BRAD EDWARDS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Courtney Wild
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Three young women
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AK
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witnesses who testified
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Several young women (victims)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Previous communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 1
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting where Kate asked the Government to look into sponsoring her for a U-Visa. Brad Edwards ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a lawsuit against the affiant, Brad Edwards, and Scott Rothstein alleging conspirac... | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | Proffer session | Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal consultation | Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards to report the abuse she suffered. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial that the author indicates might not have happened without her attorneys. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Fundraisers and parties at witness's home | Witness's Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Start of Brad Edwards' investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Win/Settlement with Deutsche Bank | Legal Court/Settlement | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting and Contacts with Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, and Brad Edwards by AUSA [REDACTED]. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Florida Defamation Action (Case No. CACE 15-000072). | Broward County Circuit Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit brought by Epstein against Brad Edwards. | Florida | View |
| 2025-10-01 | N/A | Brad Edwards called the FBI. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's second deposition. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition where he mentioned handwritten notes/journal. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Brad Edwards had access to 'the list'. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Discussion regarding trial order and witness testimony logistics. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Plea Hearing | SDNY Court | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | FBI received a USB drive containing photographs from Brad Edwards. | New York Office | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation dated by counsel | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Filing of Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule | New York, New York | View |
EFTA00021332.pdf
An email chain from August to October 2019 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. Scarola introduces a victim who was molested by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida starting at age 14 and received lingerie gifts from him. The prosecutors express strong interest in interviewing the victim and offer to travel to Florida to do so, following up multiple times to arrange the meeting.
EFTA00021331.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 10, 2019, involving attorneys from Edwards Pottinger LLC (Brittany Henderson and Brad Edwards). The discussion concerns scheduling interviews for four victims related to the Epstein case, set for October 23 and 24, 2019. Specific scheduling preferences and travel concerns for the redacted victims are mentioned.
EFTA00021033.pdf
An email dated November 23, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson. The email transmits an attachment containing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash her Rule 17(c) subpoena.
EFTA00021032.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson. The correspondence involves the transmission of legal documents related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case, specifically regarding Rule 17(c) subpoenas and a court order on motions to quash them. The sender's identity is redacted, but the signature block confirms their role within the SDNY.
EFTA00020762.pdf
This document is a declaration by a Jane Doe victim executed in January 2015, detailing her abuse by Jeffrey Epstein between 2002 and 2005 in Palm Beach. She describes being paid for sex and recruitment, being intimidated into silence through fear of losing her son, and initially using an attorney provided by Epstein to give favorable statements. The declaration outlines her transition to cooperating with prosecutors after hiring Brad Edwards in 2008, her exclusion from the plea deal process, and her realization that Epstein received lenient treatment due to his wealth and power.
EFTA00019747.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between attorneys at Edwards Pottinger LLC (Brittany Henderson and Brad Edwards) and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. They are coordinating scheduling for 'Epstein Client Meetings' which are explicitly identified as 'victim interviews' to take place on October 23 and 24, 2019, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrew's Plaza. The specific names of the victims being interviewed are redacted.
EFTA00019565.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
EFTA00018647.pdf
This document is an email chain between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the FBI's Litigation Support Unit regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence, spanning from January 2019 to October 2020, focuses on discovery materials, specifically the processing of CDs and media files found in boxes from Florida. The document includes a specific report on technical difficulties accessing 48 audio files from 2006 Grand Jury testimony and lists other media including a 2007 FBI interview and a 2010 deposition of Jeffrey Epstein provided by attorney Brad Edwards.
EFTA00017905.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 30, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns an appeal filed in the 11th Circuit regarding the Epstein CVRA case, specifically addressing allegations that victims were unable to attend the SDNY hearing due to insufficient notice. The emails detail that 39 victim notices were sent via VNS, 17 victims attended the hearing personally, and 7 had statements read in their absence; one specific anecdote describes a victim who missed two arranged flights and failed to attend.
EFTA00014652.pdf
An email from attorney Brad Edwards to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) dated November 20, 2021. Edwards acknowledges a court Order and inquires about the next steps regarding a female witness ('her'), specifically concerning her travel and the scope of her potential testimony for an upcoming trial (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the date and context).
EFTA00014477.pdf
An email chain from July 16, 2019, containing a media inquiry from a Senior Reporter at The Daily Beast. The reporter asks an unidentified official (implied SDNY) for comment regarding new allegations that Jeffrey Epstein abused a young woman during his 2008-09 work release in Florida. The internal forwarding email indicates the recipients intend to decline commenting on the inquiry.
EFTA00014178.pdf
Letter from attorney Roy Black to an Assistant US Attorney regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Black confirms Epstein's employment location and discusses a newly filed civil RICO lawsuit against Scott Rothstein and Brad Edwards, alleging they used litigation against Epstein to fuel a Ponzi scheme. Black specifically notes that Rothstein sought Epstein's flight logs to 'fish for celebrities to extort' and requests a meeting with the AUSA to discuss Epstein's progress.
EFTA00014177.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 9, 2009, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) in West Palm Beach. The AUSA forwards an email received from attorney Roy Black regarding Jeffrey Epstein to colleagues, noting it is unusual that Black contacted them directly rather than a superior named 'Jeff'. The AUSA also mentions receiving a voicemail from attorney Brad Edwards and references a complaint against the 'Rothstein firm'.
EFTA00014150.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 5, 2008, between attorneys Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, and redacted parties. The correspondence discusses Brad Edwards filing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the 'Jane Does v USA' case under seal and subsequently requesting it be unsealed. The sender also thanks Roy Black for a meeting that occurred the previous day.
EFTA00014133.pdf
An email exchange between Paul Cassell (representing victims) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the wording of a protective order. The order concerns the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to the victims. Cassell urges speed, citing government representations that 'Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement,' and negotiates the timing of when victims must sign acknowledgments of the protective order.
EFTA00014125.pdf
This document is a letter dated August 1, 2008, from attorney Brad Edwards to an Assistant US Attorney regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards argues for the inclusion of specific facts in a court notice, specifically that a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) barring federal charges was negotiated in secret in 2007 and withheld from victims due to a confidentiality clause until after Epstein's state plea in June 2008. Edwards also demands a full copy of the NPA, FBI interview reports of his clients, and a hearing transcript.
EFTA00014116.pdf
An email chain from August 2008 between Alex Acosta and USAFLS staff discussing a letter from victims' attorney Brad Edwards. The emails reveal the prosecution's internal justification for not consulting victims before the plea deal, stating they did not believe the Crime Victims Rights Act applied and feared compromising them as witnesses. Acosta explicitly notes Epstein's argument that the victims were motivated by money.
EFTA00014077.pdf
This document is the Government's response to a victim's emergency petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The Government argues that because no federal charges were filed against Epstein (no 'court proceeding'), the CVRA rights did not fully attach in the way the petitioner claims. The document details the timeline of the 2006-2008 investigation, the negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the Government's 'best efforts' to notify victims' counsel (Brad Edwards) of the state plea hearing on June 27, 2008. It defends the secrecy of the negotiations as necessary to prevent Epstein from impeaching victim witnesses and to secure a provision allowing victims to sue under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
EFTA00014067.pdf
Email correspondence from August 15, 2008, between attorney Brad Edwards and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS). They are negotiating the terms of a protective order required to disclose the non-prosecution agreement to Edwards' clients, identified as Jane Does 1 and 2. Edwards objects to a specific clause requiring his clients to formally acknowledge receipt, arguing it causes unnecessary delay.
EFTA00014028.pdf
This document contains an email thread from December 29, 2008, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS), and a forwarded email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to several lawyers representing victims (Josefsberg, Edwards, Ezell, etc.). The primary subject is the confidentiality of victim locations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's GPS monitoring 'exclusionary zones.' The Assistant U.S. Attorney confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that victim addresses added to the GPS system will remain confidential and will not be shared with Epstein.
EFTA00014026.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2008 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney and several defense attorneys (Josefsberg, Ezell, Edwards, etc.) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release conditions. The discussion focuses on the 'exclusionary zones' programmed into Epstein's GPS monitoring system to protect victims. The AUSA confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that while Epstein's GPS will alert if he nears a prohibited location, the specific addresses and identities of the victims will remain confidential and unknown to Epstein.
EFTA00013976.pdf
This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.
EFTA00013926.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by attorneys for victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) in the Jeffrey Epstein case, arguing that the U.S. Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The filing details how the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI secretly entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein in September 2007 while misleading victims for months that the investigation was ongoing and that federal charges were still possible. The motion requests the court to order the government to produce the full Non-Prosecution Agreement and FBI interview reports, and to schedule a hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00013871.pdf
An email chain from June 19, 2008, between the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The chain begins with attorney Brad Edwards offering to share information and meet with prosecutors. The government officials discuss Edwards' credibility, coordinate a meeting time, and discuss the status of the investigation, including waiting for a 'green light' from Washington D.C. and pressure from the Deputy Attorney General's office for an answer by Friday. They also mention interactions with defense attorney Roy Black.
EFTA00013595.pdf
This document contains correspondence from attorney Brad Edwards to the U.S. Attorney's Office in July 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards disputes the government's proposed stipulation of facts, specifically regarding when victims were notified of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and asserts that he and his clients were kept in the dark about the NPA while urging federal charges. The attached July 3rd letter formally requests federal prosecution, characterizing Epstein as a prolific predator who abused over 100 girls, arguing that the state plea deal was grossly inadequate.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Firm/Ponzi Scheme | BRAD EDWARDS | $0.00 | Potential bonuses discussed regarding work on c... | View |
Proposed Stipulated Facts for In Re Jane Doe
Discusses stipulation of facts, requests plea agreement copies, disputes government narrative regarding victim notification.
Proposed Undisputed Facts
Government's proposed set of stipulated facts.
Notification of Identified Victim (S.R.)
Notifying attorney that client S.R. is an identified victim under the non-prosecution agreement terms.
Notification of Identified Victim
Informing counsel that client is identified as a victim for NPA purposes
Victim Notification
Referenced letter regarding notification to Jane Doe #1.
Notification of Identified Victim (C.W.)
Notifying attorney that client C.W. is an identified victim under the non-prosecution agreement terms.
Service of Petition
Service of the Victim's Petition via US Mail and Facsimile.
Request for Prosecution
Urging vigorous enforcement of federal laws and indictment of Epstein.
Urging Prosecution
Urged vigorous enforcement of federal laws against Epstein.
Federal Prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
Urges federal indictment of Epstein, citing abuse of >100 girls and inadequacy of state plea.
Plea Hearing Notification
Notifying counsel that the state plea hearing was scheduled for Monday, June 30, 2008.
Jeff Epstein
Edwards requests a meeting to share information and concerns. States he will be in the area meeting a client next week.
Representation of Jane Doe #1 and #2
Edwards informed AUSA of representation and asked to provide info for federal charges; was not told of existing NPA.
Representation
Edwards informed AUSA he represented victims; discussed potential federal charges; AUSA did not disclose NPA.
Representation
Called to hire him to get prosecutors to hear the truth.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity