| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Jurisdictional coordination conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Jurisdictional coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
1 CLEARLAKE CENTRE LLC
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States attorney
|
Jurisdictional separation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USAO (Federal Prosecutors)
|
Conflict jurisdictional dispute |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
PALM BEACH POLICE
|
Professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Communicated stopped communicating |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Obligated to discuss with |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Inter agency communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Investigated involved in case of |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to actions |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAFLS
|
Professional jurisdictional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of prosecution by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Distrust |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Federal Prosecutor (Sender)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
PBPD
|
Adversarial distrust |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement consultation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
federal prosecutors
|
Professional strained |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Plea agreement for Epstein to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution (Fl. Stat. § 796.07) a... | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Grand Jury proceedings | Florida (Implied) | View |
| N/A | Sentencing recommendation | A binding recommendation for a thirty-month sentence, divided into 18 months in county jail and 1... | 15th Judicial Circuit in an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Joint recommendation by Epstein and the State Attorney's Office for Epstein to serve at least two... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Original criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein in Florida, which resulted in a non-prosecution ag... | South Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | State indictment of Epstein for solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The State Attorney's office offered Jeffrey Epstein a plea deal for five years of probation with ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 15-month investigation into Jeffrey Epstein was conducted by the Palm Beach State Attorney's Of... | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plea Agreement Terms | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta's decision to defer victim notification to state authorities concerning Epstein's state pl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Consultation with the State Attorney's Office regarding Epstein's case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 15-month investigation by the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office, resulting in Epstein's indict... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Plea agreement | Epstein agrees to plead guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution and one count of soli... | 15th Judicial Circuit in an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to a plea deal where he pleaded guilty to felony solicitation and procuring a pers... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for Epstein to resolve state and federal criminal liability and undertake certain actions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Plea agreement | Epstein agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of minors to enga... | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | The State Attorney's office offered Mr. Epstein a plea deal for five years probation with no crim... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Prosecution | The state's prosecution of Epstein, which Acosta decided not to supersede with a federal prosecut... | state | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for Epstein to plead guilty to specific Florida statutes in exchange for deferred feder... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Plea agreement | Epstein agrees to plead guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution (Case No. 2006-cf-009... | 15th Judicial Circuit in an... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing recommendation | A binding recommendation for a thirty (30) month sentence, consisting of consecutive terms of twe... | 15th Judicial Circuit | View |
| N/A | Plea agreement | Epstein agrees to plead guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution and an Information re... | 15th Judicial Circuit in an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
This document details events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing from June 2008 to June 2009, including communications between various officials regarding the handling of his case and concerns about the terms of his plea agreement. It highlights discrepancies and objections raised by Villafaña regarding Epstein's proposed custody arrangements, suggesting a potential violation of the agreement's spirit.
This document details a March 12, 2008 meeting involving Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Starr, Lefkowitz, Weinberg) and Department of Justice representatives (Oosterbaan, Mandelker, CEOS Deputy Chief) concerning the Epstein case. It outlines concerns raised by the defense regarding USAO actions, including communication issues with state authorities and a purported relationship between USAO official Sloman and a law firm representing victims. The document also mentions Sloman's prior work in private practice specializing in sexual abuse claims.
This document details the efforts of Jeffrey Epstein's defense team in December 2007 to challenge the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the federal investigation. It describes how defense counsel Starr and Lefkowitz sent letters and 'ethics opinions' to Acosta, criticizing the investigation and accusing an individual named Villafaña of improper conduct and federal overreaching, while Epstein reaffirmed his acceptance of the NPA.
This document details negotiations and communications surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) addendum in late 2007. It highlights disagreements and strategies among prosecutors (Acosta, Sloman, Villafaña, Lourie) and defense counsel (Lefkowitz), including the postponement of Epstein's plea and concerns about Epstein's alleged attempts to discredit victims and influence the legal process. The text also includes Acosta's perspective on not dictating to the state attorney's office.
This document details aspects of an agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein, including his guilty plea timeline, immunity for co-conspirators, and conditions for federal investigation suspension. It also mentions a concern expressed via email by Lefkowitz to Lourie about media leaks prejudicing Epstein and a New York Post report on Epstein's plea deal from October 2007.
This document details the finalization and signing of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) on September 24, 2007. It highlights the edits made by Acosta, including changes to Epstein's plea and sentencing requirements, and communications between various parties like Villafaña, Lourie, and Lefkowitz regarding the agreement's language and confidentiality. The document also notes the USAO's duty to redact protected information before disclosure.
This document details inconsistencies and omissions in Police Reports and probable cause affidavits related to meetings between defense counsel and the State Attorney's Office concerning Epstein, and the discovery of surveillance equipment and other items at Epstein's residence. It highlights instances where information was allegedly misrepresented or omitted, such as the PBPD's failure to attend a meeting where Epstein's psycho-sexual evaluation was presented, and the characterization of items found in Epstein's home.
This document outlines an agreement to defer federal prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on his compliance with specific conditions and actions with the State Attorney's Office. The agreement, authorized by R. Alexander Acosta, states that federal prosecution will be deferred in favor of state prosecution, and if Epstein fulfills all terms, federal charges will be dismissed; however, if he violates the agreement, federal prosecution may be initiated.
This document is an excerpt from a legal agreement or plea agreement involving Epstein. It details conditions of his plea, including waiving rights to challenge information and appeal, and not contesting the jurisdiction or victim status of minors. The agreement outlines the United States' obligations to provide a victim list and seek a guardian ad litem, and sets dates for Epstein's sentencing (September 28, 2007) and commencement of sentence (October 15, 2007).
This document details the Office of Professional Responsibility's (OPR) findings and criticisms regarding Acosta's handling of victim notification in the Epstein case. It focuses on Acosta's personal involvement in the notification process, his decision to defer responsibility to the State Attorney, and his failure to ensure victims were properly informed of Epstein's state court pleas, despite his staff's efforts. The document highlights the inadequate communication and coordination between the USAO, Acosta, and the State Attorney's Office concerning victim notification.
This document, an excerpt from a legal report, discusses the handling of victim notification in the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically focusing on the roles of Sloman, Villafaña, and PBPD Chief Reiter, and the subsequent review of prosecutor Acosta's actions by OPR. It analyzes whether federal victim notification laws (CVRA/VRRA) applied to state court proceedings and concludes that Acosta's deferral of victim notification to the State Attorney's Office did not constitute professional misconduct. Legal citations and quotes from individuals involved are provided to support the analysis.
This document details events surrounding Epstein's state plea, focusing on victim notification failures and the actions of various legal and investigative parties. It highlights Villafaña's efforts to identify victims and contact their attorneys, and statements from victims (Wild, Jane Doe #2) expressing their lack of awareness regarding the plea's implications for their cases. The document also notes discrepancies in the State Attorney's Office's communication about the case closure and Epstein's sentence.
This document excerpt details discussions and concerns surrounding victim notification and the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case. Key figures like Sloman, Villafaña, and Acosta provided accounts to OPR regarding the federal plea process, communication between federal and state authorities, and the challenges of victim identification and notification, including a potential $150,000 payment for victims. The text also highlights discrepancies in victim counts and the impact of Epstein's defense team on inter-agency communications.
This document details events from December 2007 concerning victim notification letters related to Jeffrey Epstein's case. Villafaña prepared letters for victims but was instructed by Sloman to hold them after the USAO, via Sanchez, requested a delay due to Epstein's upcoming plea hearing and concerns about potential impeachment of victims for monetary compensation. The document also highlights an FBI agent's concern about unnotified victims and the defense's involvement in drafting letters, as well as Villafaña's later contact with an attorney representing a victim known as Jane Doe #2.
This document details communications and disagreements among legal parties regarding victim notification practices and the timing of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing in late 2007. Key figures like Sloman, Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, Starr, and Fisher are involved in discussions concerning the Justice for All Act, the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the proper procedure for informing victims of the case's developments, including objections from defense counsel and directives from prosecutors.
This document details how case agents and an individual named Villafaña solicited victims' opinions on resolving the federal investigation into Epstein. It highlights that victims had varied desires, including some wanting a plea deal, some opposing prosecution, and others wanting jail time, while many expressed concerns about privacy, safety, and the impact of public disclosure on their relationships. The document also notes that Villafaña's records and memory of these interactions were sometimes insufficient for OPR to fully assess the discussions.
This document excerpt details the victim notification processes during the Epstein investigation, specifically focusing on the actions of an individual named Villafaña and the FBI. It highlights discrepancies and lack of uniformity in victim notification, with Villafaña preparing her own introductory letters to victims while the FBI also sent letters, often without Villafaña's direct knowledge or review, prior to Epstein's guilty plea in 2008.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The witness details his extensive law enforcement career spanning from 1966 to 2003, including time as a CSI lieutenant, training at the FBI Academy, and his transition to the Town of Palm Beach Police Department as a crime scene manager in 2003.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where an attorney argues against an allegation that Mr. Epstein authorized an investigator to drive someone off the road. The speaker contends there is no proof of this authorization and that other attorneys involved, Mr. Goldberger and Roy Black, were never questioned about the incident and do not know the investigator. The argument is made to a judge ("Your Honor") and references a prior investigation in Florida.
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining sentencing timelines, gain time restrictions, and confidentiality clauses for Epstein. It explicitly states that in exchange for his guilty plea, the United States will not prosecute named potential co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova) and will suspend the federal Grand Jury investigation.
This page contains sections 7 through 11 of a legal agreement (likely the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement) between the United States and Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the protocol for identifying victims, appointing a representative for them (paid by Epstein), and handling civil liability claims under 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Crucially, the text states that Epstein's agreement to pay damages or waive liability contests in specific federal contexts does not constitute a general admission of civil or criminal liability.
This document is a page from a legal plea agreement detailing the terms under which Jeffrey Epstein will plead guilty to state charges in Palm Beach County, Florida. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution and a second count of solicitation of a minor, which requires him to register as a sex offender. In exchange, a binding recommendation will be made for a 30-month sentence, divided into 18 months in county jail and 12 months of community control, with the entire agreement being contingent on a judge's approval.
This document is a page from a legal agreement detailing a deferred prosecution deal for Epstein. Under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida for sex trafficking offenses will be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida. The agreement stipulates that if Epstein violates its terms, federal prosecution can be initiated, but if he complies, all charges related to the joint FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office investigation will be dismissed.
This document is a scanned image of an envelope sent by the law firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. to Lanna Leigh Belohlavek, Esq. at the State Attorney's Office in West Palm Beach, Florida. The postage meter indicates the item was mailed on March 31, 2008, with a cost of $0.41. The document includes footer information indicating it is part of a 2017 Public Records Request (No. 17-295) and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00030394.
This document is a Certificate of Service dated March 31, 2008. It certifies that legal documents were served via facsimile and U.S. mail to attorneys Jack A. Goldberger and Lanna Leigh Belohlavek (of the State Attorney's Office) in West Palm Beach, Florida. The document is page 40 of a larger release (114 pages) related to Public Records Request No. 17-295.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity