| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
L.M.
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Wild
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Wild
|
Representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Professional later |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards' clients
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Litigation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe No. 1 & 2
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mazzuca
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Former professional connection |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Three Victims
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
minor girls
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Delivery of the sermon 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' to the Enfield congregation. | Enfield | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of Florida Bar complaint against Edwards. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards filed a Motion for Contempt regarding the false information about Brunel. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of CVRA petition by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of three cases filed by Edwards against Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Unfounded filing of claims against Edwards by Epstein. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of civil complaints by Edwards for three clients. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery efforts to obtain photographic materials regarding Jane Doe No. 3 held by federal agenc... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards' Summary Judgment hearing (Epstein dismissed case morning of). | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal action | Villafaña informed Edwards about Epstein's state plea but did not mention the NPA. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil lawsuits filed against Epstein by Edwards and others. | Florida (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of complaint by Epstein | Florida Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein refused to answer basic discovery questions regarding the lawsuit. | Legal Discovery Proceedings | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Edwards filed a CVRA petition after learning of the state plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | In-camera disclosure of settlement amounts. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Discovery/Depositions | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cases filed by Edwards against Epstein | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of CVRA action and subsequent Motion to reopen. | S.D. Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of previous lawsuits | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Second Amended Complaint | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Motion for Summary Judgment | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discovery/Depositions pursued by Edwards | Litigation process | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of RICO claim | Federal Court | View |
This document appears to be page 106 of an academic or theological text discussing anthropomorphism in religion, specifically analyzing Jonathan Edwards's sermon 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God' and the philosophy of Hugo Grotius. While the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021352' indicates it is part of a government document production (likely related to an investigation), the page content itself is purely literary/theological analysis and contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or financial transactions on this specific page.
This document appears to be a single page (Page 105) from an academic book or paper discussing the psychological mechanisms of anthropomorphism, referencing scholars like Tanya Luhrmann and theological concepts. It distinguishes between 'weak' and 'strong' anthropomorphism using examples of pet ownership and nature. While the document contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file (possibly related to the Epstein investigation), the text itself is theoretical and contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or specific criminal activities.
This document is page 4 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, from the law firm SDBS to Thomas E. Scott, Jr., regarding the case *Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz*. The letter aggressively challenges the defense's discovery responses, accusing them of 'word play and gamesmanship' regarding document production, metadata, and definitions. The sender demands immediate production of documents and rejects the defense's attempts to limit discovery to a narrow timeframe, arguing that Dershowitz's alleged defamation and public denials were broad and unrestricted by time.
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, addressed to Thomas E. Scott, Jr. regarding the case *Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz*. The text outlines legal arguments concerning discovery abuses, specifically arguing that one cannot claim privilege or undue burden for documents that do not exist, and providing a broad legal definition of 'control' over documents to include those held by third parties like attorneys or accountants. The document was entered on the FLSD Docket on March 24, 2015, and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A. to attorney Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr. regarding the case 'Edwards and Cassell vs. Dershowitz.' The letter addresses discovery disputes, specifically criticizing the recipient's use of 'general objections' and 'subject to' responses as improper tactics that shield information from discovery. It cites federal court precedents disapproving of such objections.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Edwards | Epstein | $0.00 | Epstein is attempting to force Edwards to pay '... | View |
For malicious prosecution.
Standard discovery requests regarding sexual abuse of minor girls.
Villafaña spoke to Edwards but did not inform him specifically of the signed NPA.
Details harassment events in Jane Doe v. Epstein
Notices regarding depositions of Mattola and Copperfield.
Allegations that Edwards 'should have known' about the Ponzi scheme.
Edwards did not respond to OPR's request to interview him.
Villafaña told Edwards the hearing was 'important' but did not disclose the global resolution.
Legal notice
Notice of intent to take deposition.
Comments on fresh eyes reviewing the case and adversarial posture with Miami office
Edwards shared 'information and concerns' and asked 'very specific questions about what stage the investigation was in'. Villafaña responded she could not answer and gave the impression of an 'on-going active investigation'.
Informed Edwards that Maxwell's mother was deathly ill and Maxwell was flying to England with no intention of returning to the US.
Informed Edwards that Maxwell's mother was deathly ill and she was flying to England.
Claimed Brunel had left the country and was back in France with no plans to return (later proven false).
Request to delay Brunel's deposition date.
Informed Edwards about state plea but omitted NPA details.
In mid-June 2008, Edwards contacted Villafaña on Wild's behalf and was told the case was under investigation, with no mention of the NPA.
Villafaña spoke to Edwards on the telephone but did not inform him specifically of the signed NPA.
First filing of complaints containing allegations against Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity