Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OFF
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's attorneys
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] AUSA
|
Employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Efrain Reyes
|
Defendant prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Oath Keepers
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Investigation subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein Investigation (2018R01618)
|
Investigating authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell by the Southern District of New York | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers were in touch with the Southern District of New York. | Southern District of New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-10 | N/A | UMB received a request/subpoena regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. | UMB (Kansas City, MO) | View |
| 2019-07-17 | N/A | Filing of detention submission document for JE (Jeffrey Epstein). | New York, NY | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Miami Herald filed federal court motion seeking access to sealed documents. | Southern District of New York | View |
EFTA00023817.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 28 to August 3, 2020, between SDNY prosecutors (including an AUSA and Alison) and UK defense attorneys from Blackfords LLP (Gary Bloxsome, Jennifer Richardson). The correspondence negotiates the terms of a voluntary interview for a Blackfords client (unnamed in text, but contextually relevant to Prince Andrew) in connection with 'US v Maxwell'. Key topics include protections against evidence use outside the Maxwell case, immunity comparable to MLAT proceedings, elements of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (False Statements), and the extension of a 'Negotiation Period' to August 10, 2020.
EFTA00023804.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome, the lawyer representing Prince Andrew, spanning January to February 2020. The DOJ explicitly requests a voluntary interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. While Bloxsome claims the Prince desires to cooperate, tensions escalate when U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman publicly states that Prince Andrew has provided 'zero cooperation,' leading Bloxsome to accuse the DOJ of breaching confidentiality agreements.
EFTA00023791.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (representing Prince Andrew, the Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in July 2020. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding a request for Prince Andrew to sit for a voluntary interview concerning the Epstein investigation. Key points of contention include the confidentiality of the proceedings, allegations of media leaks by US officials (specifically Geoffrey Berman and Audrey Strauss), and the legal mechanisms of the interview (voluntary vs. compelled via MLAT). The SDNY proposes a two-week confidential negotiation period to resolve the impasse.
EFTA00023783.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (counsel for Prince Andrew/Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York in July 2020. The correspondence concerns negotiations for Prince Andrew to provide a voluntary interview to US authorities regarding the Epstein investigation. The US side threatens a compelled interview via MLAT if no voluntary date is set, while the UK side complains about leaks, 'media circus', and seeks strict confidentiality assurances before agreeing to an interview.
EFTA00023782.pdf
Email from an SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney to Gary Bloxsome (lawyer, likely for Prince Andrew based on context of 2020 Epstein/Maxwell investigation and MLAT/London references) regarding 'Sensitive Correspondence.' The email provides a blank proffer agreement, outlines the legal elements of making false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and discusses protections under the MLAT process for a potential voluntary interview. It also confirms a negotiation period extension until August 10, 2020.
EFTA00023778.pdf
An email from an Associate U.S. Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated March 10, 2020. The sender requests a colleague to compile Epstein-related press releases, charges, and other public documents, referencing a meeting held a couple of weeks prior. The subject line references 'Epstein FOIAs'.
EFTA00023774.pdf
This document contains an email chain from February and March 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and likely FBI technicians regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The correspondence discusses the logistical challenges of organizing massive amounts of data (over 1 million documents), including 9 hard drives from a 2007 search, 40 devices and 60+ CDs from the New York mansion, and 25+ devices (including server racks) from the Virgin Islands. Key details include a mention of an FBI screen for Child Pornography (CP) which reportedly came back negative for the specific batch discussed, and technical issues involving a network replacement that required the deletion of 400 TB of old data.
EFTA00023749.pdf
This document is an internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York, dated September 16, 2020. The email asks a colleague to review a final draft of an attached document titled '2020-09-16_GM_ex-parte_discovery_letter.v4.docx', which likely pertains to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell (GM).
EFTA00023747.pdf
An email chain from September 14, 2020, involving an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence acknowledges receipt of a document related to case number 2020PR000426AMB concerning Jeffrey E. Epstein.
EFTA00023699.pdf
This document is an email chain from September and October 2020 between Marc A. Weinstein (Hughes Hubbard & Reed) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The SDNY requested a specific deposition transcript from a 2009 lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein involving a plaintiff represented by Jack Scarola. Weinstein coordinated with Scarola to ensure there were no protective orders preventing disclosure before providing the transcript to the SDNY on behalf of the Epstein Estate.
EFTA00023503.pdf
This document contains an email chain from September 14-17, 2020, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The correspondence is between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan. The emails discuss the submission and filing of letters and memo endorsements 'ex parte and under seal' pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(1).
EFTA00023500.pdf
An email chain from February 2021 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and another office (likely Southern District of Florida). SDNY requests a specific document ('Box #1 P-003679 Thru P-003680') from the 'SDFL Epstein file' referenced in a privilege log connected to the CVRA lawsuit. The responding office cites technical issues with vendor scans and a reduced 25% in-office work schedule, necessitating a staff member to drive in specifically to locate the physical document.
EFTA00023467.pdf
This document is an internal email from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) dated September 28, 2021, discussing potential trial exhibits (ESI). The email reveals that evidence was recovered from a computer registered to 'gmax' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), which was a clone of a computer from Epstein's Palm Beach house created by his private investigators in 2005. The FBI recovered these cloned drives from Epstein's NYC townhouse in 2019.
EFTA00023466.pdf
An email dated September 30, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell case.' The email discusses a draft 'RTC' (likely Requests to Charge/Jury Instructions) attached as 'Maxwell_RTC_v11.docx' and notes a filing deadline of October 27 for a joint proposal.
EFTA00023415.pdf
An email dated November 15, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to supervisors ('Chiefs'). The email submits a 'Second Daubert Motion' (specifically 'Motion_to_preclude_Hall_et_al_v3.docx') for review ahead of a filing deadline the next day. The sender's identity and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00023414.pdf
An email chain from November 2021 involving Assistant United States Attorneys from the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns the filing of a 'Second Daubert Motion' intended to preclude the testimony of a 'Dr. Hall' (likely an expert witness). The emails discuss the drafting of the motion and a deadline for the following day.
EFTA00023413.pdf
An email dated November 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to a colleague regarding a draft Q&A for Paul Kane (likely a witness, such as an FBI agent). The email discusses legal strategy for admitting records not created by 'PCS' but maintained by them as business records, citing the case United States v. Kuthuru. This correspondence appears to be part of the preparation for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00023411.pdf
This document is an email dated November 13, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email submits a letter and exhibit 'GX-52' (referenced in attachments) and requests that the exhibit be filed under seal. Defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00023387.pdf
This document is an email dated June 25, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York to colleagues at USANYS. The subject concerns a letter to 'AJN' (Judge Alison J. Nathan) regarding the prosecution team. Attached is a PDF document dated October 7, 2020, related to 'GM' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) regarding discovery from other agencies.
EFTA00023365.pdf
An email from the Southern District of New York (Government) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email submits proposed redactions related to 'Witness-3' (also referred to as Accuser-3 in attachments) pursuant to previous court orders and motions.
EFTA00023362.pdf
This document is an email dated November 21, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca. The email transmits attachments containing proposed redactions regarding 'Witness-3' (also referred to as Accuser-3 and MV-3 in filenames) related to case filings (Case 20cr330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
EFTA00023355.pdf
An internal email from November 13, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The sender asks colleagues to review a 'final version' of a document titled '2021-11-12_GM_letter_re_CC_statements_v3.docx' before it is filed. The document likely pertains to the Ghislaine Maxwell case ('GM') and statements regarding a 'CC' (possibly Co-Conspirator).
EFTA00023353.pdf
An email exchange dated November 12, 2021, between officials at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). A Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit requests a copy of 'GX-52G', and a colleague replies attaching that file along with defense motions related to Ghislaine Maxwell and FBI 302 reports from a 2009 obstruction case.
EFTA00023341.pdf
An email thread from March 2020 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The participants discuss a Detroit News article reporting that the University of Michigan switched law firms (dropping Steptoe) because the firm represented Jeffrey Epstein, Roman Polanski, and Robert Anderson. The prosecutors express a lack of sympathy for the law firm, with comments like 'oops', 'Can't say I feel bad for Steptoe about this', and 'Indeed'.
EFTA00023252.pdf
An email dated October 16, 2020, from a Criminal Clerk at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Vyskocil. The email requests a signature on an attached 'Unsealing Order' related to an Epstein application (as indicated by the attachment filename) and notes that the document is destined for a 'red sealing envelope'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity