WAMY
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
BIF
|
Connection |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01-01 | N/A | Fundraising campaign in Saudi Arabia for Al Quds uprising (Intifada) | Saudi Arabia | View |
| 1993-01-01 | N/A | World Trade Center Bombing | New York City | View |
| 1991-01-01 | N/A | Biography of Osama bin Laden jointly published by WAMY and BIF. | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017930.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of civil RICO and ATA complaints against several SAAR Network executives (Al-Awani, Ashrafs, Mirza, Unus) due to lack of specific allegations connecting them to al Qaeda support. However, the court denied the motion to dismiss for Jamal Barzinji regarding material support claims, citing his control over bank accounts and alleged financial transfers to al Qaeda, while dismissing the RICO claim against him. It also briefly mentions a motion for reconsideration by NCB (National Commercial Bank).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017921.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) discussing the court's jurisdiction over Saudi defendants Prince Salman and Prince Naif. It details plaintiffs' arguments that Prince Salman funded terrorist-linked entities (IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and establishes his contacts with the U.S., including stock ownership in Texas and a 1989 meeting with George H.W. Bush. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017916.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion (*In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) status of Saudi defendants. It details the court's denial of a motion to supplement the record against Prince Salman and Prince Naif regarding a 1998 article linking Saudi charities to al Qaida, citing lack of authentication. It also establishes the 'Saudi High Commission' (SHC) as an organ of the Saudi government, noting Prince Salman's role as its President. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017915.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, specifically discussing allegations against Saudi Princes Salman and Naif. It details claims that Prince Salman and Prince Naif used their positions and various charities (such as the SHC, IIRO, and SJRC) to fund and support Islamic militants, including Al Qaeda and Hamas, in regions like Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Palestine. The text cites various complaints alleging the princes knowingly supported terrorist networks and ignored warnings from Western governments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017902.jpg
This document is page 837 of a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The page details the court's rulings on motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi defendants, including the SAAR Network, Adel A.J. Batterjee, the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), and members of the Saudi royal family (Prince Sultan, Prince Turki). While some motions were granted for lack of jurisdiction, others (such as those for SAAR Network and Batterjee) were denied, allowing claims to proceed. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was likely part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017899.jpg
This document is page 834 from a Federal Supplement (349 F. Supp. 2d) concerning 9/11-related litigation (Ashton and Burnett complaints). It details the court's decision to grant Saudi American Bank's motion to dismiss claims that it provided material support to al Qaeda. It also introduces allegations against Arab Bank regarding its financial support for terrorist organizations, including al Qaeda and Hamas, and its alleged role in facilitating the September 11 attacks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017898.jpg
This document is page 833 from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding motions to dismiss by various banking defendants. The text details the court's decision to grant Al Rajhi Bank's motion to dismiss due to a lack of factual allegations connecting the bank to terrorist financing. It also introduces background on the Saudi American Bank, its formation from Citibank branches, and allegations regarding its employees' potential ties to Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017896.jpg
This document is a page from a judicial opinion regarding claims against Al Rajhi Bank related to the September 11 attacks. It details allegations that the bank provided financial services to terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda and Hamas, failed to implement anti-money laundering controls despite warnings, and held accounts for 9/11 hijackers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017889.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court opinion regarding the 'Burnett' litigation, involving claims against Abdel Abdul Jalil Batterjee, the Benevolence International Foundation (BIF), and the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY) for alleged ties to Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. The text details allegations that Batterjee funded BIF, commissioned a biography of Bin Laden, and transferred control of the charity to Enaam Arnaout, who was indicted for roles in the 9/11 attacks. Batterjee disputes these claims, denying financial support to BIF after 1993 and denying knowledge of Bin Laden's activities, while also contesting jurisdiction and service of process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017887.jpg
This document is page 822 from a Federal Supplement court opinion (House Oversight record) regarding 9/11-related lawsuits (Ashton and Burnett complaints). The court dismissed complaints against individuals Tariq, Omar, and Bakr Binladin for lack of jurisdiction but denied the motion to dismiss for the Saudi Binladin Group (SBG), citing the need for discovery regarding SBG's potential ties to al-Qaeda and operations in Maryland. The document also outlines allegations against the 'SAAR Network,' described as a web of charities allegedly established to fund terrorist organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion discussing allegations against Prince Mohamed regarding the financing of terrorism through financial institutions like Al Shamal Islamic Bank and various charities. The text details claims by plaintiffs that Prince Mohamed provided material support to al Qaeda and questions whether the court has personal jurisdiction over him based on his contacts with the United States.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
This document is page 803 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York (2005) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details the Federal Plaintiffs' allegations that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aided terrorists through various charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and the Kingdom's defense based on sovereign immunity and findings from the 9/11 Commission Report stating no evidence was found of Saudi institutional funding. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017865.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court opinion discussing motions to dismiss in a case involving allegations of material support for terrorism. It analyzes legal precedents such as *Halberstam* and *Boim* to determine if Prince Turki and Prince Sultan can be held liable for supporting charities allegedly linked to al Qaeda, noting distinctions regarding when organizations were officially designated as terrorists. The court examines whether plaintiffs have pleaded sufficient facts to show the defendants knew the charities were fronts for illegal activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017849.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) detailing civil litigation related to the 9/11 attacks (specifically the 'Burnett' and 'Ashton' complaints). It outlines allegations against Saudi Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, claiming he funded Islamic charities (IIRO, Al Haramain, MWL, WAMY) that served as fronts for Al Qaeda. The text details a 1990 meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden, and notes $6 million in personal contributions from Sultan to these organizations since 1994.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023393.jpg
This document is page 33 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It details the funding and recruitment mechanisms of al-Qaeda through charities like the IIRO and MWL, citing media reports from the 1990s and relationships involving Osama Bin Laden. The text focuses on the legal standard for inferring a defendant's 'mental state' (knowledge) regarding the funding of terrorism, likely serving as case law precedent in a House Oversight investigation (indicated by the Bates stamp).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023392.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to the 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses the liability of financial institutions, specifically Al Rajhi Bank and Dubai Islamic Bank, for allegedly knowingly providing financial services to Al-Qaeda. The text details how various charities (al Haramain, WAMY, MWL, IIRO, SJRC, BIFs) served as fundraising fronts for Al-Qaeda and links them to specific historical terrorist attacks prior to 9/11. While stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', the document text itself focuses exclusively on terrorist financing and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It details allegations against financial institutions Dallah al Baraka, ABID Corp, and DMI Trust (and individual Kamel) regarding their long-term financial support of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, dating back to the early 1980s. The text describes money laundering, the maintenance of bank accounts for terrorist front organizations, and the facilitation of funds transfers to operatives in Europe and Sudan. The document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023388.jpg
This document is a page from a Westlaw legal printout (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It outlines legal arguments criticizing a district court for ignoring plaintiffs' pleadings against Al Rajhi Bank. The text details allegations that Al Rajhi Bank knowingly provided material support, banking services, and donation management to al-Qaeda and several front charities (IIRO, MWL, WAMY, etc.), as well as providing services to 9/11 hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023383.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal filing titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' obtained from House Oversight records. It details the financial support network of al-Qaeda, specifically focusing on 'The Golden Chain' list of donors, which includes prominent figures such as Khalid bin Mahfouz, Suleiman al Rajhi, and the half-brothers of Osama bin Laden (Bakr, Tariq, Yeslam, and Omar). The text outlines how these individuals allegedly used charities (IIRO, SAAR, Muwafaq) and corporate entities (Saudi Binladin Group) to funnel millions of dollars to al-Qaeda operations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity