| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Gainfort Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Sarah K. Eddy
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Maurene Ryan Comey
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USA
|
Prosecutor government |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
USA/Government
|
Prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USA (Government)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Gainfort Moe
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney’s Office, SDNY
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Opposing counsel adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Maurene Ryan Comey
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S. Attorney’s office
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USA
|
Prosecutor representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | The Government conferred in good faith with counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, regardi... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-10 | N/A | Status Conference | Courtroom 110, 40 Centre St... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A court hearing for appearances of counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-01-12 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 1-2 in Case 21-58. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-12 | N/A | Electronic delivery of court notice for Case 21-58 (related to criminal case 1:20-cr-00330). | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Legal filing | Document 41 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA regarding Discovery Disclosure and Access. | District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Legal filing | LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA (Alex Rossmiller) regarding discovery. | District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-10 | Meeting | Defense counsel conferred with Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding a disclosure request. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | AFFIDAVIT of Alex Rossmiller filed by USA. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | An affidavit by Alex Rossmiller was filed. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | LETTER RESPONSE to Motion filed by USA (Alex Rossmiller) regarding the Proposed Protective Order. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Legal filing | Filing of an Affidavit of Certification by Alex Rossmiller in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Legal filing | The U.S. Attorney's office filed a document arguing against a defendant's motion and in favor of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Legal filing | This document (Document 34) was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | A letter response to the motion on the Proposed Protective Order was filed by Alex Rossmiller for... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-27 | Legal filing | A court document was filed and ordered, showing agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office and ... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-07-27 | Legal filing | The Government filed this letter requesting an opportunity to respond to the defense's motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Court proceeding | Arraignment for Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant entered a plea of Not Guilty. Bail was denied and de... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Court proceeding | Arraignment held for Ghislaine Maxwell. She pleaded not guilty, bail was denied, and she was rema... | Court (via video conference... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Ghislaine Maxwell was arraigned, pleaded Not Guilty to counts 1s-6s. Bail was denied, she was rem... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Arraignment held for Ghislaine Maxwell. She entered a plea of Not Guilty. Bail was denied, she wa... | S.D.N.Y. (via video confere... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Arraignment. Defendant entered plea of Not Guilty. Trial set for July 12, 2021. | Video Conference / Telephone | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Arraignment for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1s,2s,3s,4s,5s-6s. She entered a plea of Not Guilty. ... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Arraignment: Defendant enters plea of Not Guilty to S1 indictment. | Video Conference | View |
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020. It lists various filings including letters, motions, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery, protective orders, and conditions of confinement, as well as a Notice of Appeal filed by Maxwell. The entries document the denial of certain motions by the defendant and the scheduling of future disclosures and status updates.
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between July 30, 2020, and August 18, 2020. It includes a detailed ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders and privacy of witnesses, citing it as 'unprecedented' and 'too broad.' The docket entries list various filings, including motions for discovery disclosure by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition responses from the Government (Alex Rossmiller).
This document is a court docket sheet from late July 2020 detailing filings in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records a dispute regarding a protective order, where the defense sought to allow Maxwell to publicly name victims who had already spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict Maxwell from disseminating the identities of alleged victims or witnesses to protect their privacy.
This document is a docket sheet from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court activities from July 13 to July 27, 2020. Key events include her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the court's decision to grant the government's motion to detain her pending trial, the setting of discovery deadlines, and various motions and orders related to attorney appearances and extrajudicial statements. The document outlines the initial procedural steps in the case following her arrest.
This is a page from the docket of a court case involving the USA and defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from August 20, 2020, to September 8, 2020. It lists various legal actions including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding protective orders and redactions, and two Memorandum Opinions and Orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying certain requests by the defendant. The document also notes a Notice of Appeal filed by Maxwell regarding one of the Memorandum Opinions.
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from July 30, 2020, to August 18, 2020. It details legal arguments regarding a protective order for discovery materials, specifically concerning witness privacy and the defense's ability to reference individuals. The log tracks the filing of motions, affidavits, and responses by defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the government (Rossmiller), as well as orders issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
This is a court docket log from the Ghislaine Maxwell case covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the dispute and subsequent ruling on a Protective Order where Maxwell sought to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken to the media about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict the public identification of victims and witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.
This document is a court docket from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the denial of her bail, and the setting of a trial date for July 2021. The docket also records various motions and orders concerning legal representation, discovery schedules, and rules of conduct for the parties involved.
This document is a court docket sheet from July 2020 chronicling the unsealing of the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, her arrest in New Hampshire, and the assignment of Judge Alison J. Nathan to the case. It details the procedural motions to detain the defendant and the scheduling of her initial arraignment via remote video conference due to COVID-19 protocols at the Metropolitan Detention Center. Correspondence between prosecution attorneys (Rossmiller, Comey, Moe) and defense counsel (Cohen) regarding scheduling is also logged.
This page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell lists legal filings and orders between August 20 and September 8, 2020. Key entries include memoranda and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions regarding victim disclosure and prison conditions, as well as a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell.
This document is a court docket page from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58). It details legal maneuvers regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders between July and August 2020, including a ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a defense request deemed 'unprecedented' and 'too broad' regarding witness privacy. The docket lists filings by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition by Assistant US Attorney Alex Rossmiller.
This document is a court docket page from the Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) criminal proceedings, specifically covering July 27-30, 2020. It details the legal arguments and subsequent court order regarding a 'Protective Order' governing confidential materials. Judge Alison Nathan ruled against Maxwell's request to publicly reference alleged victims who had previously spoken publicly, citing a need to protect witness privacy and the integrity of the criminal investigation.
This document is a docket sheet from July 2020 detailing legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell, including her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty and was denied bail. It records the appearance of her legal team (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the scheduling of her trial for July 2021, and the judge's orders regarding extrajudicial statements and the rejection of letters from non-parties. The document also lists various filings related to protective orders and discovery deadlines.
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-58 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from June 29, 2020, to July 7, 2020. It tracks the unsealing of the indictment, the assignment of the case to Judge Alison J. Nathan, the motion to detain the defendant, and the scheduling of the initial appearance and arraignment amidst COVID-19 restrictions.
This legal document, dated March 24, 2021, is a page from the court record for Case 21-58. It identifies the plaintiff as the USA and lists the five attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who are representing the plaintiff. The document provides contact information, including addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses, for each attorney.
This document is a court docket sheet and memorandum opinion from July 2020 regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the legal dispute over a protective order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly name alleged victims and witnesses. Judge Alison J. Nathan ruled in favor of the Government, adopting their proposed protective order to restrict Maxwell from referencing alleged victims, citing the need to protect their privacy and safety despite previous public statements.
This document is a court docket from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include her arraignment on July 14, where she pleaded not guilty, was denied bail, and remanded into custody. The docket also records subsequent orders and motions concerning discovery deadlines, a defense motion to limit extrajudicial statements (which was denied), and proposed protective orders.
This document is a page from a court docket sheet detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell from late June to early July 2020. It lists events such as the unsealing of the indictment, assignment of the judge, motions to detain, and scheduling orders for arraignment and bail hearings, including specific instructions for remote proceedings due to COVID-19.
This document is a service list page from a court filing dated January 12, 2021, associated with Case 21-58 and referencing criminal case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists four Assistant U.S. Attorneys (Moe, Rossmiller, Comey, and Rohrbach) who received electronic notification of the filing via their Department of Justice email addresses. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019717.
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries between July 27 and July 30, 2020, regarding *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. Key entries include a dispute over the terms of a Protective Order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly reference alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memorandum Opinion & Order siding with the Government to restrict Maxwell from publicly referencing these victims/witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.
This document is a court docket summary from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the denial of her bail, and the setting of a trial date. The document also records various orders and motions filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning discovery deadlines, extrajudicial statements, and a proposed protective order.
This document is a legal filing from Case 21-58, dated January 12, 2021, identifying the USA as the plaintiff. It lists five attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who are representing the government in this case. The document provides the names, roles, and contact information for attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Gainfort Moe, Maurene Ryan Comey, Andrew Rohrbach, and Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz.
This is a letter dated June 16, 2022, from Alan Dershowitz's attorneys to the U.S. prosecutors in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The attorneys inform the prosecution about a recent, confidential deposition of Virginia Giuffre from her civil lawsuit against Dershowitz, arguing it contains information critical to her credibility. They urge the prosecutors to obtain and review this deposition transcript before allowing Giuffre to provide a victim impact statement at Maxwell's upcoming sentencing.
This document is a letter dated June 7, 2022, from legal ethics expert Bruce A. Green to the SDNY prosecutors handling the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Green, retained by Alan Dershowitz, argues that prosecutors may have an ethical obligation to review a sealed deposition given by Virginia Giuffre in a separate civil case before Judge Preska. Dershowitz claims this deposition proves Giuffre lacks credibility regarding the Epstein-Maxwell matter, and Green suggests the prosecutors should verify this before Giuffre provides a victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing.
This legal document summarizes the recollections of an individual identified as "AK" regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. AK recalls the topic resurfacing due to a Miami Herald article, her interactions with the Public Corruption unit around February 2016, and sharing case materials with individuals like Alison Moe. AK asserts she had no role in opening the subsequent SDNY investigation into Epstein and was disturbed by how the case was initially resolved in the SDFL.
The document lists the email address for Alex Rossmiller as Alexander.Rossmiller@usdoj.gov.
The document lists the email address for Alex Rossmiller as Alexander.Rossmiller@usdoj.gov.
Response in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell.
Government response regarding protective order, objecting to defendant's request to publicly name victims.
A letter cited as Doc. #33, in which Alex Rossmiller stated that concerns raised by defense counsel about the future use of discovery materials in civil litigation were not likely to occur.
No preview available
Response to defense motion regarding protective order.
Response to Christian R. Everdell's letter motion regarding Proposed Protective Order.
Response to Christian R. Everdell's motion.
Assurances that the Government rarely provides third parties with materials they did not already possess.
Letter regarding scheduling
Letter regarding scheduling, referenced in Memo Endorsement.
Regarding scheduling.
Request for speedy trial time exclusion, granted by judge.
A letter motion filed by USA regarding the exclusion of time for a speedy trial for Jeffrey Epstein.
Letter Response in Opposition by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein regarding Pretrial Release
A letter response in opposition was filed by Alex Rossmiller on behalf of the USA regarding Reid Weingarten's letter motion for pretrial release.
Response to Motion by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein
A letter response was filed by Alex Rossmiller on behalf of the USA regarding Jeffrey Epstein's motion to seal a document.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity