwards sought to depose Bill Clinton based on his connections to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text outlines specific allegations against Maxwell regarding the procurement and abuse of minors and mentions Clinton's travel with Epstein to Africa.
This document is a legal filing (page 24) detailing attorney Edwards' attempts to depose Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that Epstein paid her legal fees. It highlights Maxwell's evasion of a 2010 deposition by claiming to flee the country for a sick relative, only to be photographed at Chelsea Clinton's wedding a month later. It also cites a 2005 message from Jean Luc Brunel to Epstein offering a '2x8 years old' Russian 'teacher' for 'lessons,' implying sex trafficking.
This document describes Jeffrey Epstein's obstruction of the discovery process in civil lawsuits filed by attorney Edwards. It details how Epstein utilized the 5th Amendment to refuse answering substantive questions regarding the sexual abuse of minors during at least five depositions. A specific transcript excerpt from March 8, 2010, is included where Epstein refuses to answer Mr. Horowitz regarding an assault on Jane Doe 3 and makes false accusations about attorney Jeffrey Herman.
This page from a legal filing details allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on 'Jane Doe 102,' who was lured at age 15 and forced into sex slavery involving politicians, businessmen, and royalty. It mentions a disturbing incident where the victim watched Epstein with three 12-year-old French girls sent to him as a birthday gift by a friend. The document also notes that Epstein paid settlements to over 15 women to avoid civil suits.
This document, page 17 of a legal filing marked with House Oversight bates stamps, details the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It outlines his guilty plea to state charges in Palm Beach County on June 30, 2008, and the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal Government that shielded him from federal charges while acknowledging potential compensation for approximately 34 victims. The text also references an attorney named Edwards filing a motion regarding a CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) action and a victim (Jane Doe) appearing on television to criticize the leniency of the plea.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
Notice of intent to take deposition.
Legal notice
For malicious prosecution.
Details harassment events in Jane Doe v. Epstein
Notices regarding depositions of Mattola and Copperfield.
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Villafaña spoke to Edwards but did not inform him specifically of the signed NPA.
Edwards did not respond to OPR's request to interview him.
Standard discovery requests regarding sexual abuse of minor girls.
Villafaña told Edwards the hearing was 'important' but did not disclose the global resolution.
Comments on fresh eyes reviewing the case and adversarial posture with Miami office
Edwards shared 'information and concerns' and asked 'very specific questions about what stage the investigation was in'. Villafaña responded she could not answer and gave the impression of an 'on-going active investigation'.
Informed Edwards that Maxwell's mother was deathly ill and she was flying to England.
Informed Edwards that Maxwell's mother was deathly ill and Maxwell was flying to England with no intention of returning to the US.
Request to delay Brunel's deposition date.
Claimed Brunel had left the country and was back in France with no plans to return (later proven false).
Informed Edwards about state plea but omitted NPA details.
In mid-June 2008, Edwards contacted Villafaña on Wild's behalf and was told the case was under investigation, with no mention of the NPA.
Villafaña spoke to Edwards on the telephone but did not inform him specifically of the signed NPA.
First filing of complaints containing allegations against Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity